Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Michael Faraday School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Sept 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
David Lloyd
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SE17 2HR
- Name on report verified
Michael Faraday School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language5
“Teachers typically challenge pupils to be more ambitious in their use of vocabulary.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,324
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ms Karen Fowler Headteacher Michael Faraday School Portland Street Walworth London SE17 2HR
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
Following my visit to the school on 25 September 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
You are passionate in your work to motivate all pupils to want to learn and gain a wider knowledge of the world. This is successfully achieved through the rich and varied curriculum that senior leaders have developed. As a result, pupils enjoy regular visits to places of interest and learn from a wide range of visitors who come to the school. Activities offered through the wider curriculum contribute well to their learning. Pupils use these rich experiences in their daily activities. For example, after working with a theatre company, some pupils enjoyed performing short plays to others in an outdoor space during their break. High-quality examples of pupils’ work from a range of subjects are displayed around the school, giving pupils a sense of pride and achievement. As a result, pupils are excited by learning and respond to challenges enthusiastically, which contributes well to the progress they make across the curriculum. Parents and carers agree, with one parent saying,
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
‘Every day my children are inspired. They learn and achieve.’
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
You and your leaders ensure that the school is a nurturing environment where everyone is valued. This contributes effectively to pupils’ well-being and to their confidence that adults will help them if they have any concerns. As a result, pupils are courteous and polite and work well with each other.
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
Leaders and governors have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. However, a lack of clarity around some of the roles and responsibilities of the leadership team is limiting the impact of the good work that the school is doing. Leaders agreed that work is needed to review some of these roles and responsibilities so that all aspects of the school’s work can continue to improve.
p.1
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
School leaders have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that records are detailed and of a high quality. Staff know what to do if they have any concerns about a pupil’s welfare. Records show that leaders follow up any issues swiftly, working well with external agencies to support vulnerable pupils.
p.2
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
The single central record is maintained to a high standard. Pre-employment checks are carried out in accordance with requirements to ensure that staff and volunteers are suitable to work in the school. These checks are accurately recorded.
p.2
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
Systems to monitor school attendance are effective and staff robustly follow up any pupils who do not attend regularly. As a result, attendance is above the national average.
p.2
Short inspection of Michael Faraday School
The pupils I spoke to say they feel safe at this school and all parents who answered Ofsted’s online questionnaire agreed. Pupils say that they understand about different sorts of bullying, including online bullying, and that incidents of bullying are rare. However, if it does happen, they say they know they can talk to an adult and it will get dealt with quickly. Pupils are taught how to stay safe in a range of contexts and, as a result, they say they know how to make sensible choices and that helps them stay safe out of school.
p.2
Inspection findings
The first focus of the inspection was to investigate how successfully leaders are supporting teachers to improve the achievement of disadvantaged pupils in reading. This was because, in 2018, there was a dip in progress for disadvantaged pupils in comparison to others nationally. You and your leadership team have been quick to identify this and have introduced a number of strategies to improve outcomes for pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. These strategies include focused sessions to develop vocabulary so that pupils can more effectively infer and deduce the meaning of a text. You have also introduced a wider variety of books in order to stimulate interest in reading. As a result, pupils say they enjoy reading more now than they used to. Pupils I heard read, including disadvantaged pupils, read with confidence and expression. They say they are developing a love for literature and have opinions
p.2
Inspection findings
about their favourite author, which they are able to justify. For example, one pupil said, ‘I like books by David Walliams because the words he chooses are funny.’ If they come across a word they do not know, many pupils are able to work out the meaning from the context. However, some disadvantaged pupils find some words more difficult to read and understand than their peers do. This is limiting their progress. While new strategies are beginning to have an impact, leaders agreed that more work is needed to further develop the vocabulary of disadvantaged pupils. For the second key line of enquiry, we focused on how successfully leaders are supporting teachers in improving the achievement of most-able pupils in writing in key stage 1. This was because, in recent years, fewer pupils achieved greater depth than the national average. Work in pupils’ books shows that you have been successful in developing pupils’
p.2
Inspection findings
neat and fluent handwriting. This enables pupils to routinely present their work well. Teachers typically challenge pupils to be more ambitious in their use of vocabulary. This is having a positive impact on the quality of their writing, with pupils beginning to choose words for their effect on the reader. For example, one pupil wrote, ‘Trevor is adorable.’ Teachers regularly give pupils opportunities to write at length. This enables pupils, particularly most-able pupils, to demonstrate effectively that they are building up their writing skills quickly. For example, the fluency of their writing is improving as their use of punctuation is becoming more accurate over time. As a result, the books show that most-able pupils make strong progress over time. The third area we agreed to investigate was how successfully leaders use the curriculum to support deep learning in all subjects. We agreed to investigate this
p.3
Inspection findings
because the information on the school’s website suggested that this may be a strength of the school. From the review of curriculum plans, the learning environment and displays and work in books, there are many examples of pupils studying a range of subjects. Teachers plan carefully in order to develop skills and knowledge progressively. They choose demanding tasks which enable pupils to produce work of a high standard. Teachers regularly give pupils opportunities to deepen their learning by using and applying what they have learned. For example, some pupils were asked to reflect on how successful a science investigation had been, which resulted in them designing a test that was more effective. The school successfully uses the curriculum to motivate pupils to learn. It makes use of the rich environmental and cultural resources of London. Regular opportunities to work with specialists, such as actors from a theatre group,
p.3
Inspection findings
enhance and deepen the learning experiences pupils have. Pupils say they enjoy the opportunities offered by the broader curriculum, such as playing in a brass band and singing in the choir, which recently performed in the Tower of London. As one pupil put it, ‘Learning is exciting and the visits help me to understand things better.’
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
the differences between disadvantaged pupils and others nationally in reading diminish through further work to develop their vocabulary the roles and responsibilities of the leadership team are reviewed so that all aspects of the school’s work can continue to improve.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Southwark. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I met with you, the deputy headteacher, the assistant headteacher, the school’s office manager and the chair and the vice-chair of the governing body. I visited lessons with the assistant headteacher. I reviewed work in pupils’ books at key stages 1 and 2, including that of most-able pupils. I listened to pupils from Years 3, 4, 5 and 6 read. I observed pupils’ behaviour around the school and at playtime. I talked to pupils about their learning and talked to them informally in the playground. I talked with a range of staff. I evaluated a range of documents, including the school’s improvement plan, the school’s self-evaluation documents and safeguarding records. I considered 22 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for parents and 16 responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion