Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Andrew's Primary School
Summary
Alexander Baxter (lead), Jane Johns, Katherine Powell
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Jul 2018
- Inspectors verified
Alexander Baxter, Jane Johns, Katherine Powell
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
EX15 1HU
- Name on report verified
St Andrew’s Primary School
- URN verified
142183
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils who speak English as an additional language make rapid progress due to the strong teaching and support that they receive. p.1
- The headteacher, well supported by senior leaders and governors, leads the school with clear vision and strong ambition. p.1
- They respond well to effective teaching and assessment and make good progress. p.8
- Leadership of early years is effective and ensures that children behave and learn well in a nurturing environment. p.8
- They are respectful towards adults and one another and enjoy coming to school. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Raise attainment by the end of Year 2 by teachers using accurate assessment information to ensure that teaching secures a strong start and rapid progress through key stage 1. p.2
- Embed the new curriculum so that learning activities enable more pupils to exceed the standards expected across the range of subjects by the time they leave the school. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,314
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Andrew’s Primary School St Andrews Estate, Cullompton, Devon EX15 1HU
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Senior leaders of the multi-academy trust have taken effective action to improve systematically the school since conversion to academy status in 2015. The headteacher, well supported by senior leaders and governors, leads the school with clear vision and strong ambition. Leaders show a strong capacity to bring further improvement. This is evident, for example, in pupils’ accelerated progress through key stage 2. The quality of teaching and learning is good. Teachers have secure subject knowledge and use questioning well to promote pupils’ thinking. Pupils’ good learning is evident in the way they rise to the challenge of explaining their ideas in lessons. The school’s values of ‘cherish, nurture, aspire, achieve’ permeate day-to-day activity and successfully promote the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Staff are caring and well-trained in safeguarding. They provide high-quality
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
pastoral support to ensure that pupils are kept safe and feel safe at school. Leaders provide a broad and balanced curriculum which promotes effective learning. However, increased learning experiences designed to help pupils achieve greater depth in their learning are not yet embedded to equally good effect across the school. Pupils have positive attitudes towards their learning. They are respectful towards adults and one another and enjoy coming to school. Pupils behave well and are keen learners. They speak proudly about the school and their improved achievements. Pupils who speak English as an additional language make rapid progress due to the strong teaching and support that they receive. Most pupils make good progress. This includes disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. Some middle-ability and most-able pupils have not progressed well enough over time,
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
particularly by the end of key stage 1. Children get off to a good start in the early years. They learn well because of good teaching and high-quality care.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Raise attainment by the end of Year 2 by teachers using accurate assessment information to ensure that teaching secures a strong start and rapid progress through key stage 1. Embed the new curriculum so that learning activities enable more pupils to exceed the standards expected across the range of subjects by the time they leave the school.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The headteacher, ably supported by other senior leaders in the school and across the academy trust, is driving this school forward in a determined and effective manner. They all share the same commitment and have a clear vision about what they need to do to bring further improvement. Senior leaders within the school and across the trust have worked effectively to improve teaching and the way pupils’ progress is checked and recorded. They have provided training for staff to ensure the accuracy of these assessments, including good support for newly qualified teachers. As a result, leaders now have a secure understanding of where improvement is need. This is evident in the school’s well- focused self-evaluation and school improvement plans. The school’s strong capacity to bring about further improvement is evident in the raised standards of pupils’ attainment at the end of early years and key stage 2. It is
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
also seen in the much higher proportion of pupils passing the Year 1 phonics screening check this year. Leaders are taking determined action to increase the proportion of pupils attaining expected standards at the end of Year 2. They are developing teaching and the curriculum further in order for more pupils across the school to develop higher levels of skill. This work has not yet been sustained long enough to achieve this. Middle leaders have been recruited carefully and trained well to carry out their roles. They understand their specific responsibilities and are increasingly collaborating with colleagues to widen their understanding of strengths and weaknesses across the school. Some are new to their posts and have not yet fully embedded recent improvements in their areas of responsibility, for example the newly planned curriculum. Leaders promote equality of opportunity effectively. For example, they liaise closely
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
with outside specialists to ensure that pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are supported effectively. This ensures that additional funding is targeted effectively to meet pupils’ different needs and secures their good personal and academic development. Leaders focus well on ensuring that the additional funding provides effective support for disadvantaged pupils and those who have English as an additional language. As a result, these pupils are making progress that at least matches and sometimes exceeds that of their classmates. The curriculum is broad and balanced. It is enriched by visits, such as to Becky Falls and topics such as ‘Extreme Earth’ that enthuse pupils’ interest in learning. Art and sports receive a strong focus both in lessons and various clubs. The school has introduced a newly planned curriculum designed to widen pupils’ skills and deepen their understanding across the range of subjects. This has not been embedded with
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
equal success in all classes and does not yet enable those pupils with the potential to attain high standards. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is skilfully woven through the everyday life of the school. For example, assembly themes such as ‘ Forgiveness’ enrich their awareness of the views of others. Topics and discussions about suffragettes, the rule of law and Brexit advance their understanding of British values. The school makes very efficient use of the additional funding for physical education and sport. It has had a profound effect in recent years in improving pupils’ behaviour and enjoyment of school. Funding is used effectively in a variety of ways, including the employment of specialist coaches. Pupils have good opportunities to compete and have a chance to shine in sport. This has encouraged more of them to join sports clubs out of school. The large majority of parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
View, would recommend St Andrew’s to other parents. Some are very appreciative of the way staff care for them and their children, ’especially when we need it most’. Parents’ views were typified by one parent, who wrote to say, ‘We’re happy with St Andrews and thank them for educating our children and preparing them for the next stage of their education.’ The inspectors noted the much-increased number of parents attending parents’ evenings. They observed the warm relationships between staff and parents as they brought their children to school each day. However, a small minority of parents indicated that they would value closer lines of communication with staff.
p.4
Governance of the school
Leaders of the multi-academy trust and members of the local governing body are ambitious for the school, its staff and its pupils. Since assuming responsibility for the school following conversion to academy status in 2015, trust leaders have sustained a determined and effective commitment to improving the school. Minutes, and records of governors’ questioning of staff leaders, show that they hold them to account effectively. Consequently, they gain a secure knowledge of the school’s strengths and areas in need of improvement. Recent actions, such as updating and enriching resources for learning in the early years classes, have aided staff leaders in bringing about improvement. This is acknowledged by parents; as one typically wrote, ‘I have had the pleasure in seeing St Andrew’s School grow from strength to strength within the last two years.’ Governors’ and trust leaders’ checks on the use of additional funding are
p.4
Governance of the school
comprehensive and well founded. Governors with specific responsibilities visit the school regularly and consult with staff and pupils to examine the degree to which these funds help pupils to progress. By these means governors and trust leaders ensure that funds are used well to support disadvantaged pupils, those who have English as an additional language and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders across the trust and in the school ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. These include high-quality records and checks of all adults who spend time in the school in support of the pupils. When questioned about safeguarding procedures teachers and support staff referred to regular training and showed good understanding of their responsibilities. For example, staff training in the ‘Prevent’ duty has ensured that they know how to keep pupils safe from radicalisation and extremism. The school works well with parents to create a strong culture of safeguarding. Staff are vigilant in monitoring and supporting vulnerable pupils and their families. Staff know the pupils well, how to react and who to contact if they have any concerns. Pupils stated that they feel safe at school. This view is also evident in pupils’ and their
p.4
Safeguarding
parents’ responses to the Ofsted questionnaire. Parents’ responses typically included, ‘St Andrew’s Primary School have consistently gone above and beyond in their duty of care for both our children, and us as parents.’
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Leaders across the trust and within the school have utilised the breadth of teaching expertise available to provide additional training for teachers and teaching assistants. As a result, teaching is good and is continuing to improve across the school. Teaching in early years and across key stage 2 is successfully moving pupils’ learning forward quickly. This stems from the teachers’ accurate checks of pupils’ skills and effective use of the information gathered to meet the needs of different groups of pupils. This is not as effective across key stage 1, and recent improvements have not been sustained long enough to bridge all gaps in previous learning. The teaching of phonics across early years and key stage 1 classes is strong. This academic year it has substantially increased the proportion of pupils deepening their phonic understanding and developing the skills expected for their age. Not all current
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
pupils in key stages 1 and 2 have had a good grounding in phonics in the past and this led to difficulties in some pupils being able to spell words correctly. Nevertheless, teachers across key stage 2 have taught reading well and helped pupils to sustain good progress in developing reading skills. Pupils’ improved understanding of phonics means that they are better placed to improve their spelling and to achieve their full potential in writing and reading in the future. Teachers and teaching assistants have detailed knowledge of the different needs of individual pupils. This enables them to support pupils across the range of ability effectively. Provision for pupils who have English as an additional language is particularly effective. It is underpinned by specialist additional teaching and support from skilled staff. Teachers and caring teaching assistants are similarly successful in supporting pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities, especially those have more
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
complex needs. Teachers have improved their support for disadvantaged pupils. They have raised their expectations of what pupils should achieve and challenge pupils through well-targeted questioning. This is particularly evident across key stage 2, where focused additional adult support is helping to close previous gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills more rapidly. For example, during mathematics in Year 6, pupils across the range of ability responded well to the teacher’s questions and deepened their knowledge of the area and perimeter of shapes. Teachers across key stage 2 involve pupils effectively in checking their own work and empower them to become effective learners. Teachers are increasingly challenging the most able to think deeply about their work. This is especially the case in mathematics, where pupils are making good progress in developing their reasoning and problem- solving skills.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Deepening pupils’ thinking is not yet as effective in some classes in key stage 1. Similarly, the teachers’ use of the new curriculum to enrich pupils’ learning, especially in writing, is not yet fully embedded across the school. As a result, it is not yet accomplishing the intended influence of helping pupils achieve higher levels of skills than those expected for their age.
p.6
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Leaders’ monitoring to ensure that procedures are followed is robust and boosts pupils’ well-being and confidence in learning. Pupils respond well to a variety of stimulating curriculum topics such as ‘Fly Me to the Moon’. They enjoy investigating and sharing ideas and show good attitudes towards learning. Most pupils in all classes respond eagerly to teachers’ questions and respect each other’s ideas and suggestions. Pupils accept various leadership roles in a mature manner. For example, pupils contribute well to the daily life of the school as monitors and take responsibility for checking house points each week. Relationships between adults and pupils and between pupils are strong and enrich learning across the school. This is noticed and appreciated by parents, one of whom wrote, ‘My son has commented on how he has noticed that the children respect the
p.6
Personal development and welfare
teachers.’ At times, a small number of pupils still need, and receive, close guidance from adults to stay focused and fully engaged in learning. Pupils report that they feel safe in school and would quickly tell an adult if they had any worries or concerns. Almost all the parents who responded to the online questionnaire fully support this view. Pupils demonstrate a clear understanding of how to stay safe and help each other to keep safe, including when using social media and computers.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils enjoy school. They are courteous and polite to visitors and move around the school sensibly and considerately. The vast majority of pupils behave well and care deeply about how their behaviour affects others. Behaviour is much better now than it has been at times in the past. However, a small number of pupils still need the support of sanctions and support from staff to secure appropriate behaviour. When questioned about bullying, pupils told inspectors that ‘it very rarely happens’ and indicate that their teachers quickly sort out any issues. When asked what they would change at school, pupils firmly replied, ‘We would keep it the same.’ The overwhelming majority of parents who responded to the online questionnaire support this view. Pupils’ rate of attendance is slightly below average but is improving. This reflects leaders’ strong action to overcome persistent absence. Although there is still persistent
p.6
Behaviour
absence, it is by a much-reduced number of pupils. Pupils’ increased enjoyment in learning and the school’s closer support of families in recent years are reflected in pupils’ improved punctuality.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
Sustained improvements in teaching and pupils’ learning in recent years, especially across key stage 2, have ensured that pupils make significantly better progress than in the past. Pupils, more recently across key stage 1, are responding well to the teachers’ raised expectations of behaviour and effort and are also beginning to make better progress. In the past, the results of the Year 1 phonics screening checks have been consistently lower than the national average. Currently, in response to strengthened teaching of phonics across early years and Year 1, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard is well above average. Pupils heard reading, in particular those in Years 3 and 6, read confidently with fluency and expression. When questioned, they showed that they can infer meaning from the text they are reading, describe main characters and make sensible predictions about how the story might develop.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
Pupils in most year groups are currently making at least good progress in English and mathematics from their different starting points . Pupils currently in Year 2 are now also making faster progress as a result of improved teaching. Attainment at the end of Year 2 remain below average, especially in writing. However, a high proportion of these pupils have SEN and/or disabilities or have English as an additional language. They are making stronger progress but are not yet reaching the standard expected for their age. Parents identify and express appreciation of the substantial improvements made to pupils’ achievements. One parent commented , ‘School has drastically improved over the past few years.’ Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities learn well. Like their classmates, they are making faster progress than in the past because of improvements in teaching and the support they receive. Pupils who have English as an additional language make at least good progress. Some
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
of these pupils have made significant gains in their learning. This is because they have received strong support to develop their ability to speak and write in English and access the additional learning that this brings. Pupils regularly practise calculation skills in mathematics and, in most classes, apply these to solve problems. On occasion, in some classes, pupils are not provided with mathematics work that challenges them to think deeply. As a result, some most-able and previously middle-attaining pupils, including some who are disadvantaged, do not attain at a high standard in mathematics. Due to past weakness in learning phonics, pupils’ writing, most often spelling, is not well developed, particularly at the end of key stage 1. Pupils participate and achieve well in sports. They learn well in art, history and geography and, for example, discuss and write about life today compared to life in
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
Ancient Egypt. Disadvantaged pupils are making good progress. This is as a result of effective monitoring by leaders and improved assessment of their needs by teachers. Teaching assistants are also adapting the support they provide for these pupils to secure effective learning.
p.8
Early years provision Good
Children get off to a good start in the early years. They respond well to effective teaching and assessment and make good progress. Staff ensure that children are stimulated by an exciting range of experiences and are taking full advantage of the much-improved and now spacious learning facilities. This is evident in the year-on-year increase in the proportion of children achieving a good level of development by the end of Reception. It also reflects the beneficial impact of the academy’s investment and commitment to improving the school. Leadership of early years is effective and ensures that children behave and learn well in a nurturing environment. The leader is well supported by senior leaders in the school and across the academy. They make sure that staff are well trained in welfare and that safeguarding requirements are fully implemented to keep children safe and secure. Leaders have strengthened the way that teachers assess children’s skills and progress.
p.8
Early years provision Good
Consequently, teachers now have a secure understanding of areas that need developing. Teachers and teaching assistants work closely together to assess children’s needs and plan activities that help children to make good progress. The improved teaching of phonics, for example, keeps pupils engaged and motivated to learn. The children’s ability to sound out letters accurately is supporting their early reading. The much higher scores of pupils in the Year 1 phonics screening check this year also reflect improved teaching and learning in the Reception class. Staff cultivate productive and supportive links with parents, for example a well- organised induction session welcoming new children and their parents to the school that took place during the inspection. Parents appreciate the staff’s efforts to support their children, with one typical comment being, ‘My child gets all the help he needs.’ Teachers and teaching assistants use questioning effectively to keep children
p.8
Early years provision Good
purposefully engaged in learning and to develop their independence. All children, including the disadvantaged, those who have English as an additional language and those who have SEN and/or disabilities, enjoy learning. They are well equipped for a confident transition into Year 1. Most children make good progress across the areas of learning. Although improving, a small number of the most able are not yet reaching the high standards of which they are capable. Teachers provide a good range of opportunities to help children develop personal and social skills. For example, stimulated by their topic of ‘Pirates’, children enjoyed role play and shared ideas in the ‘Pirates Lair’. Staff use the children’s interest in topics to develop their physical and coordination skills. For example, children ‘walked the plank’ enthusiastically and, guided by the teacher, showed good agility and balance when landing.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.9
Information about this school
St Andrew’s School became an academy and was sponsored by the Primary Academies Trust, now named the Ventrus Multi-Academy Trust, in September 2015. Governance is undertaken at local level by a governing body and at multi-academy level by a board of trust directors. St Andrew’s is above average in size. The majority of pupils are from White British backgrounds. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is above average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is broadly average. Children experience early years provision in two Reception classes. An after-school club is managed by an outside provider and was not part of this inspection. This is the school’s first inspection since the predecessor school, St Andrew’s Primary School, was identified as requiring improvement in March 2014. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics
p.9
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed learning in 24 lessons and saw the work of all teachers. The headteacher and deputy headteacher accompanied the inspectors during most of these visits to lessons. A wide range of documents were scrutinised, including records relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance, safeguarding procedures and the school’s self-evaluation. The inspectors examined the school’s systems for checking progress and records of checks on the quality of teaching. The inspectors talked to individual pupils during lessons and breaktimes about the school and their work. They listened to individual pupils reading to teachers and teaching assistants and attended assemblies. The inspectors looked at samples of pupils’ work across a range of subjects and classes. The lead inspector met with a representative of the local governing body and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust.
p.11
Information about this inspection
The inspectors held meetings with senior school leaders and the director of standards of the trust. Inspectors spoke informally with teaching assistants and support staff. They also met with specialist staff of the multi-academy trust. The inspectors examined the views expressed in 51 responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and in 50 parents’ additional comments. The inspectors also considered the views expressed in 38 staff questionnaires and took note of 18 pupils’ responses to questionnaires. A team inspector gathered the views of several parents during informal meetings at the school.
p.11
Inspection team
Alexander Baxter, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Jane Johns Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion