Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 19 Jul 2018 · published 12 Sept 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Louise Adams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Jul 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Louise Adams

  • Postcode verified

    SO45 6ET

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedsuccessfullypositiverapid progressgood progressimprovingstrengths
Criticismweaknessesweakrequires improvementnot consistentlynot strongnot clearabsencenot swiftly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,169
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Emma Moakes Waterside Primary School Ashford Crescent Hythe Southampton Hampshire SO45 6ET

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 19 July 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 develop skills of middle leaders, so they can all support your drive for rapid improvement  improve the teaching and learning of writing skills across the school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you and the interim deputy headteacher, a group of governors and a representative from the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan and reviewed other documentation to support the school’s journey of improvement, such as monitoring of teaching and minutes of governors’ meetings. With you, I visited classes and evaluated work in pupils’ books. I met with middle leaders, teachers and pupils. I also checked documents related to safeguarding.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection, the previous headteacher retired in July 2017 and you took on the role of acting headteacher, until your permanent appointment in January 2018. The interim deputy headteacher has been at the school since September 2017 and is expected to continue for a further academic year.

p.2

Main findings

You and the interim deputy headteacher have acted with determination and rigour to successfully tackle the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. Your absolute focus on improving teaching and learning has led to much-improved outcomes in a very short space of time.

p.2

Main findings

Your positive and collegiate approach, combined with effective communication and consistent processes, has ensured that staff support your drive for improvement, and recognise that the changes are necessary and positive. Consequently, although the school has been through a challenging time, the staff team has remained stable and all are working well with you to take the school to good.

p.2

Main findings

As a result of improved self-evaluation systems, you now know where the school’s strengths and weaknesses are. You use this information well to identify appropriate and timely training for leaders, teachers and teaching assistants. Across the school, staff are better able to meet pupils’ learning needs. Your work to develop leaders is bringing results. However, some leaders who have taken on responsibilities more recently are not clear enough about what they need to do to improve teaching and learning in their areas of responsibility.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have successfully reviewed their structure, organisation and effectiveness. They now have the necessary skills, and are developing their knowledge, to challenge leaders more effectively. They are clear-thinking about what the school needs in terms of senior leadership. For example, they recognise the current senior leadership arrangements are bringing rapid improvement, so they have organised for this to continue for another year.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are rightly determined that all pupils make up ground lost from previously weak teaching. They have implemented effective systems and processes to check pupils’ progress and attainment in year, and over time. Leaders and teachers review the progress of pupils in each class, identifying those that are not working at the standard typical for their age, and provide useful support to enable them to catch up. As a result, many pupils are making rapid progress and end-of-year outcomes are better than last year. This is particularly the case for Year 6 pupils, where attainment improved greatly.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are becoming more effective. Pupils are clear about what they are learning and why. Pupils say that they enjoy lessons much more than they used to as they are more interesting than before. Teachers now encourage pupils to be independent and develop their own learning. Consequently, pupils use their skills and knowledge to improve their work before seeking feedback and next steps from teachers.

p.3

Main findings

Teaching of mathematics and reading is improving well across the school. There is a systematic approach, which all teachers follow, and leaders in these subjects check that pupils’ books show good progress. However, leaders’ analysis of results and pupils’ work in books has identified that the teaching of writing is not as strong as other subjects.

p.3

Main findings

Teaching of groups has improved in some classes but teaching of the most able continues to be an area for further development. Although a few teachers plan activities which challenge the most able pupils to think more deeply, this is not consistently the case across the school. Teaching of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is better than it was, but a more systematic approach to target-setting and reviewing progress would enable teachers to be clearer about how they can challenge and support these pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders and teachers are working together to improve the curriculum. In each class, teachers plan how they will develop skills and knowledge across the curriculum, linking art, history, writing and geography. The planned whole-school subject-specific days and weeks provide an opportunity for pupils to explore subjects in greater depth. Pupils learn about British values and citizenship, working as members of a community. They know about justice, democracy and tolerance and can explain how these are seen in school. Pupils are cooperative, respectful and supportive of one another. Leaders and teachers rightly acknowledge there is more to do to develop and embed improvements in the curriculum.

p.3

Main findings

Processes to record and check attendance are much more rigorous. Pupils now know that attendance is important and parents understand that absence will be followed up. However, although leaders’ actions are sensible, they have not resulted in resolving issues with attendance. Leaders have not reviewed and amended their actions and governors have not challenged this sufficiently robustly.

p.3

Main findings

The school improvement plan identifies the planned actions to improve the school. Leaders and governors check whether actions are completed and have been effective in driving improvements. However, there are a few examples where sufficient improvements are not being made and leaders do not swiftly amend their planned actions. This is evident in leaders’ work to improve attendance.

p.3

External support

You have made good use of the effective support provided by the local authority. Advisers for subject development, coaching for the development of teaching and leadership, alongside support for you and governors, have all contributed to the rapid journey of improvement the school is making.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion