Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited

Inspected 17 Aug 2108 · published 19 Sept 2018 · URN 1276437

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bob Cowdrey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Aug 2108

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bob Cowdrey

  • Postcode verified

    MK17 8LX

  • Name on report verified

    Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited

  • URN verified

    1276437

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
15
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
8 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Bob Cowdrey, HMI

p.1

Address:

Cobra House Ortensia Drive Wavendon Milton Keynes MK17 8LX Monitoring visit: Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited, 16–17 August 2018

p.1

Context and focus of visit

This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of a series of monitoring visits to a sample of new apprenticeship training providers that are funded through the apprenticeship levy. Ofsted’s intention to carry out monitoring visits to these new providers was first announced by Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector in November 2017. The focus of these visits is on the three themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited (Securitas) is a large employer with around 11,500 staff. The company provides protective services to a wide range of employers across the UK. It currently has around 650 apprentices, whose funding is through the apprenticeship levy and who are on a standards-based programme in customer service. Apprentices enrol initially as security officers and on successful completion of the apprenticeship can progress to the role of protective services officer. All apprentices are employees of Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not have sufficient resources in place to support the apprenticeships that they offer. Securitas has too few assessors to meet the needs of its apprentices. Those apprentices who should complete their programme in September are making slow progress and are unlikely to succeed. Leaders have not made sure that the programme meets the requirements of an apprenticeship, including an entitlement to adequate on- and off-the-job training. Most apprentices do not receive their full entitlement of off-the-job training. The majority of apprentices and Securitas site managers are unsure about the range of activities that they should record. The majority of apprentices do not have sufficient preparation for their end-point assessment. Leaders have not implemented suitable governance arrangements for the apprenticeship programme. Because of this, leaders do not receive constructive and meaningful challenge and are not accountable for the delivery of high-quality

p.2

Insufficient progress

training. Managers’ failure to ensure that the programme has sufficient assessors means that a small minority of apprentices have not had a progress review for five months. Securitas line managers do not take enough responsibility for progress reviews. Targets for apprentices are not specific enough to help them improve. As a result, most apprentices fall behind with their work and make slow progress towards completing their apprenticeship. Monitoring visit: Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited, 16–17 August 2018 Arrangements for recruitment lack integrity. Leaders, managers and staff do not give enough guidance to apprenticeship applicants. The vast majority of apprentices have done the same job role for a long period of time. Because of a lack of support from assessors, they do not develop new skills or behaviours, or gain new knowledge; nor do they have planned career pathways. Too few apprentices have a good

p.2

Insufficient progress

understanding of their planned completion date, and many are unaware of what they need to do to complete an apprenticeship. Most line managers are unclear about the structure and nature of apprenticeships, particularly about end-point assessment.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders’ self-evaluation of the quality of provision lacks realism and reflective analysis. Quality improvement planning is not sufficiently evaluative. The self- evaluation report focuses on compliance and does not identify areas of weakness well enough. Actions in the quality improvement plan are not specific. As a result, improvements in the quality of provision are too slow. For example, support for apprentices’ development of English and mathematics skills and support to help them prepare for end-point assessments are insufficient. Measures to observe and improve the quality of training are ineffective in raising standards. Managers do not identify and share best practice among training staff. Most apprentices do not have a choice about enrolling for the apprenticeship training programme. As a result of this compulsory training, apprentices do not enjoy their learning or understand its nature. Too many apprentices are unaware of their

p.3

Insufficient progress

entitlement and do not receive sufficient time allocated to off-the-job-training. As a result of this, the vast majority are behind schedule with their apprenticeship programme and lack motivation. Apprentices make slow progress, and few are on target to achieve within the planned timescale. Twenty-one apprentices are due to complete in September 2018 and it is unlikely that any will achieve on time. Apprentices’ achievements of English and mathematics qualifications during the past year have been very low. The large majority of apprentices receive insufficient support from their line managers when they complete their written work. A minority of apprentices receive effective support and benefit from constructive and helpful feedback so that they know exactly how to improve and how to complete their units of study. Typically, however, assessors do not correct punctuation, spelling and grammatical errors in

p.3

Insufficient progress

apprentices’ work. Because of this, apprentices continue to repeat their mistakes. A few apprentices cannot access their e-portfolio to upload information. The planning and delivery of training to develop apprentices’ English and mathematical skills are poor. Apprentices who should complete functional skills qualifications in English and mathematics as part of their programme do not receive enough support or tuition. Leaders and managers do not emphasise the importance of developing good English and mathematics skills linked to apprentices’ work and Monitoring visit: Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited, 16–17 August 2018 rely too much on providing apprentices with online support. Assessors do not pay sufficient attention to the development of the skills and knowledge of apprentices who already have English and mathematics qualifications. Too few apprentices receive reviews on a timely basis as stipulated under

p.3

Insufficient progress

apprenticeship requirements. Employers and line managers have insufficient involvement in reviews of apprentices’ progress. Consequently, they do not support apprentices to develop new skills and knowledge at work. Assessors do not set and record useful and detailed training and development targets for their apprentices to help them make progress. Assessors do not focus sufficiently on the development of apprentices’ knowledge, skills and behaviours. Apprentices do not demonstrate a good understanding of equality and diversity in the workplace. They do not appreciate how British values apply to them or how they might reflect and demonstrate these in their jobs. Assessors do not develop or expand apprentices’ knowledge in these areas during reviews. For example, apprentices consider that equality means that they should ‘treat everyone in the same way’.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and senior managers ensure that safeguarding arrangements are effective, and apprentices stay safe. They make appropriate employment checks on new staff and keep the related records. They have developed good links with local agencies, such as the police. All Securitas training staff are ‘Project Griffin’ trainers and deliver in-house training on safeguarding. The designated safeguarding officer (DSO) and deputy DSO receive good training. The DSO has implemented sound systems and processes to record and monitor any concerns. Apprentices receive good information about safeguarding. Managers provide useful information about safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ duty policies in the apprentice handbook. The vast majority of apprentices know whom to contact with any safeguarding concerns. The handbook does not contain clear information about the availability of the DSO or deputy DSO. Apprentices know how to keep themselves safe in the workplace and when they

p.4

Reasonable progress

work in hazardous environments. Employers’ staff in the workplace provide appropriate training and ensure that apprentices use personal protective equipment effectively. Securitas leaders have a ‘Prevent’ duty risk assessment and action plan and are clear about potential threats that are specific to their business and workplaces. Apprentices have a basic awareness of British values and the risks of radicalisation and extremism, but their knowledge focuses only on specific religious groups. Trainers and assessors do not explore these topics sufficiently well in relation to the workplace, the implications for different geographical areas and businesses and life in Great Britain. Monitoring visit: Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited, 16–17 August 2018 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to

p.4

Reasonable progress

send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion