Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Action For Children Developments Ltd
- Group reference verified
RP539433
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2018
- Inspectors verified
Anja Eribake
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SW10 0ST
- Name on report verified
Spring - Cheyne
- URN verified
EY541114
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The acting manager fails to identify all weaknesses in safeguarding practices. p.1
- These weaknesses compromise children's welfare. p.1
- Therefore, risk assessments for the use of the outdoors are not sufficiently robust. p.3
- Although the acting manager understands the importance of monitoring attendance, she has failed to identify and address this. p.1
- Staff's ongoing assessment of children's progress is not effective. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff are generally aware of children's interests and plan activities that reflect these. p.3
- Most staff make regular observations of children's play and identify the next steps in their learning. p.3
- However, they do not consistently include information from parents about their children's development in the assessment process. p.3
- This means that assessments of children are not always accurate. p.3
- Staff offer experiences that are not consistently challenging enough to engage the most able children fully and extend their learning opportunities. p.3
- Babies enjoy looking at books independently and interact with their peers. p.3
- They make actions and sounds when looking at the pictures, demonstrating the communication skills expected of them. p.3
- Children acquire some of the skills needed in preparation for school. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies4
“maintain an accurate record of children's attendance 24/07/2018” p.2Progress & outcomes4
“Staff's ongoing assessment of children's progress is not effective.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 797
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Spring - Cheyne 10 Thorndike Close, LONDON, SW10 0ST
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 10 July 2018 Not applicable
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The provider has not put effective systems in place to monitor the practice of all staff, including the manager, to ensure they are clear about their roles and responsibilities. The acting manager fails to identify all weaknesses in safeguarding practices. She does not ensure that staff complete effective checks of the environment to minimise risks to children's safety. These weaknesses compromise children's welfare. Staff do not accurately record the hours of attendance of children. Although the acting manager understands the importance of monitoring attendance, she has failed to identify and address this. Staff's ongoing assessment of children's progress is not effective. They do not involve all parents in the process, apart from when children first start. The manager is not monitoring the accuracy of staff's assessments of the progress children make to help identify and address any areas where they may need extra support.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Although self-evaluation is being conducted, it is not fully effective. Some of the weaknesses have been identified and an action plan implemented to address the areas for improvement. However, it is too soon to see the impact of the actions taken.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are supported to be independent. Staff provide age-appropriate opportunities for children to be involved in daily routines, such as serving food and tidying up. Staff are good role models and promote positive behaviour in children.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
put effective systems in place to monitor the practice of the manager and staff to ensure they are clear about their roles and responsibilities 28/08/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure staff use risk assessments effectively to identify and eliminate all potential safety hazards to children, paying particular attention to the garden and babies' bathroom area? 24/07/2018
p.2
Due Date
maintain an accurate record of children's attendance 24/07/2018 ensure assessment systems are effective and provide an accurate view of the progress individual and specific groups of children are making to help target teaching. 28/08/2018
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
make effective use of self-evaluation to identify all weaknesses in practice and rectify all breaches in requirements to improve the quality of the provision.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspection was carried out following a risk assessment process. The inspector had a tour of the premises, inside and outside, observing the children at play and their interactions with the staff to assess the impact on children's learning. The inspector looked at evidence of the suitability of staff working with children. She also looked at a range of other documentation, including policies and procedures. The inspector completed a joint observation with the acting manager to help evaluate and discuss staff's practice. The inspector spoke with parents, staff and children at various times during the inspection, taking their views into account.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is not effective. Leadership is weak and the provider has not been able to establish a secure management team. At the time of the inspection a temporary manager was in post. However, the provider has not given effective induction, support, supervision and coaching for the manager to ensure that she is able to fulfil her role and responsibilities. The acting manager does not ensure that all staff follow, and implement, the setting's policies and procedures. This puts children's safety and welfare at risk. For example, the outdoor area is shared with another provision and staff are not always clear about the arrangements. Therefore, risk assessments for the use of the outdoors are not sufficiently robust. Staff have a suitable knowledge about child protection, including signs that help identify any concerns about a child's safety and welfare.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff are generally aware of children's interests and plan activities that reflect these. Most staff make regular observations of children's play and identify the next steps in their learning. However, they do not consistently include information from parents about their children's development in the assessment process. This means that assessments of children are not always accurate. Staff offer experiences that are not consistently challenging enough to engage the most able children fully and extend their learning opportunities. Babies enjoy looking at books independently and interact with their peers. They make actions and sounds when looking at the pictures, demonstrating the communication skills expected of them.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The learning environment does not consistently ensure the safety of the younger children. They enjoy exploring the outdoor environment, but staff do not ensure that it is free of litter. The area used for changing nappies and handwashing is cluttered and staff do not recognise potential hazards. Staff do not keep an accurate record of children's attendance, as required, and are unable to monitor irregularities or reasons for absences. This compromises the welfare of children. Nevertheless, children are happy and freely explore the resources and activities available. Staff support children to settle and help them develop friendly relationships with each other.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children acquire some of the skills needed in preparation for school. They independently choose resources and activities to initiate their own play. Older children are able to ask staff for help, or for additional resources, to increase their learning experiences. Children demonstrate the social skills expected for their age. However, due to some weaknesses in the quality of teaching and assessment, not all children are fully challenged in their learning to make the best possible progress.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY541114 Local authority Kensington & Chelsea Inspection number 1139954 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 63 Number of children on roll 66 Name of registered person Action For Children Developments Ltd
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection Not applicable Telephone number 020 7349 1650
p.4
reference number
Spring - Cheyne day nursery registered in 2017. The setting is located in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The nursery is open Monday to Friday from 8am until 5.45pm, for 51 weeks of the year. The nursery receives funding to provide free early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children. There are 12 members of staff, of whom, one holds qualified teacher status, one holds an early years qualification at level 6, and other staff have relevant early years qualifications ranging from level 3 to 5.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion