Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
NR1 2DL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Most other provision for children and young people with additional or special educational needs is good or outstanding and this performance has been maintained since 2010. All of the local authority children’s homes are now good or outstanding, showing improvement since 2010, as are most of those homes commissioned by the local authority. p.2
- and those with special educational needs do slightly better than their peers in similar areas. Special schools are consistently good and six are outstanding, as are the three residential special schools. p.2
- The large majority of services, settings and institutions inspected by Ofsted are good or outstanding and most provision helps children to learn and stay safe. p.2
- All children’s centres that have been inspected for the first time this year are good or outstanding. p.2
- Slightly more primary schools than last year are now good or outstanding. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is worse than similar areas and nationally. p.3
- Less than half are now good or outstanding and two schools remain in a category of concern. p.3
- Monitoring reports state that both are making satisfactory progress with support from the local authority. Provision for young people who continue in further education or training on leaving school remains variable. p.3
- Twelve out of 21 secondary school sixth forms are good, with nine which are satisfactory. p.3
- Of the four further education colleges, three are good or outstanding, but one is now inadequate. Fewer young people achieve national qualifications by the age of 19 than p.3
- Young people from low-income families achieving higher level 3 qualifications do less well than their peers in Norfolk and elsewhere, and the attainment gap has widened. p.3
- While improvement has been consistent over time the numbers of 17-year-olds who participate in education and training remain lower than in similar areas. p.3
- This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 928
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 34, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Lisa Christensen Director of Children's Services Norfolk County Council Children’s Services County Hall, Martineau Lane Norwich, Norfolk NR1 2DL
p.1
Annual children’s services assessment
Ofsted guidance published in April 2011 explains that the annual assessment of children’s services is derived from the performance profile of the quality of services for children and young people in each local area. This performance profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the local authority has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with other published data.
p.1
Annual children’s services assessment
In reaching the assessment of children’s services, Ofsted has taken account of inspection outcomes including the arrangements for making sure children are safe and stay safe and performance against similar authorities and/or national measures. More weight has been given to the outcomes of Ofsted’s inspections and regulatory visits (Blocks A and B in the performance profile).
p.1
Annual children’s services assessment
The annual assessment derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Annual children’s services assessment
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Annual children’s services assessment
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, an assessment of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, an assessment of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. As in 2010, while the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s assessment, meeting or not meeting the minimum requirements alone does not define the grade. The assessment has involved the application of inspector judgement. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 7421 6666 Direct F 020 7421 5633 Juliet.Winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)
Children’s services in Norfolk County Council perform adequately in 2011, as in 2010. The large majority of services, settings and institutions inspected by Ofsted are good or outstanding and most provision helps children to learn and stay safe. The main strengths and key areas for development remain similar to last year. Progress is being made in nearly all areas but not significantly so, nor fast enough. In this academic year five secondary schools and two primary schools have gained academy status since last year and these inspection judgements have been taken into account in this year’s assessment.
p.2
Children’s services assessment Performs adequately (2)
In 2011 a full inspection of safeguarding and services for looked after children judged both as adequate, with adequate capacity to improve. Core requirements for safeguarding are being met but for looked after children, outcomes for health and economic well-being are inadequate.
p.2
Strengths
Early years and childcare provision is good in the large majority of settings. All children’s centres that have been inspected for the first time this year are good or outstanding. Achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage is in line with similar areas and nationally and satisfactory progress has been made since 2009. In 2011, provisional results in the national tests for 11-year-olds show marginal improvement and girls continue to achieve better than boys. In 2010 children achieved well below those in similar areas and nationally. Slightly more primary schools than last year are now good or outstanding. At age 16, standards for young people achieving at least five A* to C grades at GCSE, including English and mathematics, are in line with similar areas and nationally and the rate of improvement has been gradual but steady for four years. At this age, young people from low-income families
p.2
Strengths
and those with special educational needs do slightly better than their peers in similar areas. Special schools are consistently good and six are outstanding, as are the three residential special schools. Most other provision for children and young people with additional or special educational needs is good or outstanding and this performance has been maintained since 2010. All of the local authority children’s homes are now good or outstanding, showing improvement since 2010, as are most of those homes commissioned by the local authority. However two are inadequate. Local authority fostering arrangements are good and the local adoption agency is outstanding.
p.2
Areas for further improvement
Although showing some improvement from last year, a lower proportion of children, including those from low-income families, achieve a good level of development in the Early Years Foundation Stage than elsewhere. More secondary schools are now satisfactory, showing a decline in good and outstanding performance since last year. This is worse than similar areas and nationally. Less than half are now good or outstanding and two schools remain in a category of concern. Monitoring reports state that both are making satisfactory progress with support from the local authority. Provision for young people who continue in further education or training on leaving school remains variable. Twelve out of 21 secondary school sixth forms are good, with nine which are satisfactory. Of the four further education colleges, three are good or outstanding, but one is now inadequate. Fewer young people achieve national qualifications by the age of 19 than
p.3
Areas for further improvement
elsewhere and this has not improved significantly since last year. Young people from low-income families achieving higher level 3 qualifications do less well than their peers in Norfolk and elsewhere, and the attainment gap has widened. While improvement has been consistent over time the numbers of 17-year-olds who participate in education and training remain lower than in similar areas.
p.3
Areas for further improvement
This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006.
p.3
Areas for further improvement
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Children’s Services Assessment
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion