Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected 17 Jul 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Lucas

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    17 Jul 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Lucas

  • Postcode verified

    SG8 5EQ

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovingimprovedenthusiasticstrongsafesupportiveclear
Criticismweaknessesyet toseriousconcernsnot sufficientlyinconsistentdisruptionlacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings404w0
  • Leadership1276w+30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,679
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 75%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Pat Baxter Acting Headteacher Roman Way First School Burns Road Royston Hertfordshire SG8 5EQ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 17 July 2018 with Steve Mellors, Her Majesty’s Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in November 2017. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you, other senior members of staff, subject and key stage leaders, a group of teachers, and four groups of pupils. We held phone discussions with the chair of the governing body, the vice chair of the governing body, and two representatives of the local authority.

p.1

Evidence

We evaluated the school’s improvement plan and scrutinised documents relating to: safeguarding; governance; pupils’ achievement, attendance and behaviour; the curriculum; the school’s self-evaluation; provision for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities; and the school’s pupil premium report and provision for disadvantaged pupils.

p.1

Evidence

Accompanied by school leaders, we visited classes in each key stage to observe pupils learning and evaluate work in their books. We also spoke with pupils at breaktime and lunchtime. We considered the views of parents and carers spoken with at the start of the school day, alongside those of the 57 parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View.

p.1

Context

Since the full inspection which was completed in November 2017, you have continued in your role as acting headteacher. Your acting deputy headteacher and acting assistant headteacher have also continued in their roles. Two teachers have left the school and two have joined. Three governors have joined the governing body. You have also overseen a programme of building work which forms part of the ongoing improvements being made to the school site.

p.2

Context

In April 2018, Ofsted carried out an unannounced monitoring inspection under section 8 of the Education Act 2005, and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. This was because, following on from the full inspection, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements.

p.2

Context

In May 2018, in response to a request from you, Ofsted’s regional director (East of England) judged that the school could appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Supported well by the local authority, you and your team are bringing about necessary improvements at Roman Way First School. Importantly, many pupils, staff and parents are supportive of the changes you are making and the way in which you are making them. Staff welcome your clarity and told us that ‘We know where we are going’ and ‘We are working towards common goals’. Parents voiced their appreciation of leaders’ clear communication and swift responses to any concerns they raise. Pupils told us how ‘learning is fun’ and how behaviour has continued to improve since the previous inspection. We noted the obvious happiness with which pupils went about their learning and play.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Through your systematic checking on the quality of provision, you have an accurate and detailed understanding where the strengths and weaknesses lie. You, the governors and the local authority evaluate the progress you are making against the targets in your well-crafted improvement plan. Some aspects of provision are improving faster than others. For example, you rightly acknowledge that aspects of your work have yet to impact fully on teachers’ practice and pupils’ achievement. While the quality of teaching, learning and assessment over time is improving, it remains too uneven.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have taken appropriate action to ensure that teachers understand what pupils can achieve. This action includes setting individual pupil targets using appropriate national benchmarks. Nevertheless, the effectiveness with which teachers use this information to implement learning activities that are well matched to pupils’ capabilities still varies too greatly. For example, teachers told us that, as result of good-quality training, they are more confident when teaching reading and writing. Teachers explained, ‘We now know how to unlock pupils’ creativity.’ Where teachers use these improved strategies to good effect, pupils make significant gains in their literacy skills. This strong practice is not sufficiently commonplace across each key stage. Similarly, leaders’ and teachers’ confidence in using your new assessment and feedback approach is inconsistent. Consequently, while there have been improvements in pupils’ achievement in key stage 1, these are not as great as they

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

need to be, particularly in boys’ writing.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The leadership of the provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is improving. Pupils’ needs are swiftly and accurately identified. Teachers welcome not only the precise information about these pupils’ needs, but also the ongoing dialogue with leaders about how best to meet them. However, some teachers are not applying the school’s agreed strategies well enough and this is slowing the progress of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. This is especially the case in subjects other than English and mathematics.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have made clear the roles and responsibilities of subject and key stage leaders. These enthusiastic leaders are playing an increasingly effective role in school improvement. They welcome the additional time and support you have provided for them to carry out their leadership duties. Subject leaders are particularly appreciative of the support of local authority advisers. However, in subjects other than English and mathematics, leaders do not check the progress pupils make sufficiently well.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

In Ofsted’s April 2018 monitoring visit, safeguarding was judged to be effective. This continues to be the case. You and the governors rightly continue to monitor and refine the school’s safeguarding procedures and seek external verification of the quality of your work. Leaders check staff members’ knowledge and understanding of school procedures and make sure they are regularly and frequently updated about safeguarding policy and practice. Consequently, adults know pupils well and understand the importance of being vigilant in their duty to keep them safe.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Well-kept records demonstrate that leaders act in a timely and proportionate way when a pupil or their family need additional help and support. The family support worker makes a significant contribution to this work. Pupils told us they feel safe and that adults continue to look out for pupils’ well-being. Most parents agree their children are safe at Roman Way First School.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You prioritised bringing about improvements in how adults manage pupils’ behaviour. In this you have been successful. Staff understand and consistently implement the new behaviour system which is based upon your chosen school principles of ‘Ready. Respectful. Safe.’ Pupils told inspectors how these principles translate into more polite, kind and focused behaviour in the classroom. Teachers welcome the simplicity of this approach together with leaders’ consistent support and application of this positive behaviour system. Learning typically takes place in a harmonious and encouraging atmosphere. Your carefully kept records indicate that incidents that lead to fixed-term exclusion are falling as a result. However, where learning activities are less well matched to pupils’ interests and capabilities, some low-level disruption still occurs.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Your changes have not had a significant impact on improving pupils’ attendance, especially that of disadvantaged pupils and of those who have SEN and/or disabilities. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent remains too high. The changes made to the school’s attendance policy and your better monitoring of pupils’ attendance is not reducing pupil absence quickly enough. This is because the leadership of this aspect of your work still lacks the rigour seen elsewhere.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have reviewed the whole-school personal, social and health education provision and have introduced a consistent approach that links closely to the school’s principles. This is a recent development and you have yet to review its impact.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The leadership of the early years is successfully raising standards. The proportion of children achieving a good level of development increased this year. There have been considerable improvements made to the outdoor learning area. Children make enthusiastic use of leaders’ carefully chosen resources that enable them to develop their key skills of reading and writing, as well those in the other areas of early development. Children’s writing is improving. However, adults do not challenge children well enough to make use of their phonics knowledge to build and develop their early writing skills.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Guided by the local authority, the governing body has accelerated the pace of its response to the external review of governance. The quality of governance is improving. Governors, some of whom are new, are developing a more complete understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Making use of improved skills and knowledge gained in additional training, governors are holding leaders to account with greater confidence and rigour. Governors’ visits to school are more clearly focused on the priorities for improvement and governors have a deeper understanding of what the school does well and what it needs to improve. Hence, governors are playing an increasingly effective role in school improvement.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Your response to the review of pupil premium spending is not as developed as it should be. You are not drawing together the strategies to support disadvantaged pupils sufficiently well. For example, the support which is helping some disadvantaged pupils make considerable advances in their writing skills is not being replicated for others who would benefit from it. You are now correctly developing a more detailed pupil premium action plan and know this work needs to be accelerated. You have embraced the well-judged additional support provided by the local authority. This support has been wide ranging and is making a significant contribution to the improvements in the quality of provision. The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:

p.5

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.5

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.5

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school can appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.5

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion