Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder EY464874

Inspected 2 Oct 2018 · URN EY464874

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Beverley Devlin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Oct 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Beverley Devlin

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY464874

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−32Criticalmore positive than 64% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelysecure knowledgefeel safesecureenjoywarmhappy
Criticismfailsweaknessesinadequatenot effectivebreachesat riskcompromisedconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings464w−19
  • Leadership150w−69
  • What needs to improve224w−3

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
827
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 7
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection date 2 October 2018 Previous inspection date 14 January 2014

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4

p.1

The provision is inadequate

n The childminder fails to ensure that risk assessments are effective to minimise any possible risks to children. n The childminder does not provide the appropriate support for her assistant. She does not evaluate his practice to focus on ways to improve practice and outcomes for children. n The childminder does not record accurate registers for all children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance. n The childminder fails to assess children's progress effectively or provide activities that meet children's individual learning needs. Children do not make adequate progress from their starting points.

p.1

It has the following strengths

n Daily conversations with parents help to provide continuity of care for children. n Parents are complimentary about the childminder and the service that she provides. n Effective settling-in arrangements help prepare children emotionally for their move into the childminder's care. Children show lovely attachments to the childminder. They affectionately snuggle into her arms, demonstrating they feel safe and secure.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action: We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date ensure that effective risk assessments are undertaken to identify, check and remove or minimise any hazards to children's safety, particularly in relation to when children are playing outdoors 15/10/2018

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

provide effective supervision and coaching to support the assistant in his ongoing professional development, to safeguard children and meet their learning and development needs well 15/10/2018

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

ensure that a daily record of the names of all children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance is kept and available for inspection at all times 15/10/2018

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

take action to develop a secure knowledge of all aspects of the learning and development requirements, to improve outcomes for children. 15/10/2018

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

Inspection activities n The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact this has on the children's learning. n The inspector spoke with the childminder and interacted with the children at appropriate times through the inspection. n The inspector looked at the assessments of the children's progress and the planning documentation. n The inspector checked the suitability of the childminder and other household members. She looked at a sample of the childminder's policies and procedures.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder does not have a secure knowledge of the requirements of the early years foundation stage. She has not thought carefully about her own practice, or that of her assistant, and where she might need to make improvements. The childminder has not assessed the risks or hazards to the children when outdoors. As a result, there are breaches of legal requirements. However, the childminder does have a secure understanding of her responsibilities regarding child protection. She knows the procedures to follow if she has a concern about a child's welfare or if an allegation is made against her or her assistant. The childminder has a secure knowledge of the indicators that may suggest children are at risk of being exposed to extreme ideas about right and wrong. The childminder works closely with the local authority early years adviser and shares good practice with local childminders.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

Weaknesses in teaching and assessment have a significant impact on children's learning and development. The childminder does not fully understand how to assess children's progress to identify precisely their stage of development or gaps in their learning. Although she carries out some observations of children as they play, she is not sufficiently aware of the expected levels of development for their ages. Consideration is not given to what each child needs to achieve and planned activities do not meet children's learning needs. However, toddlers hum nursery rhymes as they sit on the childminder's knee and enjoy turning the pages of the book. They easily operate age- related electronic toys and anticipate the sound the buttons make as they press them.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's safety and well-being are compromised. That said, the childminder provides a warm and homely environment in which children actively move around and develop their independence. The childminder effectively helps very young children to gain good personal and social skills. For example, they happily pass and share their toys with the childminder and cooperate with self-care routines, such as eating and nappy changes. Children are generally happy and form appropriate attachments with the childminder and her assistant. The childminder has flexible settling-in procedures, which she agrees with parents. This appropriately supports children's transition from home to her care.

p.3

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children do not make the progress they are capable of because teaching does not focus on their individual needs and next steps for learning. Children show some curiosity and eagerness to explore their environment. They develop their physical skills, for example, as they use small tools, and learn to feed themselves at mealtimes. Children do not gain the skills they need to prepare them well for school and for their future learning.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY464874 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 10080475

p.4

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register

p.4

Day care type

Age range of children 0 - 7 Total number of places 5 Number of children on roll 10 Date of previous inspection 14 January 2014

p.4

Day care type

The childminder registered in 2013 and lives in Perton, Staffordshire. She operates all year round, from 7am to 6pm on Monday to Friday, with the exception of family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate childcare qualification at level 3. She works with an assistant.

p.4

Day care type

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Day care type

procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Day care type

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Day care type

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.5

Day care type

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .

p.5

Day care type

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion