Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Shenley Brook End School

Inspected 25 Sept 2018 · published 17 Oct 2018 · URN 136730

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 Sept 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Powell

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    MK5 7ZT

  • Name on report verified

    Shenley Brook End School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongvery wellpositiveimprovedwell supportedeffectivelystronglypositively
Criticismat riskpersistent absenceweakdeclinetoo slowharmexclusionsslowly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1127w+56
  • What needs to improve97w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,211
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr C. Holmwood Headteacher Shenley Brook End School Walbank Grove Shenley Brook End Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK5 7ZT

p.1

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

Following my visit to the school on 25 September 2018 with Ian Tustian and Patrick Taylor, Ofsted Inspectors, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since your school was judged to be good in January 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

You have been in post since 1 September 2018. However, your previous position as deputy headteacher in the school has furnished you with a wide knowledge and understanding of the school’s context. Consequently, you know your school very well and your determination to provide the best standard of education for each pupil is clear. You are well supported in this by the chief executive officer of the recently formed 5 Dimensions multi-academy trust, of which your school is a part, by your leadership team, your staff and by an experienced governing body. You have accurately identified areas of recent underperformance and have taken, and continue to take, appropriate actions to bring about improvements.

p.1

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

You promote a model of leadership throughout the school which is underpinned by your philosophy of a ‘school of leaders’. Leaders at different levels have been given autonomy to make choices to meet the best interests of the pupils. Leaders have welcomed this opportunity and have responded positively. For example, in the selection of the most appropriate exam courses and assessment practice.

p.1

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

You and your staff effectively promote the school’s core values through a framework of ‘Attitudes, Skills and Knowledge’. You set high levels of expectation and aspiration, to which pupils respond well. The learning environment is calm and well ordered, offering a range of facilities for the pupils, which they use to good effect. Pupils’ behaviour is good, both in the classrooms and other areas. Pupils wear the school uniform with pride. Parents are strongly positive in their views of the school. One parent commented, ‘There is a genuine care by the staff for the children.’ Another said, ‘I am very pleased with the leadership and ethos of the school.’

p.1

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

You and your staff provide a range of extra-curricular opportunities for the pupils, which they value highly. These include sports, performing arts and The Duke of Edinburgh Award activities. All of these contribute to the positive culture within the school.

p.2

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

At the school’s last inspection, inspectors noted many strengths. They also challenged school leaders to improve the level of challenge in science and humanities, and to ensure that teachers’ marking and feedback was of a consistently high standard. In addition, leaders were charged with increasing the proportion of sixth-form students gaining at least a grade C when they retake mathematics GCSE. Most of these points for improvement have been met fully. However, improvements secured in science at key stage 4 and geography in key stages 4 and 5 remain a priority, as they have been too slow to take effect.

p.2

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

A positive culture of safeguarding runs throughout the school that ensures that pupils are safe and secure. This is well supported by robust systems and procedures that meet statutory requirements and are fit for purpose. Pupils say that they feel very safe in the school, and their parents strongly agree. One pupil commented, ‘There is trust in the relationships between teachers and students.’

p.2

Short inspection of Shenley Brook End School

Your designated safeguarding lead is effectively supported by a deputy and other trained staff. Recruitment procedures are thorough because leaders and governors have been appropriately trained in safer recruitment. Safeguarding training for staff is both comprehensive and regular. Staff who join the school mid-year receive appropriate safeguarding training as part of their induction programme. In addition, leaders provide regular training relating to any changes to safeguarding practices as required, including child protection. Consequently, your staff are aware of the signs to look out for that may indicate a pupil is at risk of harm, and they know what action to take when necessary to support vulnerable pupils.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We discussed your evaluation of the school’s effectiveness and agreed the key areas we would focus on during the inspection. These included:  the extent to which leaders have improved the quality of teaching and learning to bring about improvements in progress and outcomes in science, languages and humanities, including those of disadvantaged pupils  how successful leaders have been in sustaining the improving levels of attendance and reducing the incidence of persistent absence and fixed-term exclusions  the extent to which leaders have maintained and improved outcomes in the sixth form.  Pupils’ attainment and progress at the end of key stage 4 in recent years have been strong, with overall progress in 2017 well above the national average. Information from leaders indicate pupils attained similarly well this year.  In 2017, the overall progress of disadvantaged pupils in the school matched that

p.2

Inspection findings

of other pupils with similar starting points nationally. Information provided by the school for 2018 indicates a similar position.  You have recently established an inclusion centre in the school to provide support for those pupils deemed to be at higher risk of exclusion. This is having a beneficial effect for those pupils. One pupil commented that he was very appreciative of the support provided in the centre and that his behaviour and attendance had improved.  The proportion of students who retake and achieve a grade C in mathematics GCSE has increased since the last inspection. This has been achieved by providing targeted intervention and support to enable these students to improve their grades.  Outcomes in the sixth form remain very positive, with strong improvements made in performances at A level in a range of subjects in the last year. Leaders have set high levels of expectation, to which students have responded very well. Most

p.3

Inspection findings

students achieved or exceeded A level target grades in a range of subjects, although performance in geography were comparatively weak.  Inspectors found that pupils have made comparatively slower progress in languages, science and geography in recent years. Inspection evidence from work scrutiny, learning walks and discussions with pupils indicated that outcomes in languages and geography are improving slowly. The rate of improvement in science is faster. However, all three areas remain as priorities for continued and sustained improvement.  Attendance overall in the last academic year showed a slight decline compared to the strong levels of attendance in the previous year. The levels of persistent absence followed a similar pattern. Leaders have identified the reasons for this decline and are taking effective action to secure sustainable improvements.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 actions taken to improve levels of attendance produce the required impact  the quality of teaching in science and geography mirrors best practice elsewhere within the school so that pupils’ outcomes in these subjects compare equally favourably with those they achieve in other curriculum areas. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Milton Keynes. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I met with you at the start of the day when we discussed your evaluation of the school’s effectiveness and agreed the key areas the inspectors would focus on during the inspection. During the day, inspectors held further discussions with you, your senior leaders, governors, staff and pupils.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors accompanied by you and your senior leaders visited 24 lessons. In addition, a selection of pupils’ work was scrutinised jointly with school leaders. Inspectors took account of 79 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and considered written comments from 76 parents. Inspectors also considered 107 staff responses, and 203 responses from pupils on the online questionnaires. Inspectors visited tutor groups, and met with pupils in key stages 3, 4 and 5. In addition, we analysed a wide range of the school’s documentation, including leaders’ checks on pupils’ progress, attendance and behaviour information, minutes of governors’ meetings, and safeguarding policies and procedures.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion