Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    BN7 1SG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedsafestrength
Criticisminadequatepoorlylowbelowgapsnot improvedslowly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings733w+20
  • What needs to improve284w−29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,016
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 50
Average sentence
27 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 28%

Full report text

Mr Matt Dunkley Director of Children's Services East Sussex County Council PO Box 4, County Hall St Anne's Crescent Lewes East Sussex BN7 1SG

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Ofsted guidance published in April 2011 explains that the annual assessment of children’s services is derived from the performance profile of the quality of services for children and young people in each local area. This performance profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the local authority has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with other published data.

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

In reaching the assessment of children’s services, Ofsted has taken account of inspection outcomes including the arrangements for making sure children are safe and stay safe and performance against similar authorities and/or national measures. More weight has been given to the outcomes of Ofsted’s inspections and regulatory visits (Blocks A and B in the performance profile).

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

The annual assessment derives from a four point scale:

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements

p.1

Annual children’s services assessment

Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, an assessment of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, an assessment of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. As in 2010, while the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s assessment, meeting or not meeting the minimum requirements alone does not define the grade. The assessment has involved the application of inspector judgement. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 7421 6666 Direct F 020 7421 5633 Juliet.Winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Children’s services assessment Performs well (3)

Children’s services in East Sussex County Council perform well. This performance has been sustained from 2010 to 2011. As found elsewhere, changes to secondary provision are taking place and one school is now a sponsored academy. The previous inspection judgement for this school has been taken into account in this assessment. The very large majority of services, settings and institutions inspected by Ofsted are good or better overall and provision helps children and young people learn and stay safe. Areas of strength remain the same as last year and more provision is now good or outstanding. Progress has been made in the key areas for development in 2010, but the educational attainment of children and young people from low-income families has not shown the same improvement at the age of five, and for some 19- year-olds, as it has for 16-year-olds.

p.2

Children’s services assessment Performs well (3)

A recent announced full inspection of safeguarding and services for looked after children reported that safeguarding arrangements are good as is provision for looked after children. The local authority’s capacity to improve safeguarding services is good and outstanding for services for looked after children.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The large majority of early years and childcare settings are good or better although improvement since the last assessment has been modest. The five children’s centres inspected are judged as good. ƒ For children under five, provision in nurseries and primary schools has improved and the very large majority are now good or better. ƒ The overall effectiveness of secondary schools has improved with the large majority now good or better. The number of 16-year-olds achieving five good GCSEs including English and mathematics improved significantly last year and are in line with similar areas. Attainment for young people from families with low incomes also improved well and these young people are catching up with their peers in the county. ƒ The majority of provision for young people aged 16 and over is good or better and shows improvement from last year. Two of the three general further education colleges are now good as is the sixth form college. Five

p.2

Strengths

of the eight secondary school sixth forms are good or better but three are only satisfactory. ƒ For children and young people requiring specialist provision, the very large majority is good or better. Local authority special schools show substantial improvement and the large majority are now good or better, although one is still inadequate. ƒ Local authority fostering and adoption services are good or better, as are five out of six local authority children’s homes and all children’s homes that are independently run.

p.2

Areas for further improvement

ƒ Slightly more childcare is outstanding, but there has been no improvement in the proportion of registered childminder settings judged good or better since the last assessment. Although there has been some improvement in primary schools and the large majority are now good or better, more are inadequate and a third of schools are no better than satisfactory. ƒ Very young children’s level of development at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage is in line with national and similar area averages, but improved marginally in 2010 and has not improved overall since 2008. Although the achievements of young children from families with low incomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage reflect the average for similar areas, these children are not catching up with their peers in the county. Results of national tests for 11-year-olds have improved less than elsewhere in recent years but in 2010 they remained

p.3

Areas for further improvement

in line with the averages for both the country overall and similar areas. Provisional results for 11-year-olds in 2011 are below national figures. ƒ The number of young people achieving level 2 or equivalent qualifications or higher level qualifications by the age of 19 in East Sussex remain well below the averages for similar areas although in line with the country overall. Young people from families with low incomes also do less well than the same young people nationally in the extent to which they gain higher level qualifications although standards did improve in 2010 and attainment gaps with others in the county are closing, albeit slowly.

p.3

Areas for further improvement

This children’s services assessment is provided in accordance with section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006.

p.3

Areas for further improvement

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Children’s Services Assessment

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion