Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sheena Doyle

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sheena Doyle

  • Postcode verified

    L36 5YH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiverobusttimelyclearstrengtheffectivelypromptlyeffective
Criticisminconsistentunclearabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings789w+87
  • What needs to improve114w−56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
903
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 24, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 13%

Full report text

Mr Damian Allen Executive Director, Children and Family Services Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council Huyton Hey Road Huyton Merseyside L36 5YH

p.1

services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 12 and 13 April 2011. The inspection was carried out under Section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

services

The areas of development and the area of priority action identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements on 28 and 29 July 2009 have been addressed.

p.1

services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Robust audit of cases is applied systematically by managers to support Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk continuous improvement in the quality of service delivery to children and families. The Quality Assurance Unit provides additional independent oversight of cases to ensure that audit findings are applied effectively. The audit arrangements have had a high impact on improvement such as in relation to the timeliness and quality of assessments.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The central contact service provides a highly effective system to ensure timely responses to individual and agency referrals. Good oversight of referral activity by social work qualified managers is supported by the electronic customer service management system. Early evidence from routine surveys undertaken by customer services advisers confirms high levels of customer satisfaction. All customer service advisors receive appropriate training, which includes safeguarding training, in order to ensure that good quality information is gathered at the point of contact. They have easy access to consultation from a co-located qualified social worker and team manager.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff have easy access to up to date procedures and policies which are maintained electronically. This supports good practice which complies with statutory guidance.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Most initial and core assessments are completed in a timely fashion. The quality of assessments is good and they show evidence that the views of the subject children and their families are included and considered. Explicit consideration is given to children’s individual needs.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Management decision making is timely for referrals, assessments and activity to safeguard children. Children are seen and assessed promptly by qualified social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff supervision files and case records demonstrate clear evidence of effective management oversight.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The co-location of two common assessment framework (CAF) workers alongside duty social workers promotes the use of the CAF and helps to reduce inappropriate referrals to children’s social care. Early identification of additional need is promoted well through targeting training for staff from private nurseries and childminders.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Easy access by the children’s duty service to designated health and education professionals ensures timely advice on individual cases and demonstrates good multi-agency working.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Core assessments are routinely supported by multi-disciplinary meetings which are convened at the earliest opportunity to enable swift professional information sharing and improve the thoroughness of assessments. ƒ Strategy meetings are well attended by other agencies in addition to children’s social care and police staff. The agreements made in relation to the roles and responsibilities of those attending the meeting are supported by contemporaneous recording with the decisions being signed by all parties and promptly distributed.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Case recording is generally up to date and social workers report good access to administrative support.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Out of hours duty arrangements are clear, robust and there are good arrangements for the handover of information to the day service.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Staff, including agency staff, report that their caseloads are manageable and that they have access to regular supervision and training opportunities. Staff are suitably qualified and experienced for their roles.

p.3

following areas

ƒ New qualified social workers receive good support through the newly qualified social worker programme. The benefits of the programme include protected caseloads, fortnightly supervision, personal mentors and a schedule of ‘master classes’ designed to promote good practice.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ In some cases seen by inspectors, the decision making process underpinning the timing and frequency of strategy meetings and subsequent Section 47 enquiries is unclear. The council is aware of this and will review procedures and the electronic case recording system to ensure that improvements are made.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The absence of a clear policy and procedure for obtaining written consent from children and their families to the sharing of information with other agencies leads to inconsistent practice.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Sheena Ramsey, Chief Executive, Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion