Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Ayres

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Ayres

  • Postcode verified

    BH2 6DY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectivehigh qualitytimelystrengthclearclearly
Criticismat risknot consistentlyharmbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings621w+54
  • What needs to improve103w−50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
724
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Ms Jane Portman Executive Director, Children and Families Services Bournemouth Borough Council Bourne Avenue Bournemouth BH2 6DY

p.1

arrangements within Bournemouth Borough Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Bournemouth Borough Council which was conducted on 8 and 9 November 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to next year’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Bournemouth Borough Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Bournemouth Borough Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Bournemouth Borough Council children’s services

The areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in May 2010 have all been addressed.

p.1

arrangements within Bournemouth Borough Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Managers at all levels have a high profile within contact, referral and assessment services and provide clear and recorded direction on cases which is of high quality.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Careful attention is given to work pressures and fluctuations, case allocations Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk and staff experience. As a result workforce capacity, stability, skill and motivation are all very good. Consequently staff are able to undertake a high level of effective work with children and young people and their families.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Partnership working between children’s social care and the police is highly effective in ensuring services are timely and responsive to the needs of vulnerable children and families. Quarterly meetings of key managers from these agencies serve to promote joint safeguarding activity.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Information on individual cases is systematically used to develop a comprehensive picture of need and risk based on history and cumulative intelligence. This contributes well to the quality of assessments and care planning.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children and young people who are at risk of significant harm are appropriately identified and timely action is taken to safeguard their welfare.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Strategy meetings and core groups are appropriately convened and along with child protection conferences are well attended by partner agencies.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children and young people who are the subjects of safeguarding actions are assisted to express their views and feelings and are seen alone where appropriate.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Contact and referral processes are explicit within policies, procedures and thresholds and are clearly understood across the partnership.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Information sharing and case recording are of good quality. Assessments and plans are routinely shared with parents, children and young people. Appropriate attention is given to the diverse needs of children and families including the use of interpreters.

p.2

following areas

ƒ A range of useful audits are undertaken to assess the effectiveness of individual strategies to support children and families.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Initial and core assessments are timely, comprehensive and contain good analyses of need and risk.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff supervision is regular, recorded well and includes opportunities for case reflection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The information and recording system is effective and used well by staff.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Domestic violence cases are processed through a single point within the police and are robustly checked and prioritised for action where children and young people are involved.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The process and format for sharing the outcome of strategy meetings does not consistently ensure that the police and out-of-hours service have immediate and full access to agreed plans and contingencies such as the use of police powers.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Early help services are not fully established across the borough to support those children and families who require step down provision below the statutory children’s social care threshold.

p.3

Areas for development

The areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Pam Donnellan, Chief Executive, Bournemouth Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion