Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Neil Penswick
- Postcode verified
HU17 9BA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Examples were seen of where the response was to a presenting problem alone rather than as a result of thorough consideration of underlying issues. p.3
- However, currently all referrals are responded to promptly and therefore no children were identified as at immediate risk. p.3
- Lack of clarity on thresholds has been identified by the East Riding Safeguarding Children Board and work is being undertaken to deal with this. p.3
- Printed versions of documents are different to the electronic record and do not provide a record of all information gathered, analysis and decisions. p.3
- Staff and managers have developed alternative methods of recording essential information. p.3
- However, this detracts from the effectiveness of quality assurance arrangements to assess the quality and consistency of the work undertaken across the local authority. p.3
- Senior managers are aware of these problems and have commissioned further work to ensure the immediate issues are resolved. p.3
- The new arrangements for contact, referral and assessment work have not yet had opportunity to impact on the current performance data. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 921
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Alison Michalska Director of Children, Family and Adult Services East Riding of Yorkshire Council County Hall Cross Street Beverley HU17 9BA
p.1
children’s services
This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in East Riding of Yorkshire Council which was conducted on 5 and 6 January 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.
p.1
children’s services
The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.
p.1
children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.
p.1
children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:
p.1
children’s services
Effective action is taken to ensure that children at risk of immediate harm are safeguarded.
p.1
children’s services
The social work practice seen by inspectors was adequate with some good features. Social workers engaged well with families and demonstrated an appropriate understanding of legislation and guidance. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk Work undertaken by social workers was child-centred. Children and young people were seen and involved in the work undertaken.
p.1
children’s services
Ethnic, cultural and language issues are appropriately considered and examples were seen of good consideration of communication and liaison issues with Portuguese and Polish migrant families.
p.2
children’s services
Partner agencies were routinely consulted when assessments were undertaken and their information included within the assessment, ensuring that relevant information on children and young people was considered.
p.2
children’s services
Clear systems are in place to enable information and work to be passed between the day time and the out of hours service, enabling a consistent approach for children and families.
p.2
children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:
p.2
Strengths
Senior managers have reviewed duty, contact and assessment services, including the emergency duty team, and implemented change. Further change is underway aimed at delivering an improved and consistent response across the unitary authority. Additional staff have been appointed to respond to increasing demands for services.
p.2
Strengths
New authority-wide arrangements for a single point of contact for children and family services provide a clarity and consistency of response. Contacts are dealt with promptly and recording is clear and well written . There is professional back-up to assist the customer services’ staff and comprehensive training and systems are in place.
p.2
Strengths
There is an immediate response by social work teams on work received from the Customer Services Centre and good management oversight; this enables visits to be undertaken on the day of referral with the police where necessary.
p.2
Strengths
Morale is good. Committed and enthusiastic duty staff report good access to training and regular supervision. Caseloads are reasonable; newly qualified staff receive good induction and support arrangements are good.
p.2
Strengths
Good multi-agency partnership arrangements, communication and planning are evident. There is close liaison with the police ensuring children are protected. Child protection planning meetings, with multi-agency involvement, occur appropriately and are well recorded with clearly outlined decisions.
p.2
Areas for development
National guidance is not consistently followed on when to initiate assessments to identify a child and family’s needs. Examples were seen of where the response was to a presenting problem alone rather than as a result of thorough consideration of underlying issues.
p.3
Areas for development
Thresholds for children in need and child protection work are not clear. However, currently all referrals are responded to promptly and therefore no children were identified as at immediate risk. Lack of clarity on thresholds has been identified by the East Riding Safeguarding Children Board and work is being undertaken to deal with this.
p.3
Areas for development
The local authority Integrated Children’s System requires significant and lengthy input from workers to produce long documents which do not assist social workers in identifying children’s needs and are therefore not consistently fully completed. Printed versions of documents are different to the electronic record and do not provide a record of all information gathered, analysis and decisions.
p.3
Areas for development
Managerial decisions are not always clearly recorded. Staff and managers have developed alternative methods of recording essential information. However, this detracts from the effectiveness of quality assurance arrangements to assess the quality and consistency of the work undertaken across the local authority. Senior managers are aware of these problems and have commissioned further work to ensure the immediate issues are resolved.
p.3
Areas for development
Recent local authority data show a deterioration in performance, both on the percentage of assessments completed and those completed within national timescales. The new arrangements for contact, referral and assessment work have not yet had opportunity to impact on the current performance data.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Nigel Pearson, Chief Executive, East Riding of Yorkshire Council Bron Sanders, Independent Chair, East Riding Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Penny Peacock, Portfolio Holder for Children, Young People and Schools, East Riding of Yorkshire Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion