Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    DN31 1HU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedsafestrongenjoystrengthstrengths
Criticismpoorlytoo fewbelowinconsistentnot stronggaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings773w+54
  • What needs to improve274w−64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,045
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 50
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 74%What needs to improve 26%

Full report text

Mr Jack Blackmore Interim Strategic Director, People and Communities North East Lincolnshire Council The Municipal Offices Town Hall Square Grimsby North East Lincolnshire DN31 1HU

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Ofsted guidance published in April 2011 explains that the annual assessment of children’s services is derived from the performance profile of the quality of services for children and young people in each local area. This performance profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the local authority has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with other published data.

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

In reaching the assessment of children’s services, Ofsted has taken account of inspection outcomes including the arrangements for making sure children are safe and stay safe and performance against similar authorities and/or national measures. More weight has been given to the outcomes of Ofsted’s inspections and regulatory visits (Blocks A and B in the performance profile).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

The annual assessment derives from a four point scale:

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, an assessment of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, an assessment of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. As in 2010, while the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s assessment, meeting or not meeting the minimum requirements alone does not define the grade. The assessment has involved the application of inspector judgement. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 7421 6666 Direct F 020 7421 5633 Juliet.Winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

Children’s services in North East Lincolnshire Council perform adequately. This is the same as in 2010. Specialist services make good provision for children and young people. The very large majority of all provision helps children and young people stay safe and the large majority of all provision helps them to do well and enjoy their learning. Areas of strength and for development are largely similar to last year. As in other local authorities, changes to secondary provision are taking place and some schools have become academies. Previous inspection judgements for these schools have been taken into account in making this assessment.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)

An unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements for children in need and children who may be in need of protection carried out in October 2010 found two strengths and no areas for priority action. Two of the areas for development identified at the previous unannounced inspection of front-line child protection services had not been addressed.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The quality of early years and childcare provision has improved slightly overall this year and no provision is inadequate. Two children’s centres have been inspected and both judged to be outstanding. ƒ Although not showing such strong performance as in the previous assessment, the large majority of provision in nursery and primary schools for children under the age of five is good or better. There has been a very good improvement in outcomes for children at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage. This was an area for further development in the previous assessment. The proportion of Early Years Foundation Stage children from low-income families showing a good level of development compared to their peers has also improved well and is above the national average and that of similar areas. The gap in achievement with all children in North East Lincolnshire has narrowed over the last few years. ƒ Specialist provision is mostly of good quality, as it was last year. Both of

p.2

Strengths

the local authority’s special schools are outstanding. The local fostering agency is good and the adoption agency is outstanding. Six of the nine local authority children’s homes are good; this is two more than at the time of the last assessment. ƒ There was a significant increase in the percentage of 16-year-olds gaining five or more GCSEs at A* to C including English and mathematics in 2010, and the difference between outcomes in North East Lincolnshire and the national average has reduced significantly over the last four years. Although the proportion of 16-year-olds from low-income families who achieve at this level has also increased, the rate of improvement is not as fast and the gap in achievement between these groups has widened. ƒ The recent inspection of youth offending services in the local area identified very strong outcomes in the key areas for performance.

p.2

Areas for further improvement

ƒ Only half of the local authority’s 45 primary schools are good or better, although only two are inadequate. Too few children reach the expected standards at the age of 11 and between 2007 and 2010 there was no improvement. Consequently, performance in North East Lincolnshire remains below that of similar areas and the national average at the end of Key Stage 2. Progression between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 in both English and mathematics are also below comparators. Provisional data for 2011 indicate a small improvement in test results for 11-year-olds. ƒ Although no secondary school is inadequate, only a third are good and the three secondary school sixth forms taken into account for this assessment are all only satisfactory. ƒ Despite steady improvement, the proportion of young people who gain level 2 and level 3 qualifications by the age of 19 remains below that of similar areas and the national average. The gaps in achievement between

p.3

Areas for further improvement

young people from low-income families and their peers in gaining qualifications by the age of 19 reduced last year but have not narrowed over time. ƒ Only one of the two pupil referral units is good, as one has deteriorated and is now only satisfactory. ƒ The unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements identified six areas for development, including two unaddressed issues from the previous inspection. These relate to closing contacts without sufficient evaluation of the risks and the inconsistent use of chronologies to inform current assessments.

p.3

Areas for further improvement

This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006.

p.3

Areas for further improvement

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Children’s Services Assessment

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion