Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Maiden Erlegh School

Inspected 12 Sept 2018 · published 18 Oct 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Sept 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Rouse, Mark Bagust

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RG6 7HS

  • Name on report verified

    Maiden Erlegh School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongexcellenthighly effectiveimprovedeffectiveexceptionalconsistentlyexemplary
Criticismweaknessconcernsconcernnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1075w+82
  • What needs to improve80w+73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,146
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mary Davies Chief Executive Officer Maiden Erlegh Trust and Headteacher Maiden Erlegh School Maiden Erlegh School Silverdale Road Earley Reading Berkshire RG6 7HS

p.1

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

Following my visit to the school on 12 September 2018 with Sarah Hubbard, Her Majesty’s Inspector, and James Rouse, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I am of the opinion that the school has demonstrated strong practice and marked improvement in specific areas. This may indicate that the school has improved significantly overall. Therefore, I am recommending that the school’s next inspection be a section 5 inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

Your approach to leadership is characterised by a relentless pursuit of high standards in all areas of school life. Effective leadership ensures that the quality of teaching, learning and assessment is strong. As a result, pupils make excellent progress across all areas of the curriculum and achieve GCSE results which are well above the national averages. This drive is well balanced with a clear commitment to the welfare of pupils and staff. Consequently, there is a very positive learning culture in the school. Pupils from a range of backgrounds thrive.

p.1

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

Staff feel valued and empowered. Those who met with inspectors, and/or completed the staff survey, were remarkably positive about the school. All feel proud to work at the school and that it is well led and managed. The school’s successes have been recognised nationally, including through its teaching school status. Leadership capacity has been strengthened to guard against a loss of momentum within the school as its influence in the local area grows. The work of the inclusion centre is particularly impressive, ensuring that vulnerable pupils receive personalised help to meet a range of complex needs. As a result, many pupils who access this provision make exceptional progress. Many parents and carers wrote to inspectors in appreciation of the support provided for their children, often in difficult circumstances. Pupils value the strong relationships and the support they receive from staff. The great majority who completed our survey

p.1

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

reported that they enjoy school, learn well and feel they are listened to. Notably, a very high number of pupils strongly agreed that they are encouraged to respect people from different backgrounds. The behaviour of pupils in lessons and around the school is excellent.

p.2

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

The board of trustees provides highly effective support and challenge to school leaders. Trustees know their roles well and strong communication ensures that they have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and priorities. The local advisory board champions hold leaders effectively to account for each aspect of the school’s work and ensure that the impact of improvement plans is evaluated rigorously. Significantly, trustees have worked effectively with you to reduce the school’s budget deficit in a way that has not jeopardised standards.

p.2

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

Leaders’ actions have ensured that all of the recommendations from the previous inspection have been addressed. Any areas of relative weakness are quickly identified and actions are taken to address them. For example, leaders are aware that standards in a small number of foundation subjects do not presently match those in other areas and are reviewing why some girls in key stage 3 are not currently making strong progress in English.

p.2

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

Safeguarding is effective. Trustees and the leadership team make sure that safeguarding arrangements are robust and rigorous. All staff receive appropriate training that ensures that they know how to keep pupils safe. Leaders help parents to be kept well informed of potential risks, for example by sending regular emails and providing comprehensive information on the school website. Parents who responded to the online survey overwhelmingly agreed that their children feel safe and are well cared for in school.

p.2

Short inspection of Maiden Erlegh School

Dedicated and highly skilled pastoral staff work determinedly and sensitively alongside parents and external agencies to support pupils whose circumstances make them vulnerable. Pupils told inspectors that staff are approachable and that they know an adult they can turn to if they have concerns. Pupils appreciate the concern that staff members have for their welfare and well-being.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Pupils currently at the school make strong progress across the curriculum. At this point in the term, Year 11 pupils are working at similar standards to last year’s very successful cohort. Disadvantaged pupils, particularly those in key stage 3, make remarkably good progress. The quality of work produced in science, geography and art is particularly impressive.  The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is consistently strong. Teachers use their secure knowledge about their subject and pupils to plan highly effective learning opportunities. They use questioning increasingly well to challenge pupils and probe their understanding. Opportunities for pupils to revisit and consolidate their learning are carefully planned so that their knowledge and understanding develop successfully over time. Staff feel well supported and take part in a range of developmental activities that improve their practice. Leaders use school

p.2

Inspection findings

systems well to check that teaching remains consistently effective.  The curriculum is carefully considered, well planned and kept under close review. The pathways programme provides appropriate choices for pupils matched to their needs and interests. Opportunities for pupils’ personal, social, moral, spiritual and cultural (SMSC) education are well developed. For example, key stage 3 pupils spoke with enthusiasm about the volunteering projects in the local community that every pupil takes part in. The careers education programme is exemplary, providing pupils with opportunities to work with a wide range of local employers.  Sixth-form outcomes are typically strong, ensuring that students are very well prepared for their next steps. Leaders’ actions have improved the curriculum, teaching standards and guidance for students. As a result, students’ progress on A-level courses is now above the national average and attendance and retention

p.3

Inspection findings

rates have improved. Vulnerable and disadvantaged students are particularly well supported through the mentoring programme and close family liaison.  The taught curriculum in the sixth form is supported by a strong programme of personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education. Students benefit from a range of leadership opportunities within the school and local community. Almost all sixth-form students take part in relevant work experience placements.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the excellent teaching that exists in most areas of the school is firmly embedded throughout, particularly in some option subjects, so that pupils’ achievements remain consistently strong.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wokingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

My colleagues and I held meetings with you, other leaders, staff and trustees. We spoke to groups of pupils formally and informally. We visited several classes to observe learning, looked at the quality of work in pupils’ books and observed them at breaktimes and lunchtime. A range of documents were considered, including leaders’ self-evaluation, safeguarding, current pupils’ progress and the work of trustees. The team took account of responses to the Ofsted online survey, Parent View (106 responses), and outcomes of the staff survey (92 responses) and pupil survey (292 responses). In addition, the lead inspector took account of 25 letters written by parents which were received on the day of the inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion