Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Water Leys Primary School
Summary
Christine Watkins (lead), Caroline Poole, Rob Gooding
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Sept 2018
- Inspectors verified
Caroline Poole, Christine Watkins, Rob Gooding
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LE18 1HG
- Name on report verified
Water Leys Primary School
- URN verified
120079
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result of strong leadership and effective teaching, attainment and progress in mathematics improved considerably. p.5
- The leader is knowledgeable and has high expectations for children’s learning. p.7
- Leaders have high expectations for staff and pupils. p.1
- Teachers have high expectations for pupils’ conduct in lessons. p.4
- For example, one commented that the school has ‘a lovely, inclusive atmosphere’ and another said, ‘I am very confident in the school.’ Parents of pupils new to the school and those whose children have SEN and/or disabilities were particularly positive in their comments. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of leadership and management by making sure that: – leaders use the outcomes of their monitoring to address and eliminate the remaining pockets of weaker teaching – the recent improvements in progress and attainment at the end of key stage 2 are sustained. p.2
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that teachers give clear instructions and use questioning precisely, so that pupils are clear about what is expected of them and apply themselves with confidence. p.2
- Raise attainment in reading to be at least in line with the national average at the end of key stage 2. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,511
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Water Leys Primary School Guilford Drive, Wigston, Leicestershire LE18 1HG
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have high expectations for staff and pupils. They have successfully addressed the areas for improvement from the last inspection. Governors have an accurate overview of the school’s performance. They are effective in holding leaders to account. Parents and carers are overwhelmingly positive about the quality of education the school provides. The vast majority who responded to the online survey said that they would recommend the school to others. Safeguarding is effective. Leaders, staff and governors are united and proactive in their approach to keeping pupils safe. The quality of teaching has improved significantly. This has resulted in improved outcomes for pupils, especially in mathematics. Teachers encourage pupils to learn from their mistakes. As a result, pupils are becoming increasingly resilient and confident learners. Pupils’ behaviour is good. Their conduct around school is consistently calm and courteous.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils who spoke with inspectors confirmed that they feel safe from all forms of bullying. They have confidence in staff to handle any issues that may arise. Attainment in key stage 1 is typically in line with that seen nationally. Progress and attainment at the end of key stage 2 improved significantly in 2018. Leadership and teaching in the early years are good. Children make a smooth start to their learning and are well prepared for the demands of Year 1. Leaders have not used outcomes of their monitoring checks to successfully eliminate some small pockets of weaker teaching. Occasionally, when teachers do not give clear instructions or when their questioning is not precise, pupils lose focus in lessons and their learning slows. The teaching of reading is an area of focus for the school. Attainment in reading is lower than in writing and mathematics, in most year groups.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of leadership and management by making sure that: – leaders use the outcomes of their monitoring to address and eliminate the remaining pockets of weaker teaching – the recent improvements in progress and attainment at the end of key stage 2 are sustained. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that teachers give clear instructions and use questioning precisely, so that pupils are clear about what is expected of them and apply themselves with confidence. Raise attainment in reading to be at least in line with the national average at the end of key stage 2.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Leaders and governors have an ambitious vision for the school. By means of some astute appointments, the headteacher and governors have strengthened the leadership team since the last inspection. There is good capacity for this renewed team to ensure continued improvement. Leaders have high expectations for staff and pupils. They have put in place a thorough system for checking the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Consequently, leaders have an accurate and up-to date overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the school’s performance. The quality of teaching has improved significantly since the last inspection, in most year groups. Middle leadership is strong. Those middle leaders who spoke with inspectors gave clear examples of the impact of their work on teaching and standards. Staff morale is high, and staff say that they are proud to work at the school and value the range of training
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
opportunities available to them. The leadership of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is effective. The special educational needs coordinator makes sure that pupils’ progress from their starting points is carefully monitored. Parents gave positive feedback to inspectors regarding the quality of care and teaching their children receive. As a result of this well-coordinated approach, pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities make good progress. Leaders and staff effectively promote pupils’ understanding of the fundamental British values and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. There are regular opportunities to respect and celebrate a wide range of cultural differences. For example, pupils spoke enthusiastically about decorating their classrooms through a ‘Diwali doorstep’ theme and participating in the national ‘Spirited Arts’ competition. In addition, the extensive programme of visits, visitors and assemblies promotes cultural
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
diversity effectively. Pupils demonstrate a well-developed sense of moral purpose; they understand the concepts of right and wrong and consequences. Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain. The school’s broad and balanced curriculum has been devised jointly by leaders and staff in response to the school’s context. For example, themes are planned in order to counteract the historical underperformance of boys. This is having an increasingly positive impact on progress and attainment. Pupils with whom I spoke recalled with enthusiasm memorable learning in a range of subjects, especially in science. For example, they spoke confidently about gravity, the solar system and electricity and could describe the differences between solids, liquids and gases. Leaders have not used the outcomes of their monitoring to successfully eliminate the small pockets of weaker teaching which persist.
p.3
Governance of the school
After the last inspection, the governing body commissioned additional training and a voluntary external review of its performance. This has resulted in significant improvements in governance. Members of the governing body do not shy away from asking pertinent questions. They regularly challenge leaders and hold them to account for the school’s performance. Individual governors make regular visits to school as part of their joint monitoring programme. They meet with senior and middle leaders to discuss their roles, speak with pupils and carry out a range of activities, alongside leaders, to check on the quality of teaching and learning. Governors receive regular and precise information about the plans for spending the additional funding received through the pupil premium and the physical education and sport premium. Regular meetings take place with the deputy headteacher to review the impact of the school’s work to raise standards for disadvantaged pupils. Governors are
p.4
Governance of the school
aware that, currently, disadvantaged pupils are making better progress in reading, writing and mathematics than their peers in school at the end of key stage 2.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. All parents and staff who responded to the online survey and those who spoke with inspectors stated clearly that the school is safe. Pupils could describe several ways in which the staff keep them safe. For example, they appreciate the personal ‘handover’ at the end of the day. During the inspection, a range of teaching and support staff confirmed that they receive regular and thorough safeguarding training. They are knowledgeable about the school’s procedures for raising any welfare or child protection concerns. Leaders keep careful records of concerns and incidents. They employ a school-based education welfare officer, who works effectively with vulnerable children and families. All of the school’s employment checks are in place, in line with statutory requirements.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment has improved since the last inspection. Pupils are keen learners. Because of effective planning and teaching, activities are well matched to pupils’ abilities. This enables them to learn and progress well. Teachers have high expectations for pupils’ conduct in lessons. They encourage pupils to work with a positive attitude and to make the most of their time for learning. The impact of this can be seen in pupils’ quick, calm response to routines and in the smooth flow of learning in lessons. Evidence from their workbooks shows that pupils take pride in their work. Teachers give feedback which is consistently in line with the school’s policy and, often, at the immediate ‘point of learning’. This means that pupils know how to improve their work and typically make good progress throughout the year. Teachers encourage pupils to learn from their mistakes. Consequently, pupils are
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
becoming increasingly resilient and confident learners. Teaching assistants provide effective support for pupils. They work skilfully alongside teachers to offer both support and challenge where needed. The teaching of mathematics was an area of focus for the school in 2017. As a result of strong leadership and effective teaching, attainment and progress in mathematics improved considerably. In lessons, pupils were observed to relish the challenge of mathematical problems where they are required to explain their reasoning. They spoke enthusiastically about their learning and said that their teachers explain things well. The teaching of phonics is effective. Younger pupils use their knowledge of letter sounds to help them make faster progress in reading and writing. The teaching of grammar, punctuation and spelling has improved. Pupils successfully apply the knowledge and skills they learn in grammar lessons to their written work
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
across a range of subjects. The teaching of reading is an area of focus for the school. In most year groups, attainment in reading, including pupils’ ability to infer meaning from texts, is weaker than in writing and mathematics. Occasionally, when teachers do not give clear instructions or when questioning is not precise, pupils lose focus and their learning slows.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The pupils’ good attitudes to learning are having an increasingly positive impact on their progress, which is improving. The work in their books is well presented, denoting pride in their achievements. Pupils are proud of their school. Those who spoke with inspectors described their learning as ‘fun’ and the teachers as ‘kind but strict – in a good way’. In their responses to the online survey, parents expressed many positive views about the school. For example, one commented that the school has ‘a lovely, inclusive atmosphere’ and another said, ‘I am very confident in the school.’ Parents of pupils new to the school and those whose children have SEN and/or disabilities were particularly positive in their comments. Pupils say that they receive regular teaching about how to stay safe, including e-safety. They are clear about the meaning of bullying, although they say that it is not an issue
p.5
Personal development and welfare
at the school. Pupils were keen to share how the school’s anti-bullying policy was developed in consultation with the school council and presented by them to the whole school during a series of assemblies. Occasionally, when explanations in lessons are not clear, some pupils lose focus and disengage from their learning.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Their conduct in lessons and around school was observed to be consistently calm and orderly throughout the inspection. The vast majority of pupils show courtesy and respect towards others. They typically cooperate well with each other in lessons, following routines without fuss. Most parents and staff who spoke with inspectors and who completed the online surveys described pupils’ behaviour at the school as good. The school environment is well resourced. The outside areas have been carefully laid out with a wide range of equipment and ‘zones’ which encourage physical fitness, positive play and social interaction. Pupils were observed to use these spaces well at breaktimes and lunchtimes, and those who spoke with inspectors commented that they ‘rarely’ see incidents of troublesome behaviour. Pupils’ attendance is typically in line with the national average and persistent absence
p.6
Behaviour
is low. The school’s education welfare officer works effectively with the small proportion of disadvantaged pupils whose attendance is below that of their peers.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
Standards of attainment in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 1 have been consistently at least in line with the national average, over time. The provisional key stage 1 results for 2018 show that these standards have been sustained and strengthened, especially in mathematics. In the past, pupils left the school at the end of Year 5. In 2017, the school’s first set of key stage 2 results were disappointing. Attainment and progress in reading and mathematics were below, or well below, the national averages. The provisional key stage 2 results for 2018 show improvement. Rates of progress in reading, writing and mathematics have improved. Attainment in mathematics at the expected and at the high standard improved significantly. Disadvantaged pupils made especially good progress compared to the previous year. The current improvements in outcomes were confirmed during the inspection by
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
checking work in pupils’ books, speaking with staff and pupils and observing learning in lessons across the whole school. The combined results for attainment at the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 2 have remained static, below the national average, for two years. This is because standards in reading did not improve in 2018 and this has affected the combined score. Because of effective leadership and teaching, the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check has been steadily improving for at least three years. Provisional figures for 2018 show that the school’s phonics result is now above typical national figures. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities make good progress from their starting points.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Leadership and teaching in the early years are good. The leader is knowledgeable and has high expectations for children’s learning. Staff assess the children’s starting points thoroughly. They use the outcomes of their assessments to adapt the teaching and curriculum precisely, in order to cater for children’s needs and stages of development. Staff plan an appropriate range of activities which flow seamlessly across the two classrooms and the shared outdoor provision. They monitor carefully the way in which children access each activity, making sure that they have equal access to a wide range of learning opportunities. Staff record the children’s progress daily. At the time of the inspection, the children had only been in school for two weeks. However, their response to routines and expectations was already positive, and the atmosphere across the whole provision was happy and purposeful throughout the
p.7
Early years provision Good
inspection. In the past, boys had lagged well behind girls in their progress and attainment. Early indications are that boys are currently achieving as well as girls. For example, boys were observed to choose simple activities to improve their early writing skills equally as often as girls. The boys showed good levels of concentration and persistence in their daily ‘peg challenge’ to write independently and legibly, with good results. A group of boys was observed to interact with good communication and cooperation in the ‘home corner’, which they had transformed into a ‘sandwich bar’. Using good language skills, they negotiated roles and acted out scenarios with confidence and enjoyment. A number of ‘boy-friendly’ themes have been incorporated into the curriculum this year, to improve boys’ involvement and interest. It is too soon to see the impact of this approach on outcomes. The teaching and support staff work seamlessly together as an effective team across
p.7
Early years provision Good
both classes, and in the outdoor area. Staff are clear about their roles and support children effectively in their learning and development. Safeguarding in the early years is effective, as in the rest of the school. Training is up to date and staff are knowledgeable about the procedures for raising concerns. Leaders and staff are proactive in involving parents in their children’s early education. For example, staff undertake home visits and provide ‘stay and play’ sessions and occasional workshops to inform parents about approaches to activities such as phonics and mathematics.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Website www.waterleysprimaryschool.co.uk
p.8
School details
Email address office@waterleys.leics.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 12–13 July 2016
p.8
Information about this school
Water Leys Primary School is larger than the average primary school. The school works in collaboration with a group of local schools known as the Oadby Learning Partnership. In the past, pupils left the school at the end of Year 5. The school had its first cohort of Year 6 pupils during the 2016/17 academic year. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is broadly in line with the national average. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is in line with the national average.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning in 26 lessons or part lessons, some jointly with senior leaders. Inspectors looked at work across an extensive range of pupils’ books and considered the school’s assessment information on the progress and standards achieved by current pupils. Inspectors visited the school library, listened to pupils read and talked with them about their reading. Inspectors met with the headteacher, other senior leaders and leaders with responsibility for English, mathematics, early years and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Inspectors met with those responsible for attendance, behaviour, bullying and exclusions, disadvantaged pupils and the sport premium. They also met with other teachers and support staff. The lead inspector met with members of the governing body and held a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority. Inspectors met with parents at the start of the school day and during the parent
p.9
Information about this inspection
workshops after school on day one of the inspection. The lead inspector considered the 43 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and the 17 responses to the online staff survey. Inspectors considered a wide range of documentation, including the school’s improvement plan and self-evaluation summary, minutes of meetings of the governing body, the school’s current information on pupils’ attainment and progress, attendance records, behaviour and exclusion logs, external reports on the work of the school, monitoring and evaluation records and a range of documents relating to safeguarding.
p.9
Inspection team
Christine Watkins, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Caroline Poole Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion