Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Channels and Choices Limited in Kent
Summary
Sarah Olliver (lead), Tracey Scott
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Channels and Choices Limited
- Inspection date verified
8 Aug 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Sarah Olliver, Tracey Scott
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement to be good
- Overall effectiveness reviewed
Good
- Name on report verified
SC408584
- URN verified
SC408584
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementRI to be good
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For some, risk-taking behaviour reached unsafe levels that resulted in a child moving on. p.4
- Leaders and managers have failed to analyse records of missing incidents to identify patterns and trends. p.4
- Records of meetings fail to evidence attendees or actions agreed. p.4
- However, managers fail to demonstrate lessons learned. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 939
- shorter than usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 1 SC408584 Registered provider: Channels and Choices Limited
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home is owned by a private organisation. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for three children who have emotional and behavioural needs.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The manager was registered with Ofsted on 23 November 2015.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good
p.1
good
The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 2
p.1
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
03/10/2017 Full Good 10/08/2016 Full Outstanding 22/02/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 02/11/2015 Full Good Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 3
p.2
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.3
Requirement Due date
12. (1) The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.3
Requirement Due date
(2) In particular, the standard requires the registered person to ensure—
p.3
Requirement Due date
(i) assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. (Regulation 12(2)(a)(i))
p.3
Requirement Due date
Specifically, risk assessments for children must be individualised. 14/09/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The leadership and management standard is that the registered person use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13(2)(h)) 14/09/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The children’s case records standard is that the registered person must ensure the children’s records are kept up to date, signed, and dated by the author of each entry. (Regulation 36(1)(b)(c))
p.3
Requirement Due date
Specifically, ensure that records are factual, meeting minutes include attendees, actions and who is responsible, and files are well ordered containing information about only the individual child. 14/09/2018
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 4 Children’s experiences at this home are predominantly good. For some, risk-taking behaviour reached unsafe levels that resulted in a child moving on. Other children, who have close relationships with staff, have developed resilience and made progress.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff encourage the children to learn new skills. Children participate in budgeting, shopping, preparing meals and helping around the home. Education is positively promoted, and there is effective communication between the children’s schools and the home.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children receive specialist help. Staff understand the home’s ethos and encourage children to accept therapeutic support. Staff use therapeutic thinking time to reflect on the care they give children.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Children are held in mind by staff. Staff write notes and letters to children to demonstrate this, and, as a result, some children’s resilience has been strengthened. Staff facilitate visits with children’s families. During the inspection, one child was ‘face timing’ his mother and cooking the evening meal under her guidance. This is a good example of the staff’s emphasis on promoting family relationships. A parent commented, ‘The staff keep me informed. As a mum, I want to know how my son is doing.’
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Some children have developed positive relationships with staff. They described feeling safe and well supported. On occasions, staff’s focus on managing crisis behaviours distracted their attention from the other children, who missed activities.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Risk assessments continue to be generic. Although some work has been undertaken to individualise them, they still do not clearly state specific risks or provide strategies for staff to follow.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Leaders and managers have failed to analyse records of missing incidents to identify patterns and trends. This reduces the opportunity to understand behaviour and implement effective strategies to manage it. Despite one child’s missing episodes escalating, a member of staff left the child unsupervised during an off-site activity, which resulted in the child going missing again. Learning from incidents and events is not evidenced in the children’s records, and opportunities to learn are missed.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
When allegations have been made, they have been reported to the designated officer. Staff know what to report, to whom and when. However, record-keeping is inconsistent. Records sampled varied in quality and clarity. Some were not dated or signed. Records of meetings fail to evidence attendees or actions agreed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
The registered manager is suitably qualified and experienced. Social workers and parents commented positively on her dedication to the children and her clear communication with them. A social worker commented, ‘The manager has been responsive to changing Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 5 care plans. Nothing is too much trouble.’
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Supervision for staff is regular, and decisions and agreed actions are clear. Where issues around staff practice have been identified, supervision records evidence that they have been addressed. Appraisals are conducted annually and provide staff with clear goals to work towards. Consequently, staff are clear about managers’ expectations.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Development of the home has been slow. Leaders and managers attribute this to having to focus on crisis behaviour. However, managers fail to demonstrate lessons learned. Managerial thinking and decision-making are not evidenced in records. Nor is learning from experiences. In discussions, the manager demonstrates that she has the skills for critical thinking. However, she misses the opportunity to demonstrate this clearly through the records.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Managerial monitoring is not fully effective. Some records, such those recording physical interventions, have improved. However, records are not sufficiently clear to allow managers to readily evaluate them. Consequently, key information is missed. In contrast, most serious incident records sampled were clear and show decision-making and evaluation.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good
Advice from a fire expert in January 2018 was not followed promptly. Remedial action to reduce the risk rating of the home from medium to low was not undertaken, despite the registered manager’s requests. However, action was taken during the inspection to rectify this.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 6
p.5
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Channels and Choices Limited
p.6
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 31 St Georges Place, Canterbury, Kent CT1 1XD
p.6
Children’s home details
Responsible individual: Martin Scholfield
p.6
Inspectors
Sarah Olliver, social care inspector Tracey Scott, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC408584 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion