Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 16 Jul 2018 · published 1 Oct 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Belita Scott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    16 Jul 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Belita Scott

  • Postcode verified

    TS24 7LE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovingimprovedskilledconsistentlysafeclearlyclear
Criticismpoortoo oftenpersistently absentbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,291
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

David Akers Ward Jackson Primary School Clark Street Hartlepool County Durham TS24 7LE

p.1

Jackson Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 16 July 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Jackson Primary School

This monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. It was undertaken in light of the further priorities for improvement identified at the first monitoring inspection, which took place on 10 November 2017.

p.1

Jackson Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held discussions with the headteacher, other senior leaders, subject leaders, pupils, parents, the governing body, an officer of the local authority and a diocesan representative to discuss the actions taken since the last monitoring inspection. I reviewed the minutes of governing body and officers’ group meetings which have taken place since the previous monitoring inspection. The school development plan was evaluated. We observed teaching, learning and assessment in all year groups, from Nursery to Year 5. The vast majority of Year 6 pupils had moved on to their secondary schools at the time of this monitoring inspection. I also checked the school’s procedures for the safe recruitment of staff. You provided the most recent assessment information for children in the early years, and pupils in Years 2 and 6, together with details of pupils’ attendance and those who are persistent absentees.

p.1

Context

One governor has resigned and four new governors have been appointed since the first monitoring inspection. A new subject leader for mathematics took up post at the beginning of the spring term and teaches in the Year 4/5 class. A new Year 3/4 teacher was appointed on a short-term contract, until the end of the academic year. One teaching assistant resigned at the end of January. The school continues to have a very mobile population of pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last monitoring inspection, governors have undertaken an audit of their skills and identified some omissions. New governors with a range of pertinent skills have been recruited. They have attended a comprehensive induction programme. Governors are beginning to challenge senior and subject leaders more robustly. Meetings of the full governing body and governors’ committee meetings are now clerked appropriately. An external review of governance was carried out between March and April in 2017. The reviewers undertook a follow-up visit in January 2018 and noted the ‘substantial progress’ made to improve governance. Overall, the effectiveness of governance is improving.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have developed a concise, informative and useful school development plan. School improvement actions are identified clearly, as are the measures by which governors can evaluate their success. There is clear separation between who will carry out school improvement actions, who will check that they have been undertaken and who will evaluate their success. As a result, leaders at all levels are fully aware of their duties and responsibilities.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have concentrated their efforts on improving the standards that pupils reach, and the progress that pupils make, in reading, writing and mathematics since the beginning of the academic year. They acknowledge that provision for the wider curriculum requires development in the 2018/19 academic year.

p.2

Main findings

The Year 6 pupils have had extra reading, writing and mathematics lessons throughout the year. The unvalidated results from the key stage 2 assessments undertaken by Year 6 in 2018 show a substantial increase in the proportion of pupils who reached the expected standards in all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

The standards attained by pupils at the end of key stage 1 have also improved in reading, writing and mathematics. However, standards in reading and writing remain below the 2017 national averages. Notably, the school’s assessment information indicates that a small number of pupils achieved greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics in 2018. No pupils achieved this in 2017.

p.2

Main findings

Similarly, at the end of the early years, the school’s assessment information shows that more children have exceeded the early learning goals in literacy and mathematics this year than in 2017.

p.2

Main findings

The subject leader credits pupils’ better progress in reading to the introduction and implementation of a new reading scheme in key stage 2. Pupils told the inspector that teaching in reading is better than teaching in writing and mathematics. They like being encouraged to read more books. The educational visit to the national centre for children’s books, Seven Stories, was particularly well received by pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Governors identified correctly that the standard of pupils’ writing remains a key area for improvement. During this inspection, we noted that many children at the end of the Reception Year, and pupils at the end of Years 1 and 2, do not form, size and place letters properly. These basic skills require immediate development. Teachers’ expectations of pupils’ letter formation and writing habits need to be higher. Currently, some pupils place their head in the palm of one hand or lie it on top of one arm as they write. Teachers do not ensure that pupils adopt a good seating position when they are writing.

p.3

Main findings

The new subject leader for mathematics undertook a scrutiny of pupils’ work prior to taking up her post formally at the beginning of January. Quite correctly, she identified that pupils were too often repeating easy calculations that they had already mastered. Teachers, under the subject leader’s assertive guidance, now include opportunities for pupils to use their reasoning skills in all mathematics lessons. As a result, pupils are becoming more skilled at using and applying their mathematical knowledge to solve problems and carry out investigations.

p.3

Main findings

The coordinator for special educational needs has identified correctly that the provision for some pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities requires rapid development. His incisive monitoring has identified that pupils’ needs are not identified early enough. This is of high priority in the school’s improvement planning.

p.3

Main findings

Teachers and support staff act in accordance with the revised behaviour and anti- bullying policies consistently. The school was an oasis of calm during the inspection. Pupils have noticed that other pupils’ behaviour is improving. Leaders are pleased that there are fewer incidents of poor behaviour disrupting lessons. Leaders know their pupils and families well. They provide effective support to get pupils into school every day. As a result, pupils’ attendance is rising. The number who are persistently absent is reducing.

p.3

External support

An officers’ group, which includes officers from the local authority and the diocese, meets at intervals to challenge and support leaders in relation to all aspects of school development. This group has kept leaders, including governors, firmly focused on school improvement. Leaders acted immediately to comply with the recommendations of a recent diocesan review of the school’s arrangements to safeguard pupils. As a result, the school’s central record of staff recruitment checks is now monitored by the headteacher and governors regularly. It is fully compliant with requirements.

p.3

External support

The local authority has provided effective support for the development of the quality of teaching in English and mathematics. In addition, officers recently checked the accuracy of teachers’ assessments at the end of the Reception Year, in reading, writing and mathematics in Year 2 and in writing in Year 6.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Durham, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hartlepool Borough. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion