Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Sept 2018
- Postcode verified
SL1 2BE
- Name on report verified
NSL Limited
- URN verified
1278596
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 12
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 6 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Name of lead inspector: Steve Lambert HMI
p.1
Inspection date(s): 12–13 September 2018
p.1
Address:
The Urban Building 4th Floor 3–9 Albert Street Slough Berkshire SL1 2BE Monitoring visit: NSL Limited, 12–13 September 2018
p.1
Context and focus of visit
This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of a series of monitoring visits to a sample of new apprenticeship training providers that are funded through the apprenticeship levy. Ofsted’s intention to carry out monitoring visits to these new providers was first announced by Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector in November 2017. The focus of these visits is on the three themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Established in 2009, NSL Limited provides a range of civil enforcement, highways planning and traffic-management services to local authorities and airports across the country. Since May 2017, the company has been delivering levy-funded apprenticeships through its newly created NSL academy. One-hundred and twenty- four apprentices are on either a level 3 or level 5 business standard.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not have sufficient oversight of the progress that apprentices make towards achieving their apprenticeship. They have not implemented a robust enough approach to tracking and monitoring apprentices’ progress, in particular to ensure that they complete their programme in the planned time. Too much of the information about apprentices’ learning and progress is held by assessors, and not reported on to managers. As a result, leaders and managers are unable to hold staff to account for the progress that apprentices make.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not have a formal process for monitoring the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. They provide informal feedback to tutors following observations of learning sessions, but do not record this in a systematic way to help tutors to develop their practice. Leaders and managers do not have a clear overview of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. They consequently do not support teachers to make improvements where necessary, for example in the quality of their feedback to apprentices on their assignments, which too often is poor.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers, in establishing the apprenticeship training, gave insufficient attention to the teaching of English and mathematics. They have recently appointed a Skills for Life manager to support apprentices to develop their knowledge and skills in these subjects, and this is starting to have a positive impact in helping apprentices develop their mathematics skills, although it is less effective for English. The Monitoring visit: NSL Limited, 12–13 September 2018 proportion of apprentices who pass their functional skills English and mathematics examinations is low.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers share a vision and ambition to provide high-quality apprenticeship training. They have implemented an apprenticeship programme that supports individuals to gain the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need to work more effectively on local authority contracts. Leaders’ and managers’ recruitment process is thorough, and apprentices are carefully selected to ensure that the programme is suitable for them. Consequently, very few apprentices leave the programme. Apprentices have a good understanding of the career benefits that the apprenticeship programme provides. The large majority of apprentices on the level 5 programme have gained additional responsibilities or promotion while on their apprenticeship.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have a secure understanding of the requirements of the apprenticeship programme. They relate the apprenticeship standards successfully to their own business requirements, for example, providing effective customer services on behalf of local councils. Leaders and managers monitor apprentices’ entitlement to off-the-job training effectively. They ensure that apprentices’ attendance at training days is recorded and that apprentices accurately note the time spent undertaking their off-the-job learning. Leaders and managers have recruited trainers with considerable business experience which benefits apprentices.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Apprentices’ line managers receive comprehensive information about their responsibilities before apprentices begin their training. Academy leaders and managers work closely with line managers to ensure that the requirements of the business can be covered while apprentices are training off the job. In addition, apprentices, trainers and apprentices’ line managers meet frequently to ensure that apprentices are being allowed time away from their normal job roles to complete the necessary work needed for the apprenticeship.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Too many apprentices make slow progress in completing units on their qualifications. A high proportion of apprentices on level 3 and level 5 programmes have either failed to meet the submission deadline for a substantial proportion of their assignments, or have not resubmitted work when their original assignments did not meet the criteria for a pass. Leaders and managers do not have a good enough overview of the progress that apprentices make and have not ensured that trainers support apprentices to catch up.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Trainers, in their feedback on apprentices’ assignment work at level 3, do not identify in enough detail how apprentices can improve their work to ensure that they achieve Monitoring visit: NSL Limited, 12–13 September 2018 a pass. For those apprentices who pass assignments, trainers do not provide any information on what they can do to gain a higher grade. As a result, level 3 apprentices do not understand the progress that they are making and what they need to do to improve. Trainers’ feedback to the small number of apprentices on the level 5 programme is of a very high standard; trainers give constructive guidance on how apprentices can improve their work.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Apprentices are not clear about the requirements of their end-point assessment and what they need to do to achieve a merit or distinction grade. Trainers have not set apprentices target grades and, as a result, apprentices have no indication of the grades they should aim to achieve.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers assess apprentices carefully when they begin their apprenticeship. In conjunction with the apprentices’ line managers and trainers they review the apprentices’ existing knowledge, skills and experience to determine their training needs at the start of the apprenticeship. Trainers carefully record and regularly review apprentices’ short- and long-term career aspirations. However, when planning learning, trainers do not take sufficient account of what they know about apprentices’ starting points. They pay insufficient attention to what individual apprentices will learn. For example, trainers do not specify clearly in training sessions what apprentices will know or be able to do and how this learning will be achieved.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Trainers do not plan sufficiently for the development of apprentices’ skills in English or mathematics. For example, on level 3 apprenticeships these topics are taught separately from, and without sufficient reference to, the apprentices’ learning on other components of their programmes. Apprentices make slow progress in achieving their functional skills qualifications in English and mathematics and in using their skills in relation to their work setting. For example, a minority of apprentices make grammatical errors in their written work.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Most apprentices are highly motivated, as they value the opportunity to develop new knowledge, skills and behaviours that are relevant to their job roles. Apprentices develop their knowledge of various management theories which they apply effectively in different work-related situations. For example, apprentices spoke positively about the skills they had gained in project management, improved communication with their teams, and line managing staff.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers ensure that safeguarding arrangements are effective, they have suitable policies in place which are reviewed regularly.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices receive appropriate safeguarding training at induction. This includes information on how to keep themselves safe when dealing with the public and how Monitoring visit: NSL Limited, 12–13 September 2018 to manage conflict which they may face as part of their job. Apprentices feel confident about reporting issues to their manager or to an externally provided helpline and know that these will be dealt with effectively.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices receive effective support to keep them safe. They receive guidance at the start of their programme on how they can access support on a range of mental- health and wellbeing needs. Apprentices receive ongoing advice on the safe use of computers. They have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe online.
p.5
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have established effective links with local authority safeguarding groups in the geographical areas in which they operate. Leaders and managers know what to do should there be a safeguarding incident with one of the apprentices.
p.5
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers ensure that appropriate pre-employment checks are carried out prior to an individual joining the academy. A newly appointed designated safeguarding lead has yet to receive appropriate training, although this is planned. Leaders and managers do not record all incidents on a central register. As a result, leaders and managers are not able to identify trends and provide access to support before issues arise. All staff and apprentices have attended ‘Prevent’ duty training. As a result, they have a good understanding of their responsibilities to report any concerns.
p.5
Reasonable progress
Trainers do not integrate safeguarding and information on the dangers associated with radicalisation and extremism sufficiently into their training and their discussions with apprentices at progress reviews. As a result, apprentices have a limited understanding of how these topics apply to them in their workplace and in their lives. Monitoring visit: NSL Limited, 12–13 September 2018 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to
p.6
Reasonable progress
the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion