Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Nicholas' School

Inspected 12 Jul 2018 · published 6 Sept 2018 · URN 119059

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Jul 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Maxine Mcdonald-Taylor

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CT1 3JJ

  • Name on report verified

    St Nicholas’ School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressgood progresshighly skilledenjoyimprovedvery wellhigh expectationspositive
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings734w+90
  • What needs to improve52w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
781
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Daniel Lewis Headteacher St Nicholas’ School Holm Oak Close Nunnery Fields Canterbury Kent CT1 3JJ

p.1

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

Following my visit to the school on 12 July 2018 with Mark Dale-Emberton, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and other leaders provide pupils with a calm, friendly and supportive environment in which to learn. Pupils are happy and well behaved, and enjoy school, with one stating, ‘School is perfect.’ Pupils are engaged in lessons and proud of their work.

p.1

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

You and other leaders are passionate about striving to improve the outcomes and life chances for all pupils. Along with senior leaders, you ensure that all pupils continue to make good progress. Your staff have strong knowledge of the individual needs of pupils, and are committed to promoting their well-being and independence skills.

p.1

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

You are reflective and have an accurate view of the effectiveness of your school. You have successfully introduced new strategies which have addressed the areas for improvement from the last inspection. You have identified aspects of the school’s provision that could be better and, along with other leaders, have plans in place to develop these swiftly. You recognise that the request from some parents for improved communication between school and home is a priority for you and other leaders.

p.1

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

Governors are insightful and well informed, and know the school very well. They visit regularly and have high expectations for all pupils. The monitoring of safeguarding practice forms an important part of governors’ visits. Parents and carers are largely very positive about the school, with one parent stating: ‘The individuality of each pupil is acknowledged and very complex needs met in a kind and respectful manner.’

p.1

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

Leaders have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements in the school are fit for purpose. Records are detailed and thorough and you and your team all have a clear understanding of safeguarding procedures.

p.2

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

You have effective communication systems within school, including between the different sites, and with outside agencies. These systems, along with the in-depth knowledge your staff have of pupils, ensure that any concerns are noticed and acted upon as soon as possible so that pupils remain safe.

p.2

Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School

This is a caring school. Trusting, understanding relationships between staff and pupils result in pupils feeling safe and secure. They are taught how to keep themselves safe, including when online.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Pupils make very good progress during their time at the school. You encourage and support pupils to aim high. As a result, in addition to academic progress, pupils make very good progress with their behaviour, independence and physical development. You make sure that lessons are motivating and designed to meet the individual needs of pupils, and that routines and expectations of pupils are clear. This enables them to understand their work, enjoy their learning and find the curriculum fun and engaging. Satellite provision in local schools provides pupils with invaluable social inclusion opportunities which allow them to thrive.  Pupils are given many opportunities to practise and develop their functional literacy and numeracy skills throughout the day. For example, pupils in a cookery lesson had used their numeracy skills to work out the cost of the dish they were making. Students in a sixth-form enterprise lesson were learning to use money in

p.2

Inspection findings

a variety of appropriate ways. Phonics teaching is engaging and at an appropriate level for each pupil, helping all to make good progress with their reading and writing.  You, along with other leaders and governors, regularly review all aspects of the school’s provision. The safety and welfare of pupils are your first priority. You have put in place effective new strategies and procedures to ensure that each pupil is secure and safe in school.  Leaders are highly skilled and knowledgeable, and continually look for ways to further improve the school. You have listened to the views of parents and recognise that communication between school and pupils’ families could be better. Your family support team has already had a positive impact but you understand that there is still work to do in this area.

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 communication between the school and parents is further improved.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

My colleague and I met with you and other leaders. We visited lessons on three different sites with you and the deputy headteacher. We spoke to some pupils in class and looked through their work. We held meetings with key staff about the progress of pupils and safeguarding. We also met with a group of pupils and, separately, with a group of staff to hear their views about the school. We met with governors, spoke with the lead for education and safeguarding in Kent, and spoke with a representative from the local authority. We considered responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. We considered the responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for parents, Parent View, spoke to a number of parents at the end of the school day and telephoned parents to hear their views. We took into account a letter given to us. We scrutinised a range of the school’s documentation and a selection of pupils’ work.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion