Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Derek Churchman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Derek Churchman

  • Postcode verified

    BS1 5TR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+19Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlytimelyclearstrengthrobustpromptlyimproving
Criticismnot alwaysat riskseriousinsufficientinconsistentlydelay

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings694w+52
  • What needs to improve207w−53

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
901
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%What needs to improve 23%

Full report text

Ms Annie Hudson Director of Children and Young People's Services Bristol City Council 3rd Floor Council House College Green Bristol BS1 5TR

p.1

arrangements within Bristol City Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Bristol City Council which was conducted on 6 and 7 September 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Bristol City Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Bristol City Council children’s services

The inspection identified an area of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Bristol City Council children’s services

Two of the areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in September 2009 have been met, however work is still in progress to ensure timely transfer of cases, to inform referrers of the outcome of referrals and improve performance in relation to assessments in child protection cases. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

arrangements within Bristol City Council children’s services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ A robust approach to recruitment and retention has resulted in a very stable and experienced social work workforce in the assessment teams. Most of these workers possess, or are pursuing post qualifying awards. Additional posts in the Assessment Service, secured since the last unannounced inspection, have resulted in more manageable social work caseloads.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Contact and referral arrangements are timely and effective with good managerial oversight. Policies and procedures comply with statutory guidance and are regularly updated. Thresholds are consistently applied.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Child protection investigations are carried out promptly by qualified social workers. Effective joint working between the police and duty teams results in timely decision making about children at risk.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children and parents are seen and their views are considered in assessments contributing to effective care planning.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The quality of initial assessments seen by inspectors was satisfactory or good. Stronger assessments included detailed analysis of historical information, risk and protective factors.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Ethnicity is appropriately and consistently recorded in all assessments, although the impact is not always sufficiently analysed to inform the assessment of individual and family needs.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Management support and supervision is readily accessible and highly regarded by staff. Clear management direction is evidenced in case records. Opportunities for reflective practice are provided but not always recorded.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Clear and effective communication between the emergency duty team and daytime service ensures children are appropriately safeguarded. The emergency duty team has been subject to a recent review and additional social work staff with relevant childcare experience are contributing to an improving response outside office hours.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The common assessment framework (CAF) is well established and effective links between the assessment teams and the Area CAF panels enable vulnerable children and families, who do not meet the threshold for statutory services, to obtain effective support.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Appropriate performance management systems are in place. Managers at all levels utilise data, resulting in prompt responses to trends across the council.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Case file and thematic audits are routinely undertaken by managers at all levels and are used to inform individual practice and service development. This was an area for development at the last unannounced inspection.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Case records and chronologies are up to date, enabling a clear picture to be obtained of significant events and case management.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Staff have good access to training and development opportunities and learning from serious case reviews is disseminated in a timely and effective way.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Social work teams complete section 47 assessments and child protection conference reports in preference to full core assessments, leading to insufficient assessment of need and care planning. For example, the needs of individual children within families are not always separately assessed. The use of core assessments was an area for development at the last unannounced inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ There are significant variations between offices in the time taken to transfer cases to longer term teams. In some offices this is leading to delay in implementing case plans and increased workload pressures for some assessment teams. This was an area for development at the last unannounced inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The arrangements for informing referrers of the outcome of their referrals are applied inconsistently between offices. This was an area for development at the last unannounced inspection. While senior managers are monitoring the effectiveness of new systems and mechanisms that have been introduced since that last inspection, further action is required to ensure referrers are appropriately and consistently informed of the outcome of their referrals.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Jan Ormondroyd, Chief Executive, Bristol City Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion