Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pietro Battista

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pietro Battista

  • Postcode verified

    HP20 1YU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlyrobustclearvery hightimelyeffectivelyimproved
Criticismconcernsinsufficientlacknot consistentlynot sufficientlydelaylimitednot promptly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings555w+52
  • What needs to improve324w−59

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
879
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 37%

Full report text

Ms Sue Imbriano Strategic Director for Children and Young People Buckinghamshire County Council County Hall Walton Street Aylesbury HP20 1YU

p.1

arrangements within Buckinghamshire County Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Buckinghamshire County Council which was conducted on 28 and 29 November 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to next year’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Buckinghamshire County Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Buckinghamshire County Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Buckinghamshire County Council children’s services

The areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in June 2009, in relation to consistently implementing service priorities and performance management, have been addressed, as have transfer arrangements between social work teams. However insufficient progress has been made in relation to improving the timeliness of assessments to ensure that children receive the services at the time they require it. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

arrangements within Buckinghamshire County Council children’s services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

following areas

ƒ Robust partnership working enables effective support to meet the needs of children through early intervention services and the appropriate use of the common assessment framework.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Thresholds for access to children’s social care services are clear across the partnership and are suitably implemented. Contacts are dealt with in a timely way and clear decisions are made by managers on the actions required.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Most assessments, seen by inspectors, were of a satisfactory standard and some were good. Children are routinely seen, alone where appropriate and their views are taken into account.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Child protection investigations are preceded by robust strategy discussion and are carried out promptly and thoroughly by suitably experienced and qualified social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Safeguarding concerns in relation to children with disabilities are suitably prioritised and assessed by specialist social workers within the children with disabilities teams.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Managers are readily accessible to staff and they provide regular advice and case direction, which staff highly value.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff have ready access to a wide range of training and personal development opportunities. In particular, newly qualified social workers and staff supported through the graduate trainee scheme to become qualified social workers receive effective additional support.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Transfer processes between the referral team and longer term teams are clear and are applied consistently, resulting in the timely transfer of cases to support vulnerable families in need.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Detailed performance management information is routinely monitored and analysed by managers to improve service delivery.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Communication and information sharing between the referral and assessment services and the out-of-hours social work service is effective.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Prompt action to tackle performance management and capability issues within the referral and assessment services has resulted in a recent, well structured, reconfiguration of the service. However, this has still to be fully embedded to demonstrate impact on the consistency of work.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The reconfiguration of referral and assessment services, together with insufficient capacity within the assessment teams has resulted in very high numbers of unallocated assessments. In some cases core assessments have not been started for a considerable length of time. Whilst these cases are regularly reviewed and reprioritised by managers, the delay in assessment results in some children not promptly receiving services they require and in other cases concerns have escalated. The council have agreed to review these unallocated assessments as a matter of priority. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Identification and communication of concerns by partner agencies in relation to domestic violence affecting children within families is prompt. However, some notifications by the Police lack sufficient detail and do not clearly identify the implications for individual children.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Some targeted audits of casework are undertaken by managers, and the findings are effectively used to enable services to be improved. A system for managers to routinely audit cases has been developed. However the impact of this work is limited because managers do not routinely undertake these audits due to lack of capacity.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Whilst the ethnic background of children and their families is routinely recorded, the diverse needs of children and their families are not consistently considered or recorded in assessments.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ In most cases seen by inspectors case recording and chronologies were not sufficiently up to date to enable a full picture of significant events to be readily understood.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Chris Williams, Chief Executive, Buckinghamshire County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion