Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Fender Primary School
Summary
Elaine White (lead), Eithne Proffitt
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Jul 2018
- Inspectors verified
Eithne Proffitt, Elaine White
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
CH49 8HB
- Name on report verified
Fender Primary School
- URN verified
105039
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders and governors have not ensured that pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, make consistently good progress across the school. p.1
- They are well supported by skilled staff who know their needs and abilities and provide learning that closely matches these. p.1
- Leaders work effectively to promote the school’s values and to develop pupils’ confidence and positive attitudes to learning. p.1
- The school works very well to support the most vulnerable pupils and their families and understand their needs. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching, pupils’ progress and their attainment, including for disadvantaged pupils and children in early years, by ensuring that: – learning more consistently provides the right level of challenge for all pupils – staff have consistently high expectations for pupils’ progress and achievement – activities are more closely matched to pupils’ skills and abilities. p.2
- Leaders and governors, over time, have not secured teaching that meets the needs of all pupils well enough to promote consistently strong progress. p.3
- Although pupils’ progress and standards are now rising, leaders’ plans for improvement have not had a strong enough impact on standards at the end of key stage 1 and key stage 2, or on ensuring that enough pupils attend school regularly. p.3
- Leaders’ initiatives to increase progress and standards in reading are beginning to bear fruit. p.3
- Work to develop pupils’ understanding of books and their speaking skills is improving provision. p.3
- Progress and standards for current pupils, particularly in key stage 2, are improving. p.3
- Leaders have clear systems in place to monitor the quality of teaching. p.3
- This has led to improvements in, for example, the teaching of writing. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,495
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Fender Primary School New Hey Road, Woodchurch, Wirral, Merseyside CH49 8HB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders and governors have not ensured that pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, make consistently good progress across the school. Teachers’ expectations for pupils’ progress are, at times, not high enough. Sometimes activities do not closely meet pupils’ needs. As a result, some pupils, including the most able, do not make the progress of which they are capable. The standards that pupils reach at the end of key stage 1 and key stage 2 remain below national averages. Leaders and governors are aware of the challenges that the school faces. However, at times, this focus limits their ambition for further improvement. Children in the early years do not make consistently good progress from their typically low starting points. Assessment information is not used well enough to plan activities that build on what children already know and can do. Pupils’ attendance is below average and has been so for the last three years. Persistent
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
absence, although improving, is above national averages. Leaders’ systems for sharing information about the identification and monitoring of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities do not ensure that all leaders have the most accurate picture of provision.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders’ initiatives to improve progress and standards in reading, writing and mathematics are beginning to have a positive impact. As a result, standards are rising. Pupils attending the school’s resourced base make good progress. They are well supported by skilled staff who know their needs and abilities and provide learning that closely matches these. Leaders ensure that pupils have opportunities to learn in a range of subjects. Pupils’ personal development is effectively promoted through the curriculum. Leaders work effectively to promote the school’s values and to develop pupils’ confidence and positive attitudes to learning.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, pupils’ progress and their attainment, including for disadvantaged pupils and children in early years, by ensuring that: – learning more consistently provides the right level of challenge for all pupils – staff have consistently high expectations for pupils’ progress and achievement – activities are more closely matched to pupils’ skills and abilities. Improve leadership and management by: – refining plans to improve teaching so that attainment continues to rise – ensuring that all leaders have high expectations of pupils’ outcomes – raising pupils’ attendance and further reducing the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent – ensuring that procedures to identify and monitor the progress of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are strengthened to give all leaders a more accurate picture of provision.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders and governors, over time, have not secured teaching that meets the needs of all pupils well enough to promote consistently strong progress. Although pupils’ progress and standards are now rising, leaders’ plans for improvement have not had a strong enough impact on standards at the end of key stage 1 and key stage 2, or on ensuring that enough pupils attend school regularly. Leaders’ initiatives to increase progress and standards in reading are beginning to bear fruit. Work to develop pupils’ understanding of books and their speaking skills is improving provision. Progress and standards for current pupils, particularly in key stage 2, are improving. Leaders have clear systems in place to monitor the quality of teaching. This has led to improvements in, for example, the teaching of writing. However, measures to raise expectations and challenge across subjects, and to develop problem-solving skills in
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
mathematics, have not made enough difference. As a result, the quality of teaching is inconsistent across the school. Leaders carefully track pupils’ progress and identify those pupils who are falling behind. This monitoring is increasingly effective. This is helping teachers to see their own effectiveness and to improve where they need to. The school’s system of performance management holds staff to account for the achievement of pupils in their class. Middle leadership has developed since the last inspection, with some leaders attending training to improve their skills. The leaders of English and mathematics have led initiatives to improve teaching and progress in their subjects. Although some improvements are evident, these measures have not had a strong impact on raising progress and standards. Pupil premium funding is spent largely on additional staffing to ensure that pupils are taught in smaller classes or groups. Disadvantaged pupils make similar progress to
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
other pupils in the school. This means that differences between the progress of this group and others nationally, although improving, are not diminishing quickly enough. The special educational needs coordinator ensures that the progress of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is tracked and monitored, and that suitable support is put in place to promote learning. As a result, pupils in the school’s resourced provision make good progress in their learning. Other pupils in the school who have SEN and/or disabilities make progress which varies but is often better than for other pupils in the school. Leaders’ systems for the identification and tracking of progress of mainstream pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities do not always ensure that leaders have the most accurate picture of provision. The curriculum is broad, balanced and interesting for pupils. Pupils’ learning includes a range of subjects and the school’s ‘linking our thinking’ approach to cross-curricular
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
learning ensures that pupils learn to apply their skills in other subjects. Pupils’ learning is enriched by visits in the locality to, for example, Birkenhead Park. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well through assemblies, planned discussions and activities to share the school’s values. A regular focus on values such as respect, faith and acceptance helps to develop pupils’ awareness of the importance of tolerance. Pupils show respect for others and an acceptance of difference.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors are very supportive of the school. They are well informed about the strengths and weaknesses of provision, including pupils’ progress and standards. They visit the school regularly to observe provision for themselves. Governors often ask searching questions about the information that they are given. Although they are keen for the school to improve, a focus on the challenges faced by the school limits their expectations. Governors are aware of how funding is spent. They keep a close eye on finances to ensure that the budget is appropriately allocated.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Pupils’ safety is a key focus for all staff. Staff training is up to date and includes, for example, training in the ‘Prevent’ duty. All staff are familiar with the procedures to follow should they have concerns about a pupil. Leaders and staff take appropriate action where they have concerns about a pupil. They liaise with outside agencies and work well to support families in need. Leaders focus well on ensuring that pupils develop a good awareness of how to keep safe. This includes learning about risks from taking ‘selfies’, sexting, and risks in the local area such as gaming and addiction.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teaching is not consistently good. Over time, teaching leads to good progress for those pupils who attend the school’s resourced base. For other pupils, teachers do not consistently use assessment information well to embed challenge in their lessons. At times, teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve from their respective starting points. The teaching of reading is improving. This is encouraging more pupils in key stage 2 to enjoy reading and to read more widely. Younger pupils’ understanding of their reading is also improving. However, at times reading books for younger pupils do not provide sufficient challenge to develop their skills. Staff confidence in the teaching of writing is improving. However, at times, expectations are too low, and activities are not well matched to pupils’ abilities. For example, key stage 1 pupils spend too much time completing activities and repeating
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
skills that they have already mastered. Teaching has focused on improving pupils’ problem-solving skills in mathematics. There is evidence that this is beginning to improve pupils’ understanding and progress, but this is not embedded throughout the school. Teaching assistants are deployed well to support pupils’ learning, including those who have SEN and/or disabilities. This makes a positive contribution to pupils’ progress. Teaching in the resourced provision is very carefully tailored to support pupils’ learning. Staff are skilled in adapting their teaching to meet the varied needs of individuals. As a result, these pupils make good progress in their learning. Staff establish positive relationships with pupils. They successfully encourage pupils to have positive attitudes to their learning and to work hard.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The school works very well to support the most vulnerable pupils and their families and understand their needs. Staff are caring and always mindful of the need to promote pupils’ well-being. A dedicated home-school link worker provides support to pupils and their families who may need additional help. The emphasis leaders and staff place on encouraging pupils’ self-esteem and respect for each other has paid dividends. Pupils are welcoming and accepting of others. They grow in confidence during their time at Fender Primary and this contributes to their positive attitudes to learning. Most pupils say that they enjoy school. They show a pride in their school and this is reflected in the good standard of presentation in their books. Pupils show a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe. They know how to keep safe when online and show an awareness of dangers in the local area. Pupils who
p.5
Personal development and welfare
spoke with inspectors said that they feel safe in school and know that there is an adult they could talk to if they had any concerns. Pupils know about the different types of bullying. They say that bullying is rare in school, but that if it happens staff will sort it out.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Pupils generally behave well both in lessons or around the school. Where learning is not fully meeting their needs, pupils can become restless and distracted and lose focus. Not enough pupils attend school regularly. Attendance has remained below national averages for the last three years. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent from school is above national averages. The school works hard to address this issue. The work of leaders and the home-school link worker to improve attendance is wide-ranging. It is beginning to show impact in reducing the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent from school.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Throughout the school, the rate of pupils’ progress is variable. Progress overall is not good enough and reflects inconsistencies in teaching over time. Standards at the end of key stage 1 and key stage 2 have been below national averages since 2016. Progress at the end of key stage 2 has varied but in 2017 was weak in reading and writing, and below average in mathematics. Current pupils are making variable progress. Overall, progress is improving, particularly in reading. The improvements to the teaching of reading, writing and mathematics are beginning to raise standards in some year groups. The provisional, unvalidated national test data for 2018 indicates that reading and writing standards at the end of Year 6 have improved. Phonics outcomes are not as good as they need to be. The proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in the phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 has, in 2016 and 2017, improved towards the national average. The most recent data
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
for 2018 shows a dip from previous years. Pupils who join the school other than at the usual times are helped to settle well. Their progress, as with other pupils in school, is variable. Disadvantaged pupils make similar progress to other pupils in the school. Progress is improving but is still inconsistent. It is not sufficient to ensure that the differences between disadvantaged pupils’ progress and standards and that of other pupils nationally are diminishing quickly enough. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities attending the school’s resourced provision make good progress in their learning due to skilled, effective teaching. The progress of other pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is more variable due to inconsistencies in teaching over time. The school’s current progress data and analysis of pupils’ work indicate that this group of pupils is making better progress than other pupils in the
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
main school. The most able pupils do not consistently make the progress of which they are capable due to a lack of challenge in their learning. Pupils are well prepared for the transfer to secondary school in terms of their good personal development and positive attitudes to learning. However, the below-average standards that they reach at the end of key stage 2 mean that some pupils are not as well prepared for the next stage of their learning as they could be.
p.6
Early years provision Requires improvement
Children join the Reception class with skill levels that are below those typical for their age. This is particularly the case for children’s communication and language skills. Teaching is not strong enough to ensure that children make enough progress to catch up. As a result, a below-average proportion of children achieve a good level of development at the end of the Reception Year. This means that some children are not well prepared for the transfer to Year 1. Staff provide children with a range of activities that interest them and help to promote their learning. For example, children enjoyed looking at minibeasts and discussing their findings. However, children’s learning is not consistently well promoted through challenge to develop their ideas and thinking. Staff track children’s learning and use this information to plan activities that generally meet needs well. However, at times, expectations for learning are not precisely
p.6
Early years provision Requires improvement
matched to children’s capabilities. For example, some children who struggle to write a simple sentence independently are asked to do this as part of their session to apply their knowledge of letters and sounds. The early years leader has a good knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of provision. Assessments of children’s learning are accurate, but leaders do not consistently ensure that these are used to provide activities that develop learning to the full and ensure good progress. Staff establish positive, warm relationships with children. As a result, children grow in confidence and feel secure in school. This confidence makes a positive contribution to children’s interest in learning and their progress. Staff work well to involve parents in their children’s learning. Parents contribute to their children’s learning journals and are supported to develop opportunities for learning at home. This positive partnership contributes to the progress that children make.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
Staff provide children with a safe, secure environment in which to learn. Adults have a good understanding of how to keep children safe and know how to identify and take action where children may be at risk.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Website http://fender- wirral.frogos.net/app/os#!website/home Email address schooloffice@fender.wirral.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 12–13 November 2013
p.8
Information about this school
This is an average-sized primary school. The large majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils eligible for support through the pupil premium is well above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is well above average. The proportion of pupils who have statements of special educational needs, or education, health and care plans, is above the national average. A higher-than-average proportion of pupils join or leave the school each year. The school is resourced by its local authority to provide a 16-place provision for pupils who have been diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder. The provision is split into two bases which provide long- and short-term placements for pupils who have an education, health and care plan and come from other primary schools across the local authority. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum
p.8
Information about this school
expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of Year 6.
p.9
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed learning throughout the school. Two observations were carried out jointly with the headteacher. In addition, inspectors scrutinised pupils’ workbooks and listened to pupils read. Meetings were held with pupils, the chair of the governing body and four other governors, the headteacher and other senior leaders. The inspectors also met with a representative from the local authority, the school’s independent consultant, and the headteacher of the local high school. Inspectors looked at a range of information produced by the school, including information on pupils’ progress and attainment, behaviour and attendance, procedures for safeguarding and the school’s own evaluation of its work. They considered reports to the governing body, minutes of their meetings and the school’s plans for further improvement. Inspectors considered the 20 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View, and
p.10
Information about this inspection
the views of 10 parents who sent responses via text message to Ofsted. Inspectors also took account of the 27 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire and the 50 responses to the online pupil questionnaire.
p.10
Inspection team
Elaine White, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Eithne Proffitt Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion