Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Sept 2018
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Hemmings, Mark Carter-Tufnell, Susan Sutton
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SS16 6AZ
- Name on report verified
Lincewood Primary School
- URN verified
134022
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Previously the procedures for raising concerns were not consistently followed and concerns were not systematically recorded. p.4
- Intervention and support from the local authority have rectified weaknesses in safeguarding procedures. p.1
- Leaders have taken swift action to address historical weaknesses that they and the local authority identified in safeguarding practice at the school. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve leadership and management by: – developing the capacity of leaders and governors to manage all aspects of leadership without the need for additional external support – ensuring that governors hold senior leaders effectively to account for all aspects of safeguarding. p.2
- Although leaders have successfully maintained the school’s good standard of education since the last inspection, leadership of the school, including governance, is currently overly reliant on support from the local authority. p.3
- A recent audit by the local authority highlighted serious shortcomings in safeguarding procedures. p.3
- The follow-up guidance has ensured that necessary changes have been instigated and ensured that safeguarding is now effective. p.3
- Leaders monitor the quality of provision well and use performance information to make informed decisions about what to improve. p.3
- Consequently, they have successfully addressed the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection report and continue to sustain a good quality of education for pupils. p.3
- Leaders hold teachers to account and provide effective training to ensure that their strategies are implemented well. p.3
- For example, all teachers have been trained in p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment26
“Most teaching is well structured to ensure that pupils make good progress.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,375
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Lincewood Primary School Berry Lane, Langdon Hills, Basildon, Essex SS16 6AZ
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils of all ages, including children in the early years, make good progress in their learning. This is true regardless of their different starting points. Teachers usually pitch work at the right level so that pupils are stretched in their learning. Pupils are routinely interested and challenged by what they do in school. The school meets the needs of disadvantaged pupils well. Disadvantaged pupils make good progress compared with other pupils nationally. Pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities are well supported. These pupils make progress in line with others in the school. Pupils behave consistently well, both in and out of lessons. Pupils’ personal development is promoted well. They learn to keep healthy and be respectful of others. Pupils are confident learners. Improvements in teaching are well led. Leaders have a clear vision for how pupils should be taught. They have secured teachers’
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
commitment to this. Until recently, governors’ oversight of safeguarding has not been sufficiently rigorous, and staff’s understanding of how to keep pupils safe was not sharp enough. Intervention and support from the local authority have rectified weaknesses in safeguarding procedures. Most teaching is well structured to ensure that pupils make good progress. However, when learning is not well sequenced, pupils are not adequately challenged, particularly in foundation subjects.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership and management by: – developing the capacity of leaders and governors to manage all aspects of leadership without the need for additional external support – ensuring that governors hold senior leaders effectively to account for all aspects of safeguarding. Ensure that time in lessons is used to best effect by: – developing the organisation and sequencing of work so that it consistently builds on pupils’ prior understanding – making sure that teachers consider carefully what pupils already know and are precise about what next steps will help them most, including in foundation subjects – ensuring that all teachers plan work which maintains pupils’ interest and challenges them.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Although leaders have successfully maintained the school’s good standard of education since the last inspection, leadership of the school, including governance, is currently overly reliant on support from the local authority. A recent audit by the local authority highlighted serious shortcomings in safeguarding procedures. The follow-up guidance has ensured that necessary changes have been instigated and ensured that safeguarding is now effective. Leaders monitor the quality of provision well and use performance information to make informed decisions about what to improve. Consequently, they have successfully addressed the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection report and continue to sustain a good quality of education for pupils. Leaders hold teachers to account and provide effective training to ensure that their strategies are implemented well. For example, all teachers have been trained in
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
leaders’ chosen approach to teaching writing. This approach is consistently adopted and is successful in ensuring good outcomes for pupils. Teachers value the professional development they receive. The vast majority of staff who responded to Ofsted’s staff survey said that they think leaders use professional development to encourage, challenge and support teachers’ improvement. Leaders have developed effective curricular programmes which enable pupils to make good progress from the time they join Reception to the end of Year 6. They have secured teachers’ commitment to following these schemes of work accurately. For example, inspectors saw clear evidence of teachers adhering precisely to the school’s phonics scheme. As a consequence, the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check is consistently above the national average. Teachers’ consistent application of leaders’ plans enables leaders to review
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
which approaches work well and to identify when to implement changes. Pupils learn about fundamental British values through personal, social, health and economic education (PSHE) lessons and assemblies. They treat each other with kindness and understand that people are different but equal. Almost all pupils who responded to Ofsted’s survey of their views said that the school encourages them to respect people from other backgrounds and to treat everyone equally. Leaders of provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities ensure that these pupils’ needs are effectively met. The SEN coordinator (SENCo) works closely with teachers, parents and external agencies to ensure that the needs of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are understood. She checks the impact of strategies to support these pupils. For example, she attends all meetings about pupils’ progress and observes lessons that they are part of. Learning support assistants are well trained and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
their positive impact is seen in lessons across the school. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are taught well and make good progress. Leaders make good use of pupil premium funding. Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is monitored carefully through meetings with key staff. Leaders use these meetings to identify when disadvantaged pupils are not achieving as well as they should. They seek to understand why this is and to put in place the help that pupils need. As a result, disadvantaged pupils make progress in line with other pupils nationally. Physical education (PE) and sport premium funding is used well to encourage pupils to participate in physical activity and also to train staff.
p.3
Governance
Governors have a secure understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the quality of teaching pupils receive. They receive regular performance information and check the impact of new initiatives with leaders. They make good use of the educational expertise of individual governors to validate what they are told about the effectiveness of teaching. Governors have a clear understanding of school developments and track their impact well. Until recently, governors have been over-reliant on information they have been given by leaders regarding the safeguarding of pupils. Intervention and guidance from the local authority have clarified the role and responsibility of governors. Additional support from two national leaders of governance has strengthened the work of the governing body.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have taken swift action to address historical weaknesses that they and the local authority identified in safeguarding practice at the school. Previously the procedures for raising concerns were not consistently followed and concerns were not systematically recorded. Governors did not have the necessary oversight of safeguarding matters and information was not shared appropriately. As a result of recent actions safeguarding procedures are fit for purpose. The acting headteacher, supported by an associate headteacher commissioned by the local authority, has worked swiftly and effectively to respond to recommendations made by the local authority. For example, leaders now regularly communicate with, and seek advice from, external agencies. Staff training has been brought up to date and new systems are in place to ensure that any concerns about pupils’ welfare are reported and acted upon appropriately. Staff at
p.4
Safeguarding
all levels in the organisation understand these systems and demonstrate a secure knowledge of how to keep pupils safe. Having now established safe practices, leaders have concrete plans in place to improve further the way they work. Leaders plan to streamline the way that information is recorded and stored. The local authority remains closely involved in developing this aspect of school provision.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teachers typically make good use of time in lessons. They set work which meets the needs of pupils well, taking into account how easy or hard pupils find a particular topic. Most teachers assess how well pupils are learning during lessons and adjust how they teach accordingly. They carefully judge the amount of time pupils spend on different activities, moving pupils on at just the right time, or revisiting topics if pupils’ understanding is insecure. As a result, pupils are interested in the work they do, are enthusiastic about learning, and develop their knowledge and understanding well. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are supported well in lessons. Learning support assistants are skilled at questioning pupils and guiding them to learn. Equipment, such as voice recognition software and laptops, is put to good use to help pupils overcome any barriers they face. As a result, pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities have the
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
same access to the curriculum as other pupils. Over time, most lessons are well sequenced. They lead to clear, logical development of pupils’ knowledge and understanding. For example, the ‘big questions’ pupils complete while studying reading increase in complexity and skill level progressively over time. Across all year groups, the order in which pupils learn and revisit topics provides successful, increasingly sophisticated, coverage of what they need to know. Pupils’ work shows that they understand and learn what they are taught. By the time they finish Year 6 they are well prepared for the move to secondary school. Teachers do not always use their assessment of pupils’ work to extend learning in subjects other than mathematics and English. This means that pupils are sometimes set tasks that are too easy, and revisit work that they can already do well.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils understand how to be successful learners. They are confident in answering questions and share ideas with each other willingly. They are keen to do well, settling quickly to their work. They tackle the different tasks set for them with enthusiasm and show pride in their work. Pupils’ mental and physical well-being is given high priority by leaders. They are taught to keep themselves safe, including online. Pupils learn about how to eat well, and are given a raft of different sporting activities to participate in. Pupils benefit from a wide range of extra-curricular activities. They were effusive when explaining the extra-curricular provision on offer, and several explained how being taught about food had changed their eating habits for the better. The school is a kind and welcoming place. Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe
p.5
Personal development and welfare
from bullying. They explained how they learned about mutual respect and individual liberty and told inspectors that being different is fine. The responses from parents who completed Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, supported this view. Almost all said their children were happy and safe at school.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Around the school, pupils conduct themselves well. They play well together at breaktimes and lunchtimes. When one pupil accidentally knocked another over, for example, he was quick to say sorry while a friend fetched help. Inspectors did not witness any poor behaviour, and almost all parents, and all staff, who responded to Ofsted’s surveys agree that behaviour is well managed. Disruption to learning is rare. Inspectors did not witness any time in lessons where pupils prevented others from learning. Pupils are consistently polite and well mannered. On the rare occasions when pupils are slow to settle to their work or are distracted, this is because teachers do not provide work which is sufficiently challenging for them. Over time, attendance at the school has been broadly in line with the national average. Leaders have identified a recent dip in attendance and are working quickly to address
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Good
In 2017, pupils made good progress through key stage 2 in reading, writing and mathematics. In key stage 1, pupils also made good progress from their starting points. In 2018, provisional data suggests that, although still broadly in line with the national average, there was a dip in pupils’ progress in reading at key stage 2. This followed a change in the way reading is taught. A review of the work of current pupils across Years 1 to 6 supports the school’s progress information in showing that the new method of teaching reading is now embedded. Pupils currently in the school are making good progress in reading. Pupils’ progress at key stages 1 and 2 in mathematics continues to be strong. Pupils make consistent gains in their mathematical skills and understanding through each academic year and across Years 1 to 6. The same is true in writing. In both subjects, this is reflected in the provisional key stage 2 outcomes for 2018, which remain good.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
The proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check has, for some time, been above the national average. This is because of the effectiveness with which teachers apply the school’s chosen scheme of phonics teaching. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are well supported to make good progress. Across the school, they make progress broadly in line with other pupils. Disadvantaged pupils also make good progress when compared to other pupils nationally.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Leaders carefully consider the journey children make through the early years. They provide a strong induction process. They have established a curriculum which ensures an effective balance of activities to develop skills across the areas of learning. Leaders and other adults in the early years establish routines which prepare children well for future learning. Children in the early years are prepared well to progress into key stage 1. Teachers in the early years effectively manage the work of children to ensure that they undertake a range of different activities, making good use of inside and outside learning opportunities. They are well supported by learning support assistants, who guide and assess children’s progress well. As a result, children make good progress though the different areas of early years learning. Children new to Reception soon settle to its routines and socialise with other children
p.6
Early years provision Good
quickly. The impact of this is evident in the way that, at this early stage in the year, children work and play well together. They behave well and approach their learning happily and with confidence. More children in the early years attain a good level of development than the national average. This has been the case for at least four years. Attainment in the specific early learning goals of mathematics, reading and writing has similarly been above the national average. Until 2018, disadvantaged children achieved less well, and fewer of these children reached a good level of development than other children nationally. However, through the academic year of 2017/18, leaders took steps to address this. They provided support which was well tailored to these children’s needs. As a consequence, the proportion of disadvantaged children reaching a good level of development rose to being above the national average for non-disadvantaged children.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Headteacher Mrs Julie Braithwaite (Acting)
p.8
School details
Email address admin@lincewood.essex.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 16–17 October 2014
p.8
Information about this school
Lincewood Primary School is a larger than average primary school. The school is currently led by an acting headteacher with the support of an associate headteacher. The local authority is providing a high level of support to the school. Lincewood Primary School has an average proportion of pupils who have been eligible for free school meals in the last six years. The proportion of pupils who receive support for SEN and/or disabilities is lower than the national average, while the proportion who have an education, health and care plan is above average. The proportion of pupils whose first language is not English is broadly in line with the national average.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met with the acting headteacher, associate headteacher, senior leaders and members of the governing body. They also spoke with representatives from the local authority. Inspectors visited 34 classes, sometimes accompanied by leaders, reviewed the work of pupils in their books and listened to pupils read. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including leaders’ evaluation of the school and their improvement plans, a safeguarding audit conducted by the local authority, the school’s safeguarding records, staff induction documentation and documents demonstrating the work of governors. Inspectors considered the school’s information on pupils’ progress, attendance, behaviour and exclusions. Inspectors considered the 63 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the 62 responses by parents to the free-text option. Inspectors considered the 85 responses to Ofsted’s pupil survey and the 33 responses to the staff survey. They
p.9
Information about this inspection
spoke with parents before the start of the school day and with pupils during the inspection. Inspectors also spoke with a range of staff during the inspection.
p.9
Inspection team
Andrew Hemmings, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Mark Carter-Tufnell Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion