Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Holy Family Catholic Primary School
Summary
Deborah Mosley (lead), Emma Hollis-Brown
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Jul 2018
- Inspectors verified
Deborah Mosley, Emma Hollis-Brown
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
S80 2SF
- Name on report verified
Holy Family Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
122820
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – all leaders evaluate the impact of their actions and amend plans accordingly to bring about continued and sustained improvements, including in the early years setting – senior leaders support the early years leader to be fully effective in her role. p.2
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – teachers use assessment information to plan activities that meet the needs of different groups of pupils – teaching assistants have the skills necessary to support pupils’ learning, including in the early years – teachers move pupils on to challenging work more quickly, including in the early years setting. p.2
- Improve outcomes by: – embedding strategies to improve reading across the school – monitoring the teaching of phonics more closely and taking action to tackle weaknesses. p.2
- Since her appointment in September 2016, the headteacher has brought about significant improvement to all areas, following the school’s decline since its previous full inspection in November 2012. p.3
- She has communicated a clear vision for school improvement and shared her high expectations of staff and pupils. p.3
- Nevertheless, inconsistencies in the quality of education provided by the school remain. p.3
- Leaders understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. p.3
- They have identified clear priorities, and improvement plans are detailed. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes21
“additional language are effectively supported and make good progress.” p.7
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,883
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Holy Family Catholic Primary School Netherton Road, Worksop, Nottinghamshire S80 2SF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have not taken effective action to address all the areas identified as needing improvement at the last inspection. Leaders do not always evaluate the impact of their actions sharply in order to amend plans for further improvement. Pupils’ outcomes in every key stage have been lower than national averages in recent years. The teaching of phonics requires improvement. Pupils’ outcomes in phonics have declined. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inconsistent. Teachers do not routinely plan activities which meet the needs of different groups of pupils. Teaching assistants do not always support pupils’ progress effectively. Pupils are not always moved on to more challenging work quickly enough. The early years leader has not been supported to be fully effective. Some staff do not have the necessary skills to support children as well as they should.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The headteacher has brought about considerable improvements since her appointment in September 2016. Pupils behave extremely well. They are polite, confident and caring. Pupils are safe and happy. The curriculum is broad and balanced. It provides enriching experiences for pupils of all ages. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well. Some middle leaders have become more effective since the last inspection. Attendance is above the national average. Teaching is improving. There is some very good practice in the school. Current pupils are making faster progress than in the past. Leadership of the provision for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is strong. Pupils are very well supported. The school is welcoming and inclusive. The five ‘promises’ permeate all aspects of the school. The early years provision has improved. Leaders have a clear vision and are determined
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – all leaders evaluate the impact of their actions and amend plans accordingly to bring about continued and sustained improvements, including in the early years setting – senior leaders support the early years leader to be fully effective in her role. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – teachers use assessment information to plan activities that meet the needs of different groups of pupils – teaching assistants have the skills necessary to support pupils’ learning, including in the early years – teachers move pupils on to challenging work more quickly, including in the early years setting. Improve outcomes by: – embedding strategies to improve reading across the school – monitoring the teaching of phonics more closely and taking action to tackle weaknesses.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Since her appointment in September 2016, the headteacher has brought about significant improvement to all areas, following the school’s decline since its previous full inspection in November 2012. She has communicated a clear vision for school improvement and shared her high expectations of staff and pupils. Nevertheless, inconsistencies in the quality of education provided by the school remain. Leaders understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They have identified clear priorities, and improvement plans are detailed. However, not all leaders evaluate the impact of their actions with rigour and, therefore, do not amend plans swiftly enough to bring about improvements with enough urgency. Senior leaders have not provided sufficient support to the newly appointed early years leader. She has therefore been unable to fully implement her vision for the setting. The inspection which took place in January 2018, identified the need to urgently
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
improve the teaching of phonics. Leaders have not been effective in tackling this aspect of the school’s work. It has not been given the necessary priority and attention. Leaders have ensured that the pupil premium and the primary physical education (PE) and sport funding is used effectively. Leaders allocate the funding carefully. They do not yet evaluate its impact with enough precision to provide governors with the information that they need to hold leaders fully to account for its use. The effectiveness of middle leaders is variable. The English leader has taken effective action to improve the quality of English teaching in key stages 1 and 2. The leadership of mathematics is weaker and provision in this area is inconsistent as a result. Leaders have improved the quality of teaching, learning and assessment through the sharing of expectations, complemented by supportive coaching. A comprehensive
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
programme of staff training and professional development opportunities supports teachers to develop their practice. The curriculum is broad and balanced. Pupils of all ages study a wide range of subjects, including those delivered by specialists, such as French and outdoor learning. Pupils are extremely positive about these opportunities. The leadership of the provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is a strength of the school. The SENCo is strategic in her approach. She monitors and tracks pupils’ academic progress and pastoral well-being. She liaises with staff and external agencies so that pupils get the support that they need. The headteacher has introduced five ‘promises’ that encapsulate the school’s vision to: look after the world around us, keep everyone safe, keep everyone included, be honest and keep everyone learning. These values permeate all aspects of school life. The vast
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
majority of staff and pupils consider these in all that they do. This contributes to the welcoming and inclusive nature of the school. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well throughout the school. Pupils have a good understanding of fundamental British values.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors bring a range of experience and skills to their role. Responsibilities are assigned according to individuals’ expertise. They understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They validate information provided by school leaders, for example, by seeking external advice. Since the last inspection, governors have increased the level of their challenge to leaders. For example, middle leaders have been invited to governing body meetings to report on the impact of their actions against the school’s priorities. Governors have the skills and knowledge to hold leaders to account, and they do so effectively for most aspects of the school’s work. They recognise the need to ensure that they seek the detailed information that they need to hold leaders to account for the school’s use of the pupil premium and the primary PE and sport funding effectively.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff have received up-to-date training about safeguarding issues and understand their responsibilities and duties. The headteacher ensures that staff are kept well informed about ongoing safeguarding cases so that pupils are well monitored. Leaders take appropriate action if they have concerns over a pupil’s safety or well- being. They involve external agencies and are tenacious in following up referrals. Records are detailed and of high quality and kept securely. They contribute to leaders’ ability to closely monitor and support pupils in need. Pupils are well cared for. They feel safe in school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching is inconsistent across the school. Teachers do not routinely use information about what pupils are able to do to plan activities that meet the needs of different groups of learners. All pupils often work on the same activity, regardless of their ability. This means that the most able pupils are not sufficiently challenged and the least able are not effectively supported. Pupils are not routinely moved on to more challenging work quickly enough. Pupils say that they sometimes find their work too easy. Teachers do not consistently apply the school’s feedback policy. Pupils sometimes do not know what they need to do to improve their work. The teaching of phonics requires improvement. Some teachers do not have the skills and they lack confidence to be effective in this area of their practice. Pupils’ outcomes in phonics have declined in recent years. The SENCo has provided clearer direction for teaching assistants. Their effectiveness
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
has improved since the last inspection but remains inconsistent. Not all teaching assistants are well deployed. They do not all contribute to pupils’ progress as well as they should. The provision for pupils who speak English as an additional language is inconsistent. The English leader has ensured that teachers know how to support this group of pupils, and their needs are well met. Support for this group of pupils is less effective in mathematics. The teaching of English, particularly for older pupils, has improved considerably as the result of good leadership in this area. Reading for pleasure is promoted well across the school. Leaders have created an attractive library space that is centrally located. Reading is celebrated through displays. For example, pupils’ work, following workshops with a visiting poet, is displayed in corridors. Pupils are expected to read at home and teachers ensure that those who do
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
not have regular opportunities to do so are supported to practise their reading in school. Nevertheless, approaches to improving reading skills are not fully embedded. Relationships between teachers and pupils are positive. Pupils are keen to share their views with teachers and to participate in discussions. There is some very good teaching in the school. Some teachers plan sequential activities which build on prior learning. Work is well matched to pupils’ different abilities, and pupils make good progress. Teaching is particularly strong in Years 2 and 6. Where there is strong practice, teachers use questioning and discussion skilfully. Teachers probe pupils’ understanding and develop pupils’ reasoning skills. They support the least able pupils to work things out for themselves. Specialist subject teachers provide a very good quality of teaching, which both enriches pupils’ experiences and contributes to strong progress. For example, an inspector
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
observed a French lesson where very carefully planned activities and the use of targeted questioning supported pupils to develop their skills and extend their vocabulary very well.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development is good. Pupils understand the school’s values and consider these in their attitude and approach to school life. They are respectful, responsible and kind. Teachers support pupils to develop as responsible and independent learners. Pupils are confident and self-assured. They work well collaboratively and independently. Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe in a variety of situations. For example, they know how to protect themselves from the potential dangers of the internet, drugs and alcohol. Staff celebrate pupils’ success. Work by pupils of all abilities and ages is displayed around school. Pupils are keen to achieve awards, including badges earned through progress and effort. Much work is undertaken to promote pupils’ personal development and to enrich their experiences. For example, pupils from all year groups participate in residential visits,
p.5
Personal development and welfare
undertaking a variety of activities, including water sports, climbing and archery. There are also opportunities for pupils, of all ages, to develop their leadership skills. For example, older pupils take on roles as house captains and younger pupils are elected as class representatives, known as ‘mission leaders’. The school is highly inclusive. Pupils understand diversity and are respectful of those who have values and lifestyles that differ from their own. Pupils are equally respectful of those who have additional needs. Pupils understand what constitutes bullying. They recognise that some bullying occurs, but they say that it is dealt with swiftly and effectively by staff. Pupils know with whom they can speak if they have any concerns.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Leaders have shared clear expectations of pupils’ behaviour and introduced a simple system for managing behaviour. Pupils understand the expectations and respond accordingly. They conduct themselves well around school and at unstructured times. Most pupils attend very well. Whole school attendance, including that of disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities, has increased and is now above the national average. Persistent absence has reduced and is low. Pupils who speak English as an additional language do not attend as well as other pupils. Their rates of absence are higher than the national average. The vast majority of pupils behave very well in lessons. When teaching does not meet their needs, some pupils lose focus and concentration. Teachers do not always manage this effectively, which can lead to some low level disruption. Some younger pupils do
p.6
Behaviour
not always respond to teacher’s requests and instructions.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
In recent years, pupils have made slower progress by the end of key stage 2 than all pupils nationally. In 2017, the proportion of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, reaching the expected and higher standards in reading, writing and mathematics was below the national average. The proportion of pupils reaching the expected and greater depth standards in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of key stage 1 declined in 2018 and is likely to be considerably lower than that seen nationally. Pupils currently in Years 4 and 5 are making slower progress than other pupils in the school in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders have not taken swift enough action to improve the quality of teaching of phonics across the school. The proportion of pupils passing the phonics screening check has steadily declined in recent years. In 2017, it was considerably below the national average and declined further in 2018. However, many pupils catch up well by
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
the end of Year 2. In 2017, the proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard by the end of Year 2 was above the national average. Attainment in science was below the national average in key stages 1 and 2 in 2017. Leaders’ tracking information indicates that current pupils are making progress at a similar rate to other pupils nationally. Stronger teaching in Years 2 and 6 is helping pupils to make more rapid progress than other pupils in the school. Leaders’ expect the proportion of pupils reaching the expected and higher levels in reading, writing and mathematics in 2018 to be similar to that seen by all pupils nationally in 2017. Pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, achieve well in the English grammar, punctuation and spelling test. In 2017, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard was above the national average.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
The leader of the early years provision has a clear vision and is committed to providing a good quality of education for children when they start school. Since her appointment in January 2018, she has begun to bring about much needed improvement, but her actions have not yet had time to take full effect. A lack of capacity in the senior leadership team has meant that she has not been supported to be fully effective in her role. Leaders have identified appropriate priorities for improvement and plans are in place to address these. However, leaders do not evaluate the impact of their actions sharply or regularly. They are therefore unable to amend plans and adapt their actions to continually drive improvement. Plans are not rigorously implemented. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. The approach to planning is not fully effective. Adults do not consistently plan activities which meet children’s needs. Teachers and
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
adults do not always ensure that all children are actively engaged in purposeful activity. Leaders have introduced a new system for assessing and tracking children’s progress. This is beginning to support teachers’ ability to track children’s progress. However, leaders have not ensured that all staff have the skills necessary to use this effectively. Teaching assistants do not have the skills that are necessary to support children’s learning and development as well as they should. For example, their use of questioning does not develop children’s understanding, because they dominate the discussion or take over the direction of the activity. Teachers and adults do not always ensure that children demonstrate positive behaviour. A small number of children do not respond to adults’ requests or instructions. The teaching of phonics is improving. Increasingly, the most able children are well challenged and the least able are well supported. Children who speak English as an
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
additional language are effectively supported and make good progress. Leaders emphasise the importance of reading and writing. Activities are planned around a storybook and there are many books available for children to enjoy. The early years leader continually works to develop children’s reading skills. For example, when a boy was talking about the shark in his book, the leader supported him to identify the rhyme ‘park’. Some teaching is good. The early years leader, for example, is skilled in encouraging children’s development through questioning and encouraging children to refer to their prior learning. The proportion of children, including disadvantaged children, reaching a good level of development has increased steadily over recent years. It is now similar to the national average. The vast majority of children are well prepared to start Year 1. The curriculum provides opportunities for children to widen their experiences.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
The behaviour and conduct of the majority of children are good. Children collaborate well. For example, when one child was struggling to reach some painting resources another said, ‘Let me help you.’ They are respectful of one another. Children are happy. There has been considerable investment in the environment of the early years setting. Children benefit from a vibrant, welcoming physical environment that provides a range of stimulus. The setting is very well resourced. Safeguarding is effective. Staff liaise with the designated safeguarding lead when they have concerns and appropriate action is taken. Staff know individual children well. This supports safeguarding arrangements.
p.8
School details
Local authority Nottinghamshire County Council
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address headteacher@holyfamily.notts.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 30 January 2018
p.9
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is lower than average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities, and those who have an education, health and care plan, is lower than the national average. The majority of pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is higher than average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning in all classes, some jointly with senior leaders. Discussions were held with senior and middle leaders, other staff, members of the governing body and the local authority adviser. Inspectors looked at pupils’ work in lessons and a sample of pupils’ books. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons, around school, at breaktime and at lunchtime. Inspectors spoke with pupils in discussion groups, in lessons and informally around the school. The lead inspector listened to a group of pupils reading. Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documents, including the school’s self- evaluation, its improvement plans, minutes of meetings of the governing body, information about the attainment and progress of all pupils, records relating to behaviour and safeguarding, and information on the school’s website. Inspectors considered the 45 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View,
p.10
Information about this inspection
and 55 free-text responses. They also spoke to a number of parents before school to ascertain their views. Inspectors considered the responses to Ofsted’s questionnaires from six pupils and 20 staff.
p.10
Inspection team
Deborah Mosley, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Emma Hollis-Brown Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion