Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Pauls CofE VA Primary School

Inspected 27 Jun 2018 · URN 110839

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Liz Cornish (lead), Teresa Skeggs

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Jun 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Liz Cornish, Teresa Skeggs

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CB2 1HJ

  • Name on report verified

    St Pauls CofE VA Primary School

  • URN verified

    110839

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivestrongimprovinggood progresspositiveconfidentmake good progress
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlyslowtoo manyweakerdisruptionnot strongpersistently absent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings652w−51
  • Leadership167w+34
  • Safeguarding210w+45
  • What needs to improve1813w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,760
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

St Pauls CofE VA Primary School Coronation Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1HJ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leadership has been unstable over time. As a result, the overall effectiveness of the school continues to require improvement.  Different groups and abilities of pupils do not make consistently strong progress.  The curriculum is uninspiring. As a result, some pupils have limited interest in their learning and make slow progress.  Assessment information is not used well enough by teachers to plan challenging learning activities, including in early years.  Some pupils do not make good progress in writing, particularly in key stage 1.  Absence rates, especially for disadvantaged pupils, are too high. Too many pupils are persistently absent.  Some parents are concerned about how the school communicates with them. They feel that they do not receive enough information about the progress that their children are making.  The quality of teaching over time is better in some year groups than in others. Where practice is weaker, low-level disruption

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

sometimes occurs.  Leaders do not check children’s starting points when they join the early years class. This makes it difficult for leaders to check how much progress the children are making in the Reception Year. The school has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The school has started to improve rapidly since the two recently appointed interim headteachers took up their posts. Improvements in the quality of teaching, and in outcomes for pupils, are clearly evident.  Leaders from a high-performing federation of schools are being used effectively to bring about improvements in the quality of teaching.  Relationships between pupils are respectful and friendly. As a result, pupils enjoy being part of the school community.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of leadership and management by:  securing effective long-term leadership of the school  developing the curriculum so that it inspires and motivates pupils  ensuring better-quality communication with parents, especially about their children’s progress.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by:  improving teachers’ use of assessment information so that they can plan effectively for all groups of pupils  improving the quality of teaching in relation to writing so that pupils make at least good progress  ensuring that teachers provide sufficient challenge to differing groups and abilities of pupils so that they make at least good progress.  Improve the quality of the early years provision by:  developing accurate and reliable procedures for establishing children’s starting points when they join the Reception year  developing and extending the range of activities provided for children across the

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

early years curriculum.  Improve the quality of pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare by:  raising the attendance rate, especially for disadvantaged pupils  ensuring that pupils develop consistently positive attitudes to learning.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 There have been frequent changes in leadership in recent years. This has meant that the school has not improved consistently since the previous inspection and, at times, improvement has been too slow. Some members of the school community are worried about the unsettling effect of continual change.  A significant number of parents feel that communication with the school is not good enough. Some parents also said that they do not receive the information that they need about their children’s progress. Parents told inspectors: ‘I feel there’s a lack of communication between the class teacher[s] and the parents. I’m not educated in what my child is learning,’ and, ‘I wish to see or hear more about what my child is learning in class.’  The school’s curriculum is not as effective as leaders want it to be, because it does not encourage a love of learning in pupils. The topic themes do not capture pupils’

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

imagination sufficiently or help them to make important links across the different subject areas.  Leaders and governors use the physical education and sport premium funding effectively. However, their evaluation of this is not sharp enough to ensure that they are well placed to make amendments that accelerate pupils’ progress further.  Leaders have wisely commissioned a review of the way in which the school spends pupil premium funding. This is because disadvantaged pupils are not making the progress that they could despite the interventions currently in place.  Leaders have a clear understanding of the individual requirements of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. Additional funding is used appropriately to provide well-judged support and additional staff where required. Several disadvantaged pupils also have complex SEN and/or disabilities. Leaders are now checking the progress of these pupils more closely. School leaders are improving

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

the way that they work with external agencies to make sure that those pupils and their families who are in need of most support receive the best possible help.  The interim headteachers are successfully accelerating the rate of school improvement. Their strong leadership is complemented by good-quality support from a high- performing federation of schools. Parents told inspectors that: ‘The current heads are making a very positive impact. They are dedicated, involved and generally impressive.’  The local authority is providing ongoing support from its implementation group. This support is contributing to the improvements seen in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment and in leadership.  Deputy headteachers from the supporting federation of schools are helping to accelerate improvements in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Leaders have an accurate understanding of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

and provide individualised support for teachers where it is needed. Weaker practice is being swiftly and effectively addressed.  The interim headteachers have planned changes to the staffing structure. They have introduced phase leads who will bring sharper focus and leadership to each phase. Effective leadership skills are not yet well developed across the wider school team. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is being developed thoughtfully as the school improves. Pupils enjoy daily whole-school assemblies which are linked to the rights of the child and provide them with an opportunity for reflection and prayer. The school’s strong focus on ‘perseverance’ is helping pupils to prepare for their lives in modern Britain. Nevertheless, the role of pupils as leaders is not developed enough.

p.3

Governance of the school

 The governing body has not been consistently effective since the previous section 5 inspection. Governors have improved their practice since the most recent Ofsted monitoring visit through honest self-evaluation of their impact. Governors are now providing greater challenge and checking on the work of leaders more effectively.  The governing body is made up of dedicated members who hold a range of professional expertise. The leadership of the governing body changed several times this year. The new chair is in post and is supported well by governors.  Governors have acted to secure strong interim leadership arrangements until a permanent headteacher is appointed. They have also secured the support of a high- performing federation of schools. This is providing stable leadership that is bringing about necessary improvements at a greater rate.  Parent governors see the potential of parental involvement in enriching the curriculum

p.4

Governance of the school

and enabling a range of educational visits through their professional links. They have pledged support to develop the curriculum in this way.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Leaders and governors ensure that keeping pupils safe from harm is given high priority. Leaders rigorously monitor the systems and processes that they have put in place to protect pupils.  Pupils learn how to stay safe from a variety of risks, including those posed by working online or using new technologies. However, some younger pupils do not have an age- appropriate understanding of how to stay safe online.  Pupils say that they feel safe in school. They know who can help them if they experience a problem and are confident that adults will help to resolve any problems.  Leaders have acted to raise staff and pupils’ awareness of safeguarding matters. Leaders ensure that staff receive regular training and updates so that they are aware of the latest safeguarding guidance. Adults have a useful knowledge of the local services available to support pupils.

p.4

Safeguarding

 Leaders also ensure that adults are appropriately updated about individual pupils’ needs and are able to consider these needs when planning learning and support.  Pupil records are well kept and detailed, minimising the risk that important information will be missed. The school works well with a variety of external agencies to help keep pupils safe.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Class teachers do not routinely use assessment information well to plan learning activities that provide appropriate support and challenge for pupils. Learning activities often do not take into account pupils’ specific barriers to learning. This is particularly the case for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities or who are disadvantaged.  Some teachers do not clearly identify the knowledge and skills that pupils need to learn to make good progress. In some classes, too many activities are focused on finishing a task rather than improving knowledge or deepening pupils’ understanding.  Teachers provide too few opportunities for pupils to practise or demonstrate problem- solving and creativity. On occasion, the relevance of the learning tasks is not clear and the tasks do not deepen or extend pupils’ learning. As a result, some pupils find it difficult to see the relevance of what they are learning and practising.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Homework is not used sufficiently well to promote pupils’ learning. A significant proportion of parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, expressed concerns over the quality and amount of homework set.  The impact of additional adults in the classroom on pupils’ learning is mixed. There are examples of effective support for individual pupils, including for some pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. However, leaders and teachers have not ensured that all additional adults are clear about how they should help pupils with their learning.  Current leaders have identified that, in the past, teachers’ assessment has been inaccurate and their views on progress have been overgenerous. Leaders have taken prompt action to ensure that teachers have worked with successful leaders from other schools so that their judgements are now more accurate.  Where teaching over time is most effective, teachers use good subject knowledge and

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

well-constructed questions to challenge pupils to think more deeply about what they are learning. In mathematics, for example, teachers skilfully encourage pupils to use and develop their reasoning skills well. This helps pupils to consolidate and deepen their understanding.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement.  The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent is too high. Absence rates, especially for those pupils who are disadvantaged, are also too high. There is a marked difference between the attendance rates of pupils entitled to free school meals and other pupils.  Too many pupils do not arrive punctually for school in the morning. As a result, they are missing important learning at the start of the school day.  Pupils are not always positive about aspects of their learning, because lessons are not made interesting enough to make them curious and eager to learn more.  Relationships between pupils are positive. Teachers and other adults help pupils, including those pupils who have difficulties in communicating with others, to interact well in a variety of social situations. Pupils follow routines and cooperate increasingly

p.5

Personal development and welfare

well with adults.  Pupils learn about bullying in its different forms and understand the harm that it can cause. They are confident that, on the rare occasions that it does occur, teachers deal with it quickly.  Parents spoken with state overwhelmingly that their children are safe and happy in school.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  Low-level disruption occurs in those lessons where learning activities are not motivating or inspiring for pupils. Some teachers do not challenge pupils when they chat or are not attentive during the teacher’s explanation, and this has a negative impact on pupils’ learning.  Some staff are not skilled in meeting the needs of a very small number of pupils who are demonstrating very challenging behaviour.  Pupils typically move around school in a calm and purposeful manner. Some pupils told inspectors that they would welcome a quieter place to spend breaktimes.  Pupils are courteous and polite. The respectful interaction between ‘response partners’ in lessons is creating relationships that also support learning.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils do not make consistently strong progress across the wider curriculum or across year groups. Outcomes for disadvantaged pupils are too variable across different year groups.  By the end of their time in the early years, the proportion of children reaching standards typical for their age is slightly below the national average. However, adults do not address children’s slow progress consistently or quickly enough.  Inspection evidence shows that most pupils for whom English is an alternative language make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics across both key stages.  In 2017, the proportion of pupils reaching expected standards by the end of key stage 1 in mathematics was broadly in line with the national average. However, the proportions reaching expected standards in reading and writing were below the national average.  In 2017, the proportion of pupils reaching expected standards in reading, writing,

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

mathematics and science by the end of key stage 2 exceeded the national average. However, some pupils do not make the rapid progress that they could, especially in writing.  In 2017, those pupils who had achieved high standards in key stage 1 exceeded the national averages for reading and mathematics in key stage 2. However, this was not the case with writing. Work in current pupils’ exercise books indicates that the most able pupils could make better progress. The most able pupils do not routinely receive the learning challenge that they require to make equally rapid progress in all areas of the curriculum.  Pupils’ attainment in writing was below average at key stage 1 in 2017, especially for middle-attaining pupils, and writing progress was slow in key stage 2. Improving writing outcomes remains a priority for improvement across the school. Some pupils are not sufficiently challenged to extend and improve written work. However, where

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

pupils have been supported to redraft and develop written work in their books, they are able to achieve higher standards.

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Currently, teachers are not doing enough to ensure that children make the progress of which they are capable. Adults do not swiftly assess what children can and cannot do when they join the Reception year. Therefore, some children do not receive timely help to enable them to make progress at a faster rate.  Some parents are not receiving enough information about their child’s progress, and they find it difficult to use the electronic system put in place to find out more.  The learning environment is not as motivating or inspiring as it could be. Leaders have recognised this and have plans in place to significantly redevelop the accommodation to improve children’s learning opportunities.  Leaders are not ensuring that learning activities offer children sufficient access to the full range of experiences that help them develop their understanding and language development well. As a result, the early years curriculum is not a successful enough

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

vehicle to help children to be creative and develop independence.  Almost all children are self-assured and confident and able to communicate their ideas well. Children collaborate well in the activities set out for them. Nevertheless, some children are not being suitably challenged to make faster progress and to be at a good level of readiness to start Year 1.  Outcomes for early years children in 2017 were above average for mathematics, broadly in line with national figures for writing, but below average for reading. Consequently, leaders are now focused on improving the range and quality of reading books available for children.  Children are well cared for in the early years. Leaders are vigilant about safeguarding, and they have made important improvements to the systems and processes that ensure that children are well protected.  The early years leader has a clear view of what needs to be done to improve provision

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

and standards. Leadership capacity has been strengthened by new appointments. The early years team has been strengthened by recent new appointments and, as a result, the pace of improvement has been accelerated.  Leaders have carefully analysed the specific requirements of disadvantaged children in early years, including some who also have SEN and/or disabilities. Additional funding is used effectively to meet their particular needs.  Weekly development work undertaken by early years leaders with the local authority adviser is providing an effective source of support so that the changes made are improving the quality of provision.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Interim Headteachers Caroline Peet and Judith Osler

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 15 December 2015

p.9

Information about this school

 St Pauls C of E Voluntary Aided School is smaller than the average primary school.  Just over half of the pupils are of White British heritage.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is higher than in most schools nationally.  There is a lower-than-average proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or a disability.  The proportion of pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium is lower than in most schools nationally.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of key stage 2.  The school is receiving support from local authority advisers and from a local federation of schools.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and learning in all classrooms. Some of these observations were carried out with the interim headteachers.  Inspectors observed pupils during less structured parts of the school day, such as at the beginning of the day, at lunchtimes, breaktimes and when they were moving around the school. Pupils’ behaviour was also observed in lessons.  Meetings were held with pupils, staff, governors, school leaders and leaders from the federation supporting the school to improve. Inspectors spoke informally with pupils in the playground and dining hall as well as in more formal group discussions with pupils in all key stages. The school did not access the Ofsted online pupil survey, but leaders did show inspectors the responses to their own survey undertaken during the first day of the inspection.  The lead inspector met two local authority advisers who have been supporting the school.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors listened to pupils read and scrutinised work in pupils’ books from a range of subjects and on display. They looked at a range of documentation, including minutes from governing body meetings, the school’s current assessment information, staff monitoring and the school development plan. Behaviour and attendance records and information relating to safeguarding were also scrutinised.  Inspectors took account of 19 staff questionnaires and 96 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and 94 free-text responses.  The lead inspector visited the Wrap-Around care club at the end of the day and spoke with pupils there.

p.10

Inspection team

Liz Cornish, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Teresa Skeggs Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion