Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Oct 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Shaw (lead), Lee Elliott, Lynne Selkirk

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lee Elliott, Lynne Selkirk, Steve Shaw

  • Postcode verified

    YO25 5HR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedsafestronghigh-qualityfeel safeconfidentrobust
Criticismconcernconcernsnot alwaysseriousweaknessesbelowexclusionsmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1210w−7
  • What needs to improve67w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,275
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 95%What needs to improve 5%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr S Ratheram Executive Principal Driffield School and Sixth Form Manorfield Road Driffield YO25 5HR

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Driffield School and Sixth Form

Following my visit with Steve Shaw, Her Majesty’s Inspector, Jennifer Cave and Lynne Selkirk, Ofsted Inspectors, to your school on 18 September 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Driffield School and Sixth Form

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The unannounced inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements, the quality of leadership and management and pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare at the school.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors scrutinised systems in place to check that adults in the school are safe to work with children. They also scrutinised other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection. They met with the executive principal, chief executive officer (CEO) and CEO designate of the Education Alliance multi-academy trust. Inspectors also met with groups of pupils, other senior leaders and a group of subject leaders.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors scrutinised the school’s attendance records, behaviour logs and communication with external agencies. Inspectors observed pupils at the start and end of the school day. Members of the team observed pupils working in lessons and talked to groups of pupils informally at break and lunchtime.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Context

Driffield School and Sixth Form is much larger than the average-size school. It became a sponsor-led academy in February 2017. Most pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged or who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is below average. The executive principal joined the school in May 2018.

p.2

Inspection findings

There is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. There is an ‘it can happen here’ attitude from all staff and pupils. Staff receive regular safeguarding training. Leaders ensure that all staff receive, and understand, the most recent statutory guidance relating to safeguarding and protecting children. Staff attend weekly briefings where they hear safeguarding updates, concerns with pupils or emerging risks that are pertinent to the locality.

p.2

Inspection findings

Leaders listen carefully to the opinions and concerns of all pupils. For example, some pupils reported that the tight corridors and narrow stairs made them anxious when overcrowded. Accordingly, leaders changed the way they dismiss pupils from lessons in areas where pupils reported the most congestion. However, a minority of pupils told inspectors that there are still a few ‘hot-spots’ where movement up and down stairs is still a cause for concern. Leaders intend to further review pupil movement around the school to address this matter.

p.2

Inspection findings

There is a high staff presence during break and lunchtime. The vast majority of pupils say that they feel safe. They told inspectors that there are many staff in the school that they could speak to if they had a concern about themselves or a friend. Pupils have a thorough understanding of the different forms of bullying. They say that some bullying does occur, mainly name-calling, but that systems are in place that enable pupils to report bullying anonymously. Furthermore, pupils are confident that any issues are dealt with in a timely manner and that they are resolved most of the time.

p.2

Inspection findings

Leaders with responsibility for safeguarding know their roles well. Systems are in place that allow staff to record any ‘nagging doubts’ about a pupil’s welfare or more serious matters. Leaders respond swiftly and appropriately when staff report a concern. They have built effective relationships with external agencies such as the police and local doctor’s surgery. This enables leaders to call upon additional professional support for pupils if needed. Leaders conduct robust checks on all staff, including temporary contractors who were on site during the inspection. Such checks ensure that children are safe. Inspection evidence demonstrates that some pupils’ understanding of how to stay safe outside of school is less developed. In addition, a small minority of pupils in key stage 3 participate in overly boisterous play-fighting during break. Some teachers do not always notice or take effective action to stop this.

p.2

Inspection findings

Leaders’ plans to improve the school are well-aligned to the findings of this inspection. This demonstrates that the executive principal and members of the trust have an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Together, the executive principal and other senior leaders have started to improve aspects of the school’s provision that were well overdue. For example, staff and pupils told inspectors that the standard of pupils’ behaviour was much higher this academic year. They suggest that this is, in part, due to the new positive discipline policy introduced by leaders at the start of September 2018. Although in its infancy, most staff apply the new policy consistently. Pupils are eager to do as their teachers ask so they can receive reward stamps in their planners. Pupils wear their new uniform with pride and come prepared for learning with the correct equipment. During the inspection the vast majority of pupils were courteous and welcoming and

p.3

Inspection findings

some politely held open doors for staff.

p.3

Inspection findings

In fact, evidence presented by the school highlighted to the inspection team that improvements in pupils’ behaviour pre-dated the introduction of the new behaviour policy. The proportion of pupils who are excluded for a fixed period has reduced over the previous three years and is now below the national average. Furthermore, leaders have developed suitable systems to reduce the possibility of repeat exclusions. Leaders’ communication with parents of pupils who are excluded is frequent and pupils receive appropriate advice and guidance to help them return to school and catch up on missed work. However, inspection evidence demonstrates that the rates of temporary exclusions for disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities increased in 2017/18.

p.3

Inspection findings

Rates of attendance improved considerably during the academic year 2017/18 for all pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Disadvantaged pupils continue to be absent more often than other pupils nationally, but this difference is steadily diminishing. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent from school has reduced over time and overall figures are now broadly in line with the national average. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons is variable. While in many instances this is due to the size of the school site, it must be noted that some pupils do not always display an eagerness to arrive at their lessons on time.

p.3

Inspection findings

Following a recent review of the school’s curriculum at key stage 3, leaders identified that pupils would benefit from regular and more structured personal development. Accordingly, leaders have introduced ‘aspiring for personal excellence’ lessons to improve the personal, social, health and economic education programme so that pupils’ understanding of British values and resilience are developed further.

p.3

External support

Leaders receive a high standard of support from the trust in all aspects of the school’s provision. The high-quality training provided by the trust has improved leadership considerably. In addition to this, the school has benefited from the support of a school improvement partner from outside the trust. A local leader of education has also conducted a recent review of safeguarding practices.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 continue to develop the pastoral curriculum to strengthen pupils’ personal development and understanding of British values  improve pupils’ punctuality to lessons.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the chief executive officer of the trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for East Riding of Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion