Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Pebble Brook School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
18 Sept 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Lucy English
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HP21 8LZ
- Name on report verified
Pebble Brook School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You have carefully reviewed the current strengths of the school and identified clear areas for further development, including ensuring that teaching and learning is consistently strong across the school. p.1
- Staff ensure that pupils have the personal, social and academic skills to have happy and successful futures. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 979
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr David Miller Headteacher Pebble Brook School Churchill Avenue Aylesbury Buckinghamshire HP21 8LZ
p.1
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
Following my visit to the school on 18 September 2018 with Simon Yates, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
You and your leadership team have maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You have ensured that pupils are central to all decisions about the school. All staff are committed to the school’s motto of ‘success for everyone’ and work tirelessly to build pupils’ self-esteem and self-confidence. Staff ensure that pupils have the personal, social and academic skills to have happy and successful futures.
p.1
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
Pupils feel valued at Pebble Brook. They appreciate the level of care from all staff and feel that they are making good progress. Pupils told us that they like the lessons and the many opportunities outside the classroom, especially the vocational and employment learning, which includes structured work experience. Pupils are proud to be part of the school. They say that they are listened to and that their ideas are acted on. They also told us that the calm and respectful behaviour we observed is typical of behaviour across the school.
p.1
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
Parents are overwhelmingly positive about their children’s progress and development. Often, pupils have had difficult experience of school and education prior to joining Pebble Brook. Parents described the transformation in their lives following admission to the school. One parent commented: ‘My child is happy, has made friends and learns; three things that I wasn’t sure would ever be possible before starting Pebble Brook.’
p.1
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
You have addressed and successfully achieved the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. You have carefully reviewed the current strengths of the school and identified clear areas for further development, including ensuring that teaching and learning is consistently strong across the school. Governors recognise the need to increase their level of challenge to senior leaders, including when evaluating the use of additional funding.
p.1
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
A strong culture of safeguarding runs throughout the school. Staff are acutely aware of the additional vulnerability of pupils. You have established strong and systematic processes through which staff can record the slightest worry. Staff are trained well and know what to look out for. The case studies that we examined showed that all concerns are taken seriously and that there are regular reviews to establish if further action is needed. If required, action is taken swiftly and with determination. Staff have established strong working links with external agencies and use their expertise well. Staff also work well with parents to help them understand how to keep their children safe.
p.2
Short inspection of Pebble Brook School
The school’s recruitment processes are undertaken systematically and checks regarding adults’ suitability to work with pupils are recorded appropriately. Pupils feel safe and benefit from a well-considered personal and social development (PSD) curriculum. This covers potential risks and teaches pupils to recognise and develop a range of strategies to deal with them. Attendance is in line with the national average for special schools.
p.2
Inspection findings
During this inspection we considered how well governors fulfil their statutory duties and hold leaders to account. We found that governors are dedicated to the school and determined that it should provide the best for its pupils. Governors are, rightly, proud of the journey the school has been on and what it now provides for pupils and their families. They have undertaken a range of training, including that relating to safeguarding. Governors recognise that they now need to increase the level of challenge to leaders. They also need to ensure that they are strategic in addressing each aspect of the school’s work. We also considered the difference that the pupil premium funding makes to pupils. Leaders use this money to provide extra learning and intervention and to develop pupils’ social and personal learning, for example through extra-curricular experiences. Leaders explained how this spending has benefited pupils and the
p.2
Inspection findings
school’s own assessments indicate that disadvantaged pupils make similar progress to their peers. However, leaders have not been systematic in their evaluation of the impact of their spending decisions. We looked at the curriculum and how effectively it prepares pupils for their next steps. Leaders have carefully planned a curriculum that successfully marries academic learning with personal, social and emotional development. It is broad and balanced and supports pupils to make strong progress. The curriculum includes many personalised opportunities, especially in work-related learning, which help pupils to secure positive destinations. Increasingly, pupils are also successfully gaining nationally recognised qualifications. Leaders aim to provide a personalised learning experience for each pupil based on their individual needs. The overall curriculum experience certainly provides this, particularly in the 16 to 19 provision. Here, leaders work tirelessly to secure
p.2
Inspection findings
individual work placements that can often lead to permanent employment. Annual review documentation indicates that staff know pupils well and adapt individuals’ timetables to meet their specific needs. However, this drive for personalisation is not consistent throughout the school. In some lessons, pupils often complete the same tasks without reference to their personal targets or their prior achievements. Leaders acknowledge the need to continue their development of teaching so that all becomes as strong as the best.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that: governors increase their strategic challenge to leaders leaders use a systematic approach to demonstrate the impact of additional funding on pupils’ progress teaching and learning continue to develop so that all is as strong as the best.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Buckinghamshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
Meetings were held with you, other members of the school leadership team and members of staff. I met with members of the governing body, including the chair of the governing body. I also had telephone conversations with the head of special education needs from the local authority and three external providers. We met with you to review the school’s self-evaluation and development plans, and to jointly plan the key lines of enquiry for this inspection. We visited 16 classes across the school to observe pupils’ learning, speak with them and look at their work. Most of these visits were conducted jointly with school leaders.
p.3
Information about the inspection
We spoke with pupils at breaktime and met with a group formally to look at their work with them. Fifty-five responses to Ofsted’s online pupil survey were considered. Meetings with parents and carers at the end of the school day and 24 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 16 free-text comments, were considered. We spoke with staff during the day and took account of 38 responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire. We looked at a range of documentation, including information about the work of governors, safeguarding, attendance and behaviour, annual reviews and curriculum and lesson planning.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion