Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colette Elliott-Cooper

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colette Elliott-Cooper

  • Postcode verified

    SE6 4RU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh qualitytimelystronglystrengthscleareffectivelypromptly
Criticismseriousbelowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings604w+56
  • What needs to improve61w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
665
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Ms Frankie Sulke Executive Director Laurence House Catford Road Catford London SE6 4RU

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Lewisham Council which was conducted on 2 and 3 March 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but one area for development, which is detailed below.

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

ƒ Appropriate decisions about incoming contacts and referrals are made in accordance with statutory timescales.

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

ƒ Most initial and core assessments are of high quality and lead to appropriate planning for children and young people. Their timeliness is above the national average. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Most child protection (Section 47) enquiries are thorough and timely and are always carried out by a qualified social worker.

p.1

Lewisham children’s services

ƒ Senior managers have good oversight of front line decision making and take decisions as required about complex family situations.

p.2

Lewisham children’s services

ƒ Regular and well established random audits of case files enable senior managers to oversee and improve the quality of the duty and assessment service.

p.2

Lewisham children’s services

ƒ Consideration of equality and diversity issues is strongly reflected in casework practice and planning. Effective specialist support services are provided to meet the needs of the diverse population.

p.2

Lewisham children’s services

ƒ Social workers have good access to regular supervision and value the professional advice and support provided by line managers.

p.2

Lewisham children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and area for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Inter-agency policies and procedures are good and accessible to staff . Thresholds are clear and are effectively applied with timely referrals of individual children from partner agencies, ensuring vulnerable children are promptly identified and supported.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The out of hours service is effective, well resourced and well co-ordinated with daytime services.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The common assessment framework is well established. Multi-agency working through this framework supports children and young people well.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Assessments engage children, young people and parents well and result in clear planning and provision of support.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good training and development opportunities are promoted and well regarded by social workers. This has included recent learning from serious case reviews.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Children and young people have good access to a wide range of specialist voluntary sector provision.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The council has responded well to an identified need by developing a missing person’s service; this ensures that vulnerable children and young people who have absconded from foster placements, residential or families are offered timely and appropriate support on their return. ƒ A good recruitment and retention policy has resulted in very low numbers of agency staff in the referral and assessment service.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Families are informed, orally of the outcomes of assessments, but they do not routinely receive written copies and are therefore not able to check the accuracy of information.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Barry Quirk, Chief Executive, London Borough of Lewisham Marion Saunders, Chair of Lewisham Safeguarding Children Board Robert Massey, Lead Member for Children’s Services Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion