Schools & FE · Short school inspection
St Nicholas' School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Jul 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Maxine Mcdonald-Taylor
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CT1 3JJ
- Name on report verified
St Nicholas’ School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils are happy and well behaved, and enjoy school, with one stating, ‘School is perfect.’ Pupils are engaged in lessons and proud of their work. p.1
- Leaders are highly skilled and knowledgeable, and continually look for ways to further improve the school. p.2
- Parents and carers are largely very positive about the school, with one parent stating: ‘The individuality of each pupil is acknowledged and very complex needs met in a kind and respectful manner.’ p.1
- Phonics teaching is engaging and at an appropriate level for each pupil, helping all to make good progress with their reading and writing. p.2
- Governors are insightful and well informed, and know the school very well. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 781
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Daniel Lewis Headteacher St Nicholas’ School Holm Oak Close Nunnery Fields Canterbury Kent CT1 3JJ
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
Following my visit to the school on 12 July 2018 with Mark Dale-Emberton, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and other leaders provide pupils with a calm, friendly and supportive environment in which to learn. Pupils are happy and well behaved, and enjoy school, with one stating, ‘School is perfect.’ Pupils are engaged in lessons and proud of their work.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
You and other leaders are passionate about striving to improve the outcomes and life chances for all pupils. Along with senior leaders, you ensure that all pupils continue to make good progress. Your staff have strong knowledge of the individual needs of pupils, and are committed to promoting their well-being and independence skills.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
You are reflective and have an accurate view of the effectiveness of your school. You have successfully introduced new strategies which have addressed the areas for improvement from the last inspection. You have identified aspects of the school’s provision that could be better and, along with other leaders, have plans in place to develop these swiftly. You recognise that the request from some parents for improved communication between school and home is a priority for you and other leaders.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
Governors are insightful and well informed, and know the school very well. They visit regularly and have high expectations for all pupils. The monitoring of safeguarding practice forms an important part of governors’ visits. Parents and carers are largely very positive about the school, with one parent stating: ‘The individuality of each pupil is acknowledged and very complex needs met in a kind and respectful manner.’
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
Leaders have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements in the school are fit for purpose. Records are detailed and thorough and you and your team all have a clear understanding of safeguarding procedures.
p.2
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
You have effective communication systems within school, including between the different sites, and with outside agencies. These systems, along with the in-depth knowledge your staff have of pupils, ensure that any concerns are noticed and acted upon as soon as possible so that pupils remain safe.
p.2
Short inspection of St Nicholas’ School
This is a caring school. Trusting, understanding relationships between staff and pupils result in pupils feeling safe and secure. They are taught how to keep themselves safe, including when online.
p.2
Inspection findings
Pupils make very good progress during their time at the school. You encourage and support pupils to aim high. As a result, in addition to academic progress, pupils make very good progress with their behaviour, independence and physical development. You make sure that lessons are motivating and designed to meet the individual needs of pupils, and that routines and expectations of pupils are clear. This enables them to understand their work, enjoy their learning and find the curriculum fun and engaging. Satellite provision in local schools provides pupils with invaluable social inclusion opportunities which allow them to thrive. Pupils are given many opportunities to practise and develop their functional literacy and numeracy skills throughout the day. For example, pupils in a cookery lesson had used their numeracy skills to work out the cost of the dish they were making. Students in a sixth-form enterprise lesson were learning to use money in
p.2
Inspection findings
a variety of appropriate ways. Phonics teaching is engaging and at an appropriate level for each pupil, helping all to make good progress with their reading and writing. You, along with other leaders and governors, regularly review all aspects of the school’s provision. The safety and welfare of pupils are your first priority. You have put in place effective new strategies and procedures to ensure that each pupil is secure and safe in school. Leaders are highly skilled and knowledgeable, and continually look for ways to further improve the school. You have listened to the views of parents and recognise that communication between school and pupils’ families could be better. Your family support team has already had a positive impact but you understand that there is still work to do in this area.
p.2
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
communication between the school and parents is further improved.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
My colleague and I met with you and other leaders. We visited lessons on three different sites with you and the deputy headteacher. We spoke to some pupils in class and looked through their work. We held meetings with key staff about the progress of pupils and safeguarding. We also met with a group of pupils and, separately, with a group of staff to hear their views about the school. We met with governors, spoke with the lead for education and safeguarding in Kent, and spoke with a representative from the local authority. We considered responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. We considered the responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire for parents, Parent View, spoke to a number of parents at the end of the school day and telephoned parents to hear their views. We took into account a letter given to us. We scrutinised a range of the school’s documentation and a selection of pupils’ work.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion