Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Gregory's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 19 Sept 2018 · published 16 Oct 2018 · URN 101923

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Sept 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Abdul-Hayee Murshad, Jude Wilson, Milan Stevanovic, Sarah Lack

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    W5 1SL

  • Name on report verified

    St Gregory’s Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    101923

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongenjoyeffectiveconsistentlyeffectivelysecurepositiveimproved
Criticismrequires improvementnot alwaysweaknessesconcernsdeclinenot cleartoo slowseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings799w+4
  • Leadership142w−36
  • Safeguarding128w+38
  • What needs to improve1665w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,659
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 49%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

St Gregory’s Catholic Primary School Woodfield Road, Ealing, London W5 1SL

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils’ outcomes and the quality of teaching and learning require improvement across the school.  The school has new priorities for improvement since the previous inspection. Although leaders’ actions are starting to secure improvements, strategies are not fully embedded and, thus, there is too little impact.  Outcomes in writing at the end of key stage 2 have been well below national averages for some time. Leaders have not acted promptly and do not have a clear strategy to address this decline.  Leaders do not review the impact of their actions carefully enough. As a result, improvement planning is not sharply focused, and progress in some areas has been slow.  Many activities in lessons are not purposeful and waste valuable learning time. Teachers do not ensure that work is suitable to move all pupils on in their learning.  Middle-attaining pupils do not make as much progress as they should. Tasks are not always

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

appropriate to their ability, and pupils do work that does not stretch them.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The new headteacher has addressed areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. Governors, staff, parents, carers and pupils hold her in high regard, and value the work she has done to improve the school.  Pupils are polite, caring and respectful to adults and to each other. They embody the Christian values of the school, which are at the heart of the school’s work. Pupils enjoy coming to school and attendance is high.  The early years provision is a warm and welcoming environment in which children thrive. Staff plan interesting activities which encourage children to be curious and active learners.  There are some areas of strong teaching and learning in the school. The most able pupils are challenged sufficiently, and make strong progress as a result.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Leaders, including those responsible for governance, must: – be more rigorous in the accuracy of their self-evaluation and use this to focus sharply on areas for improvement – monitor and review the impact of their actions robustly to ensure that they secure sustained improvements over time – have a clear strategy, which is shared with all staff, on how to improve pupils’ progress and attainment in writing.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and outcomes by: – planning activities which are purposeful and meet the needs of pupils – ensuring that middle-attaining pupils are challenged sufficiently so that more can achieve the higher standard in English and mathematics.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders are taking effective action to improve the school. However, many of their initiatives are new and need more time to have a positive impact. The pace of improvement in some areas has been too slow, and leaders have not acted swiftly enough to address these.  Development plans are not specific enough to secure sustained improvement over time. Leaders do not review the impact of their actions precisely, which means that planning is not sharply focused on key priorities. As a result, leaders and staff do not have a clear understanding of how weaknesses are being addressed.  The school has undergone a period of some change. Several teachers have left, and leadership and management roles have been restructured. Leaders have new priorities to address before the school can further improve, and are open and honest about what needs to be done.  The new headteacher has taken decisive action to address the areas for improvement

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

identified at the previous inspection. She is well respected by the school community and leads with determination. Many parents and staff told governors that the new head is ‘a breath of fresh air’ in the school.  Leaders have put in place systems to track pupils’ progress accurately. Leaders now analyse pupils’ performance information and have started to use it to identify any underachievement. Pupil progress meetings are increasingly focused, and leaders hold teachers to account rigorously. Leaders and staff are now in a position to refine their use of performance information to ensure that it makes a positive difference to pupils’ learning.  Senior leaders have invested in their middle leaders, and this has paid off. Middle leaders are increasingly accountable for their areas of responsibility, and work well as a team. They monitor their teams carefully, checking that staff consistently implement

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

school policies, such as the improved system of giving feedback to pupils on their work. Staff, including teachers new to the profession, feel well supported.  Pupil premium funding is used effectively and has a positive impact on disadvantaged pupils’ outcomes and personal development. There are still differences in some year groups and subjects, but outcomes are improving for this group of pupils.  The provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is a strength. Leaders and staff consistently promote a deep understanding of and respect for people of all faiths and backgrounds. The Christian values of the school underpin everything that the school does, and are closely linked to British values. Pupils develop a strong moral code, and appreciate the need to help others who are less fortunate. They enjoy organising and taking part in weekly mass, and have plenty of opportunities to reflect

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

on their own and other faiths.  The curriculum is rich and stimulating. Pupils are increasingly able to develop their knowledge and skills across a breadth of subjects. They have many opportunities to extend their learning beyond the classroom through well-considered activities and visits, such as geography field trips, trips to the science museum and a French café run by Year 6 pupils.  Leaders provide pupils with a range of extra-curricular clubs. Music is an important part of the school, and pupils enjoy the opportunities to perform as part of the choir or orchestra, for example.  The provision for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is well led. Additional funding is spent effectively, and pupils receive high-quality support. Leaders monitor and review interventions regularly to ensure that pupils’ specific needs are being met.  Leaders make good use of the primary physical education and sport premium funding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

The additional money has improved the quality of sports provision at the school, such as through additional lunchtime activities and increased participation in sports competitions. Leaders have also used the funding to develop staff’s ability to deliver high-quality physical education.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governance has changed significantly since the previous inspection, following an external review. Many new governors are in place and bring a range of experience and valuable skills to the governing body. Committees have been restructured so that governors can focus on specific areas of the school’s work. Governors are fully aware of their roles and take their responsibilities very seriously.  Governors are highly supportive of school leaders, and have started to ask more challenging questions. They are knowledgeable about the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and take an active part in school life.  However, governors do not challenge school leaders enough on pupils’ performance information. This means that governors do not hold leaders stringently to account. They are unclear on why outcomes in writing, for example, have not improved. This is because school leaders’ actions have not been reviewed rigorously.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The school site is secure. Pupils are aware that school rules are in place to keep them safe, and they follow these rules, such as respecting the boundaries of the playground. They are also taught how to stay safe online and in the local area.  Pre-recruitment checks on the suitability of staff meet requirements. Leaders ensure that all staff receive up-to-date training, and that they follow school procedures for recording any concerns. Any referrals are made swiftly, and leaders are tenacious in ensuring that pupils and families receive the help and support they need.  Parents unanimously agree that their children are safe at school. They talk very positively about the care and guidance their children receive at school.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not good across different year groups and subjects, particularly in key stage 2.  At times, pupils are not clear about what they are learning or why they are doing certain tasks. This is because lessons are not always well planned to ensure that pupils can build on prior learning and make progress.  The school’s ‘3 tier challenge’ system is used in all lessons, but not always to good effect. Middle-attaining pupils do not always receive sufficient challenge and are not directed to more stretching tasks that would help them to make better progress.  Where teaching is stronger, teachers have secure subject knowledge and develop pupils’ understanding through effective questioning. They use assessment information to inform their planning and tailor the work to meet the needs of pupils. This means that pupils do work suitable for their ability and can move forward in their learning.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teachers have established clear routines and strategies to ensure that lessons are not disrupted by poor behaviour. Pupils rise to the teachers’ high expectations of behaviour, and strong relationships between staff and pupils are evident.  The inclusive nature of the school ensures that pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are well supported in their learning. Teachers deploy support staff effectively and monitor the impact of additional support.  Teachers are well trained in supporting pupils who speak English as an additional language. They set appropriate tasks and often ask native speakers to help these pupils with their understanding when they first join the school.  Effective phonics teaching ensures that pupils can use their knowledge to sound out and read words. Pupils enjoy reading and read with confidence. Additional support is provided for pupils who struggle with reading, and this is proving to be highly effective.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Mathematics is generally well taught. Teachers model the steps pupils need to take in solving complex problems, for example, and make sure that pupils can apply their prior learning.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils work well together and show enthusiasm for their learning. They listen to each other’s viewpoints and share ideas. Inspectors were impressed by the levels of maturity shown by some pupils.  Pupils focus well on tasks, often for sustained periods of time. They generally take pride in their work.  The school has good systems in place to deal with any friendship issues or concerns that pupils may have. Leaders provide counselling and a ‘drop in’ service for pupils, where they can talk about their worries or problems. Older pupils act as mentors for younger pupils, and pupils demonstrate genuine concern for and empathy towards each other.  Pupils have a good understanding of British values and how they are tied to the Christian ethos of the school. They talked to inspectors about the benefits of having people from different backgrounds at the school. One pupil said: ‘We welcome different

p.5

Personal development and welfare

children to our school because Jesus wanted us to do so.’  Pupils value the culture of celebration within the school. They are motivated to work hard, help each other and care for others through the various rewards on offer, such as ‘St Gregory’s Angels’.  Pupils have plentiful opportunities to take on responsibilities, such as house captains, cyber mentors and contributing to collective worship. This helps them to become confident and responsible members of the community. The school council is held in high esteem and pupils say that staff listen to their ideas.  Staff ensure that pupils have a smooth transition to the next stage of their education. For example, the school has good links with a local secondary school, and arranges visits so that pupils can get used to a different environment.  Bullying is rare. If it does happen, pupils are confident that staff or the pupil mentors deal with any incidents straight away.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils are polite and courteous. They are happy at school, and eager to talk about their lessons and experiences.  There is a calm and orderly atmosphere both in and around the school. Pupils look smart in their uniforms and are proud of their school.  Attendance is consistently above the national average. No groups of pupils are disadvantaged by poor attendance because of the successful strategies employed by the school.  The school has clear behaviour systems in place which are followed. In the last academic year, fixed-term exclusions rose sharply. Where there is challenging behaviour due to some pupils’ complex needs, staff have taken advice from external agencies and acted accordingly.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ progress over time is not strong. Leaders and staff are beginning to address any inconsistencies, particularly at key stage 1. However, more work is required to ensure that pupils make securely good progress.  Leaders have not taken effective steps to halt the decline in writing outcomes across key stage 2. In the past three years, Year 6 pupils made much less progress compared to their peers nationally. Not enough pupils attained the expected standard. While the current picture is improving, this has not happened quickly enough to secure good outcomes in writing.  Work in pupils’ books accurately reflects teachers’ assessments. This shows that there are differences between pupils’ outcomes in a range of subjects. This is particularly the case in key stage 2.  In reading and mathematics, pupils make average progress by the end of key stage 2. This includes disadvantaged pupils and the most able pupils. Attainment in these

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

subjects is consistently above national averages, including at the higher standard. However, middle-attaining pupils make less progress than other pupils do from the same starting points nationally.  Standards in key stage 1 have improved since the previous inspection. Attainment is above the national average at the expected standard. Current assessment information and work in pupils’ books show clear improvement for the most able pupils in key stage 1.  Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities make good progress because of the individual support they receive. Staff and teaching assistants know how to best support pupils’ needs.  Pupils attain well in science across the school. This is a popular subject, and pupils enjoy the investigative nature of their learning.  Leaders acted promptly to address the dip in outcomes in the 2017 Year 1 phonics screening check. A high proportion of pupils achieved the expected standard.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 The early years environment, both indoors and outdoors, is vibrant and stimulating. The space is well organised and encourages children’s development in all areas of learning. Activities are well thought out and cater for children’s interests.  Children are safe and secure. They are happy to play with each other or on their own, and take turns with toys and resources. Children are generally confident and keen to talk about their learning.  Teaching is typically strong. Staff work closely with each other so that children get the same quality of activity and learning opportunities in each Reception class. Staff plan imaginative tasks that have a strong focus on developing pupils’ reading, writing and mathematical skills.  Staff make sure that parents and carers are involved in their child’s learning. Parents spend time with their children when they first join the early years to ensure that they are settled.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Children come into the early years typically at age-related expectations. They make consistently strong progress and enter Year 1 ready to learn. This includes the high proportion of children who speak English as an additional language.  A small number of children who have SEN and/or disabilities are well supported. Staff work with external agencies and parents to ensure that their needs are met effectively.  Leaders have an accurate understanding of the quality of provision in the early years. They are quick to identify any weaknesses and take effective action to ensure that children’s good outcomes are maintained. Leaders have a clear plan to improve outcomes for disadvantaged children and boys so that more of them achieve a good level of development by the end of Reception.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address mkolanowska@st-gregorys.ealing.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 14–15 June 2016

p.8

Information about this school

 St Gregory’s Catholic Primary School is larger than the average-sized primary school. The early years provision comprises a Nursery class and two Reception classes.  A new headteacher took up post in September 2016.  The school belongs to the Ealing Catholic Deanery Group. A section 48 inspection of the school was completed in October 2016.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is below that of other schools.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited all classes in the school to observe teaching and learning across a range of subjects. All of these observations were done jointly with school leaders.  Inspectors reviewed pupils’ learning over time through scrutiny of pupils’ books during visits to classrooms, and in a meeting with school leaders. Inspectors also spoke with pupils about their experiences at the school, and listened to pupils from Year 3 read.  Meetings were held with leaders to discuss their evaluation of the school’s effectiveness and the impact of their work. Discussions were held with members of staff, including those at the early stages of their teaching career, and teaching assistants.  Inspectors discussed aspects of the school’s work with governors and the local authority officer linked to the school.  The inspection team reviewed a range of school documentation, including external reviews of the school, information about pupils’ progress and attainment, safeguarding

p.9

Information about this inspection

records and procedures, behaviour records and attendance information.  Inspectors spoke to parents informally before school, and took account of the 87 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey for parents. Inspectors also considered the 40 responses to the staff survey.

p.9

Inspection team

Jude Wilson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

Abdul-Hayee Murshad Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion