Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Neil Penswick

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Neil Penswick

  • Postcode verified

    HU17 9BA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearconsistentstrengthsimprovedpromptlyenthusiasticclearly
Criticismnot consistentlyat risklacknot alwaysharmnot clearnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings620w+39
  • What needs to improve305w−65

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
921
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 33%

Full report text

Ms Alison Michalska Director of Children, Family and Adult Services East Riding of Yorkshire Council County Hall Cross Street Beverley HU17 9BA

p.1

children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in East Riding of Yorkshire Council which was conducted on 5 and 6 January 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

children’s services

ƒ Effective action is taken to ensure that children at risk of immediate harm are safeguarded.

p.1

children’s services

ƒ The social work practice seen by inspectors was adequate with some good features. Social workers engaged well with families and demonstrated an appropriate understanding of legislation and guidance. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Work undertaken by social workers was child-centred. Children and young people were seen and involved in the work undertaken.

p.1

children’s services

ƒ Ethnic, cultural and language issues are appropriately considered and examples were seen of good consideration of communication and liaison issues with Portuguese and Polish migrant families.

p.2

children’s services

ƒ Partner agencies were routinely consulted when assessments were undertaken and their information included within the assessment, ensuring that relevant information on children and young people was considered.

p.2

children’s services

ƒ Clear systems are in place to enable information and work to be passed between the day time and the out of hours service, enabling a consistent approach for children and families.

p.2

children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Senior managers have reviewed duty, contact and assessment services, including the emergency duty team, and implemented change. Further change is underway aimed at delivering an improved and consistent response across the unitary authority. Additional staff have been appointed to respond to increasing demands for services.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ New authority-wide arrangements for a single point of contact for children and family services provide a clarity and consistency of response. Contacts are dealt with promptly and recording is clear and well written . There is professional back-up to assist the customer services’ staff and comprehensive training and systems are in place.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ There is an immediate response by social work teams on work received from the Customer Services Centre and good management oversight; this enables visits to be undertaken on the day of referral with the police where necessary.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Morale is good. Committed and enthusiastic duty staff report good access to training and regular supervision. Caseloads are reasonable; newly qualified staff receive good induction and support arrangements are good.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good multi-agency partnership arrangements, communication and planning are evident. There is close liaison with the police ensuring children are protected. Child protection planning meetings, with multi-agency involvement, occur appropriately and are well recorded with clearly outlined decisions.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ National guidance is not consistently followed on when to initiate assessments to identify a child and family’s needs. Examples were seen of where the response was to a presenting problem alone rather than as a result of thorough consideration of underlying issues.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Thresholds for children in need and child protection work are not clear. However, currently all referrals are responded to promptly and therefore no children were identified as at immediate risk. Lack of clarity on thresholds has been identified by the East Riding Safeguarding Children Board and work is being undertaken to deal with this.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The local authority Integrated Children’s System requires significant and lengthy input from workers to produce long documents which do not assist social workers in identifying children’s needs and are therefore not consistently fully completed. Printed versions of documents are different to the electronic record and do not provide a record of all information gathered, analysis and decisions.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Managerial decisions are not always clearly recorded. Staff and managers have developed alternative methods of recording essential information. However, this detracts from the effectiveness of quality assurance arrangements to assess the quality and consistency of the work undertaken across the local authority. Senior managers are aware of these problems and have commissioned further work to ensure the immediate issues are resolved.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Recent local authority data show a deterioration in performance, both on the percentage of assessments completed and those completed within national timescales. The new arrangements for contact, referral and assessment work have not yet had opportunity to impact on the current performance data.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Nigel Pearson, Chief Executive, East Riding of Yorkshire Council Bron Sanders, Independent Chair, East Riding Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Penny Peacock, Portfolio Holder for Children, Young People and Schools, East Riding of Yorkshire Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion