Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The Rosewood School

Inspected 4 Jul 2018 · published 23 Jul 2018 · URN 135432

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Emma Sanderson (lead), Andrew Hogarth, Julie Sackett, Sue Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    4 Jul 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Andrew Hogarth, Emma Sanderson, Julie Sackett, Sue Cox

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    ME19 5FF

  • Name on report verified

    Kent Health Needs Education Service

  • URN verified

    135432

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveconfidentconsistentlyhigh-qualityfeel safeeffectivelyexcellent
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlygapsinconsistentweaknessesconcernsnot alwaysdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings735w+15
  • Leadership173w+17
  • Safeguarding103w+33
  • What needs to improve1348w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,295
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 6%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 43%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Kent Health Needs Education Service 40 Teddington Drive, Leybourne, West Malling, Kent ME19 5FF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Since the merger of Kent’s alternative provisions in September 2015, turbulence in staffing at all levels has hampered improvement. As a result, outcomes for pupils and the quality of teaching are not consistently good.  There are noticeable differences in the quality of education that pupils receive across the six hubs. High-quality teaching and learning are not consistent across the provision.  Not all teachers use the assessment information available to identify what should be taught to support pupils’ learning and challenge them appropriately.  The deployment of teaching assistants is not always as effective as it could be.  Historically, those responsible for governance have not held leaders to account for the effectiveness of the provision. Consequently, the necessary actions to improve the provision were not identified quickly enough.  Pupils’ outcomes vary both across the provision and within subjects. As a result, not all pupils

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

are making the progress that they are capable of throughout the curriculum.  Many subject leaders are new to post. They do not focus sharply enough on the impact their work has on pupils’ progress and outcomes, when monitoring the quality of teaching.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The newly established leadership team has an accurate view of the provision’s strengths and weaknesses. It has implemented the necessary changes to improve the quality across the hubs.  The new management committee holds leaders rigorously to account for the work of the provision.  The quality of education at the Oakfields, Ebbsfleet, Southborough and Ashford hubs is a strength. Pupils benefit from strong teaching that meets their individual needs.  Pupils behave well, showing respect and tolerance for each other’s views and opinions. They feel safe and are confident to speak to adults if they have any worries.  Almost all pupils go on to further education, training or employment when they leave the provision.  Safeguarding is effective.  The promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is strong.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and learning, and pupils’ outcomes across the provision, by ensuring that all teachers: – challenge pupils to achieve what they are capable of – use the information they have about what pupils can do, know and understand to inform their planning  Strengthen leadership and management by: – developing the role of middle leaders so that they can improve teaching and learning in their subjects across all hubs – embedding the new policies and procedures to improve rigour and consistency across the provision – refining the systems for tracking pupils’ progress so leaders are confident to use them to evaluate the impact of provision on pupils’ outcomes – ensuring that teaching assistants consistently support pupils’ learning.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Some turbulence in senior leadership and periods of instability in staffing have led to an inconsistent standard of education across the provision. As a result, the quality of education that pupils receive is not consistently good across the hubs, and the tuition and outreach service.  Leaders have accurately identified where improvement is needed across the provision. Leaders are taking swift action and are continually monitoring the progress towards reaching specific targets. However, it is unclear how these actions will result in an improvement in pupils’ outcomes.  Leaders have developed a new assessment system to accurately track pupils’ attainment and progress. However, this is at an early stage of implementation and is not being used consistently across all hubs. As a result, leaders do not have accurate information to analyse pupils’ progress across the provision.  The majority of subject leaders are new to post. They have carried out a number of

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

monitoring activities to assess the quality of teaching and learning in their subjects. However, due to the short amount of time they have been in post, their information about strengths and weaknesses has yet to be used to improve teaching and learning.  The new executive headteacher and the heads of school have worked hard to develop a range of policies and procedures to bring rigour and consistency across the hubs. This is beginning to have an impact across most hubs.  Leaders are honest about the quality of education, and their evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the provision is accurate. The school is led by a relatively inexperienced leadership team. However, leaders are clear about what needs to be done and have the capacity to achieve this quickly.  An appropriate range of subjects are taught across the provision. Pupils benefit from the increased support they receive in the small-class groups. Pupils are complimentary

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

about the curriculum and feel that it supports them well to catch up, filling gaps as a result of them being out of education.  Pupils show respect for, and acknowledge the differences between, various faiths and openly discuss these with each other. During the inspection, inspectors observed pupils working together on the various explanations that different religions and belief systems have to explain creation. Pupils carried this out respectfully and considered the views of others as they formed their own opinions.  The leadership and organisation of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is effective. Staff have a good understanding of pupils’ needs and every effort is made to reduce their barriers to learning. As a result, pupils have the confidence and resilience to become successful learners.  The effective promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

evident in each hub’s environment. Pupils are calm and considerate of each other and mix well together. Alongside the enrichment curriculum, assemblies contribute well to pupils’ understanding of fundamental British values.  Initially, the local authority did not respond quickly enough to issues within the provision. Several management restructures also impeded the rate of progress necessary. However, more recently, support from the local authority has improved, and now plays a pivotal role in moving the provision forward in its journey of improvement.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Historically, the management committee did not provide the necessary challenge to leaders about the impact of the school’s work on pupils’ progress. The improvements which were needed across the provision were not actioned quickly enough. As a result, the standard of education has declined.  Minutes of the management committee’s meetings demonstrate that changes in the membership of the committee are having a positive impact on the provision. Members are now providing an element of challenge to leaders and seeking external validation of leaders’ judgements. However, it is too soon to see the impact of this on pupils’ outcomes.  Members of the management committee offer a good level of expertise to the school. They are committed to ensuring that the provision improves and that pupils receive a high standard of education.  The management committee carries out its responsibilities to safeguard pupils

p.4

Governance of the school

effectively. A member has been nominated to oversee and monitor safeguarding matters. Early indications show that this is beginning to impact positively by improving the provision for pupils’ welfare.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have ensured that all safeguarding policies and procedures are fit for purpose.  The designated safeguarding lead, who is based at the Oakfield site, works effectively with other professionals, external agencies and pupils’ home schools. Excellent support is offered to the most vulnerable pupils during their time at the provision.  A range of safeguarding training for staff ensures that they are aware of their responsibilities to keep pupils safe and protect them from harm. As a result, staff are aware of the actions to take should they have any concerns about a pupil’s safety.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching and learning requires improvement because it is inconsistent across the provision. At the Oakfield, Ebbsfleet, Ashford and Southborough hubs teaching is strong and pupils enjoy their learning because it is tailored to meet their individual needs. However, at the Canterbury and Leybourne hubs, teaching and learning are weaker because not all pupils receive the educational support they require.  Not all teachers consistently use the school’s assessment information to plan lessons that precisely match pupils’ starting points. Where this is the case, pupils do not receive the necessary challenge or support to enable them to make rapid progress in their learning.  A number of staff changes, since the provision opened, has led to some pupils receiving inconsistent teaching within subjects. As a result, not all pupils have made the progress that they are capable of across the curriculum.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 There is some highly effective teaching across the provision. At the Oakfield hub, teachers’ planning is precise in meeting the needs of pupils, many of whom have gaps in their knowledge and understanding as a result of their mental health needs. The precise planning and high-quality teaching enable pupils to catch up quickly.  Teachers’ subject knowledge is strong. For example, at the Ebbsfleet hub, teachers use their knowledge to question pupils effectively, deepening pupils’ understanding and strengthening skills, particularly in mathematics.  Relationships between staff and pupils across the provision are strong. Pupils feel cared for and listened to. They are confident to answer questions and to ask for help. There is a strong nurturing culture across the hubs which enables pupils to feel safe and secure. This establishes the foundations for good learning.  Teaching assistants encourage pupils to learn and engage with their work. They are

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

highly skilled at proactively managing pupils’ behaviour. Pupils listen and respond well to their instructions. However, not all teaching assistants are consistently effective in supporting pupils’ learning.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The provision’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are happy to attend their hubs and feel safe and secure. Should pupils have concerns or worries, they are confident to speak about these with staff.  Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe while online. They were able to explain to inspectors how they apply what they have learned about this topic when using mobile phones and social media.  Pupils value the friendships they make while attending the provision. Staff support them to develop their social skills and maintain these friendships. Pupils state that bullying does not happen in the hubs.  All pupils benefit from the range of enrichment opportunities that the provision offers. Gaps in pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding are identified by staff and developed through a well-thought-out programme of activities. Consequently,

p.5

Personal development and welfare

pupils make strong gains in their understanding of the world around them.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Across all hubs, pupils’ conduct during the course of the inspection was consistently good. Records of behaviour incidents, provided by leaders, suggest that this is typical.  Pupils feel that behaviour within the hubs is good and that any potentially unkind behaviour is dealt with effectively by staff before it escalates.  Staff are successful in improving pupils’ behaviour, particularly for those pupils who have complex behavioural and/or mental health needs. Both the frequency and/or intensity of pupils’ behaviour reduces during their time at the provision.  Although pupils’ attendance is below the national average for similar provision, it is improving. A number of pupils have complex health needs which involve them being absent for prolonged periods. Leaders provide support to help them reintegrate back into their hub. Parents and carers spoken to during the inspection expressed their

p.5

Behaviour

appreciation of this.  Leaders work hard to ensure that all pupils’ attendance is good. Staff liaise regularly with pupils’ home schools and parents to ensure that pupils are safe when absent. Because of this work, there are noticeable improvements in the attendance of pupils who previously had high levels of absence.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Outcomes require improvement because leaders do not accurately know how well pupils are doing across the provision or over time.  Pupils do not make consistently good progress across the provision. The achievement of pupils within different subjects varies.  The new leadership team has created an assessment system that is effective where it is used consistently. However, it has not been fully applied by staff across the provision. Consequently, leaders do not have confidence in the accuracy of current assessment information and are unable to identify how well pupils are performing across all hubs and the tuition service.  At the Oakfield, Ebbsfleet and Ashford hubs, the assessment system is used well by staff and the information is analysed and evaluated by leaders. Teachers on these sites use this assessment information constantly to ensure that they are meeting pupils’ needs. The progress evident in pupils’ work confirms that this is the case.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ work over time shows that most pupils make progress in their learning in English and mathematics. After an initial period of transition, most pupils are starting to make the progress required to fill the gaps in their skills, knowledge and understanding within these subjects.  Pupils join the provision with significant gaps in their knowledge and understanding across a range of subjects. Their underlying health needs have resulted in them missing lengthy periods of schooling. For some pupils, their prior experience of education has often been negative. Staff successfully address pupils’ personal, social and emotional needs during their time at the provision, enabling pupils to better access learning.  The provision meets the needs of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Leaders have been quick to recognise that a number of pupils have specific needs that have not been identified by their previous schools, and have now put in place appropriate

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

support.  The provision provides tailored careers support for individual pupils across all hubs. This support builds on the knowledge that staff have about pupils’ particular needs and aspirations. Pupils are supported to make choices that will enable them to reach their goals. Because of this, when they leave the provision, most pupils go on to sustained further education, training or employment.

p.6

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The local authority

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 22 – 23 October 2014

p.8

Information about this school

 Kent Health Needs Education Service opened in September 2015. It was formed when two alternative provisions within Kent merged with the predecessor school, Oakfields.  The provision is currently operating across six hubs: Leybourne, Ebbsfleet, Ashford, Canterbury, Southborough and Oakfields. It also offers a tuition and outreach service.  The Oakfields hub provides education for 16 pupils who have been admitted to the Kent and Medway Adolescent Unit (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service Tier 4) at Woodlands House, which is a hospital treating young people with a variety of mental health conditions. The health partner is the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM).  The provision has undergone significant restructuring since it opened in 2015. There have been several changes of staff since the last inspection, including at senior leadership level. The new executive headteacher started in September 2017.

p.8

Information about this school

 The percentage of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is higher than the national average. The majority of pupils have long-term medical and/or mental health needs.  All pupils join the provision part way through their education.  Most pupils are of White British heritage.  The provision does not currently use any other alternative provision.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited all the hubs within Kent Health Needs Education Service during the inspection to observe teaching and learning. The majority of these visits were carried out jointly with senior leaders.  When visiting classrooms, inspectors observed the learning that was taking place, but focused particularly on gathering evidence about what teaching and learning are typically like. This included scrutinising the work in pupils’ books and on display, and talking with pupils about their learning.  Inspectors also took the school’s assessments of pupils’ progress into account, and considered leaders’ and external visitors’ evaluations of the quality of teaching over time.  Inspectors met formally and informally with a wide range of people to gather further evidence. This included pupils, staff, school leaders, a representative of the management committee and with the local authority’s school improvement adviser.

p.10

Information about this inspection

The lead inspector reviewed a wide range of the school’s documentation and records, including particular scrutiny of those relating to safeguarding.  Inspectors took account of the two responses to the Ofsted online survey, Parent View. Views from parents, staff and pupils were also gathered informally and formally throughout the inspection and considered alongside this evidence.

p.10

Inspection team

Emma Sanderson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Andrew Hogarth Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion