Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    TS10 1SP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedsafestrengtheffectivewell preparedconsistentlyimproving
Criticisminadequatepoorlyconcernnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings822w+24
  • What needs to improve123w−64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
942
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Ms Barbara Shaw Acting Director of Children's Services Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Adult and Children’s Services Seafield House, Kirkleatham Street Redcar Cleveland TS10 1SP

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Ofsted guidance published in April 2011 explains that the annual assessment of children’s services is derived from the performance profile of the quality of services for children and young people in each local area. This performance profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the local authority has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with other published data.

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

In reaching the assessment of children’s services, Ofsted has taken account of inspection outcomes including the arrangements for making sure children are safe and stay safe and performance against similar authorities and/or national measures. More weight has been given to the outcomes of Ofsted’s inspections and regulatory visits (Blocks A and B in the performance profile).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

The annual assessment derives from a four point scale:

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, an assessment of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, an assessment of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. As in 2010, while the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s assessment, meeting or not meeting the minimum requirements alone does not define the grade. The assessment has involved the application of inspector judgement. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 7421 6666 Direct F 020 7421 5633 Juliet.Winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Children’s services assessment Performs well (3)

Children’s services in Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council perform well. This good performance has been sustained from 2010 to 2011. The large majority of services, settings and institutions inspected by Ofsted are good or better and almost all provision helps children and young people learn well and stay safe. Areas of strength remain the same as last year and the areas identified for improvement have also not changed significantly.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs well (3)

The December 2010 unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements for children in need and children who may be in need of protection found that significant progress had been made in almost all the areas identified for development at the previous inspection in January 2010. There were no areas requiring urgent remedial action.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ For children under five, the large majority of provision in early years settings and childcare is good or outstanding. The children’s centres inspected provide effective support to children and their families. The very large majority of nurseries are good or outstanding. Children are well prepared for school and, over the past four years, outcomes in the Early Years Foundation Stage have improved steadily and match the average for similar areas. ƒ Much provision in primary schools is good or better. The first monitoring visit to the primary school in an Ofsted category of concern found that the work of the local authority has been extensive and its contribution to supporting improvement has been satisfactory. The Key Stage 2 results were not published in 2010, however, in previous years, they matched those of similar areas. Provisional results for 2011 show further improvement. ƒ The local authority secondary schools are mostly good, as they were in

p.2

Strengths

2010. The academy has not yet been inspected and was satisfactory when last inspected as a local authority school. The proportion of young people achieving five good GCSEs including English and mathematics is in line with similar local authorities and has improved year on year at a faster pace than the national rate of improvement. The provisional GCSE results for 2011 show that these standards have been maintained. Results for young people from low-income families are also improving and they do as well as young people in similar areas. The attainment gap between these young people and the majority of all young people in Redcar and Cleveland is narrowing. ƒ As in 2010, all special schools, bar one, and the special sixth forms, are good. The special school that was inadequate in 2010 is now satisfactory. ƒ The provision for learning post-16 is consistently good in the two colleges. The school sixth forms are also mostly good. Education outcomes at the

p.2

Strengths

age of 19, match similar areas at level 2 and are above at level 3. The proportion of 19-year-olds from low-income families with a level 2 or a level 3 qualification is rising and is now above the average performance of their peers in similar areas. ƒ The quality of provision for looked after children and young people remains very good. The local authority children’s home and the adoption agency are outstanding. The fostering agency is good.

p.3

Areas for further improvement

ƒ Levels of development for children from low-income families are below similar areas at the Early Years Foundation Stage. The gap between them and the majority of children in Redcar and Cleveland is not closing. ƒ The pupil referral unit is making satisfactory progress but remains inadequate. ƒ A revised strategy to reduce further the above average proportion of young people not in education, work or training is currently being implemented. It is too early to see its full impact and the current 2011 figure, provided by the local authority in its assessment, is still high.

p.3

Areas for further improvement

This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. Yours sincerely

p.3

Areas for further improvement

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Children’s Services Assessment

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion