Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Heathfield Junior School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Sept 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Karen Matthews
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
TW2 6EN
- Name on report verified
Heathfield Junior School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies5
“Record-keeping is methodical and rigorous.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,147
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Paul Clayton Executive Headteacher Heathfield Junior School Cobbett Road Twickenham TW2 6EN
p.1
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
Following my visit to the school on 19 September 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the previous inspection. You set clear expectations for staff and pupils, underpinned by the school’s values. This clarity is obvious in all of your systems and procedures.
p.1
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
You have created a caring and inclusive school. This is recognised by staff, pupils, and parents and carers. This is captured by one parent reported that, ‘staff go above and beyond to bring out the best in the pupils’. Pupils are also proud of their school. They work hard, are keen to talk about their achievements and they play an active part in the life of the school. They enjoy helping the younger children in the infant school. They can see how these relationships are vital in supporting transitions from Year 2 to Year 3 and beyond.
p.1
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
You have a good understanding of what action needs to be taken to address any current areas of underperformance. Since the previous inspection, leaders have strengthened teaching across the school. However, you are aware that you still need to build on these improvements and ensure that outcomes for disadvantaged pupils by the end of Year 6 are as closer to those of their peers.
p.1
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
Governors know the school well and demonstrate a clear understanding of their strategic role in both supporting and challenging you and your leaders on key aspects of the school’s work. This includes asking relevant and probing questions relating to pupils’ outcomes. Safeguarding is effective.
p.1
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that the school meets statutory requirements. The designated safeguarding lead is knowledgeable and clear in their role. They are well known and well regarded by pupils, who speak confidently about complex safeguarding issues they have considered as a result of the curriculum input that they receive. The safeguarding policy is comprehensive and clear. Leaders ensure that staff are regularly and thoroughly trained in the school’s safeguarding and child protection procedures. Leaders understand the local and national safeguarding challenges that pupils face. They ensure that staff receive regular updates on these and that information is shared in a timely way. Record-keeping is methodical and rigorous. Checks on visitors to the school are carried out with the utmost care. The school carries out pre-employment checks rigorously, and the single central record is well
p.2
Short inspection of Heathfield Junior School
maintained. This is to ensure that all staff are suitable to work with children.
p.2
Inspection findings
My first line of enquiry focused on how leaders have managed the changes that have been brought by federation with Heathfield Infant School since the last inspection. This is because the school now shares resources and senior staff with them.
p.2
Inspection findings
School leaders have used the federation as an opportunity to retain and develop key staff for the benefit of all pupils. They have used these key people to improve teachers’ subject knowledge and understanding of learning. Evidence from classroom visits shows that this work has improved teaching and learning across the school.
p.2
Inspection findings
A new assessment system came out of the initial work done by staff in both schools after federation. This has ensured that there is now an accurate view of pupils’ progress and attainment throughout. As a result of this, targets set are sharp, focused and aspirational for all. Pupils and staff speak of the benefits that this individualised approach has had on outcomes and there is evidence in the books that assessment is used regularly and well.
p.2
Inspection findings
Leaders have used the federation to support vulnerable families and share their expertise across both schools. Attendance has improved as a result and relationships are stronger than ever.
p.2
Inspection findings
Families report that they see the schools as one school now and pupils say that they feel the learning has improved since federation, with tasks being more challenging. They talk about it being matched to their ‘level of difficulty’ and attribute this to teachers knowing them all the way through the school.
p.2
Inspection findings
My second line of enquiry focused on the teaching and learning of writing. This was because leaders have been working to increase attainment by the end of Year 6 to ensure that greater proportions of children reach the expected or higher standard.
p.2
Inspection findings
Leaders have taken a systematic approach to raising standards in writing that supports teaching and learning in the classroom. We saw examples of strong practice in all classes visited. Pupils display high levels of engagement and resilience in writing tasks. The texts chosen to support the writing process are challenging and the vocabulary is stretching. There is evidence in books sampled of pupils demonstrating that they have used all of these strategies to produce high-quality outcomes.
p.3
Inspection findings
The clear assessment systems in place support pupils in understanding what they need to do to improve further. There is also evidence of well-placed feedback and opportunities for discussion that promote a culture of high expectations. The pupils report that they value these ‘conferences’ as they give them a chance to talk about their learning and the way in which they write.
p.3
Inspection findings
My final line of enquiry focused on provision for the most disadvantaged pupils. This is because the school have identified that the gap between these pupils and their peers has not significantly closed within the last two years and the school is working to address this.
p.3
Inspection findings
Your school development plan identified the need for training for staff in supporting those children in receipt of the pupil premium grant. There have already been a number of sessions this academic year for both teachers and support staff on strategies to raise attainment for this group. Evidence seen in classrooms and books shows that these strategies are being used on a regular basis to ensure equality of opportunity for all.
p.3
Inspection findings
Leaders have identified current interventions that have had significant impact for older pupils in closing the gap between them and their peers. They now plan to roll these out to younger pupils.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
The percentage of pupils entitled to the pupil premium grant working at age-related expectations increases in reading, writing and mathematics to be in line with their peers by:
p.3
Next steps for the school
continuing to check that all interventions are matched closely to specific need, thus ensuring the maximum impact on standards.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Richmond upon Thames. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection the following activities were carried out:
p.4
Information about the inspection
I met with you, other senior leaders and members of staff, two governors, including the chair and vice-chair, and the local authority school improvement partner. I met with pupils from across key stage 2. I visited classrooms with senior leaders across the school to gather evidence about our key areas of enquiry and look at pupils’ work. I looked at key documents, including the school’s self-evaluation of its own performance and the school development plan; information about pupil premium expenditure; information on the progress made by pupils and documents relating to safeguarding. I also looked at information on the school’s website. I analysed the confidential online questionnaires of 29 members of staff and the views of 74 parents who responded on Parent View, including 67 free-text responses.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion