Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Geoff Corre

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Geoff Corre

  • Postcode verified

    CM1 1QH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−15Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelytimelywell supported
Criticismrisk of harmat risklacknot alwaysnot consistentlyharmyet totoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings528w+31
  • What needs to improve120w−77

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
648
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 25, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 19%

Full report text

Mr Dave Hill Executive Director Children, Families and Schools Essex County Council County Hall Chelmsford Essex CM1 1QH

p.1

arrangements within Essex County Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Essex County Council which was conducted on 16 and 17 March 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Essex County Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Essex County Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of practice that met requirements with some areas for development. The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in October 2009 have been addressed.

p.1

arrangements within Essex County Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

following areas

ƒ Agreed thresholds of need and intervention are applied effectively by a majority of partner agencies resulting in most referrals to social care being Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

following areas

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk appropriate.

p.1

following areas

ƒ The council has undertaken a detailed self-evaluation and this has led to a good appreciation of its progress and areas for improvement that were identified in the safeguarding and looked after inspection. Quality audits and a safeguarding improvement project have assisted staff to raise standards from a low base and have resulted in improvements in the quality of services delivered to children and families.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The establishment of the initial referral team is effective in providing timely and appropriate responses to contacts and referrals and in ensuring that all cases are allocated.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Referral and assessment practice and procedures effectively manage risk of harm.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children at risk of immediate harm are protected by Section 47 enquiries which are timely, undertaken by suitably qualified and experienced social workers and supported by effective management decisions.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments demonstrate that social workers take suitable account of a wide range of children’s and families’ diverse cultural and individual needs so as to ensure the delivery of suitable services.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Record keeping is up-to-date and reflects purposeful intervention, timely and sound decision making and effective planning.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Out-of-hours arrangements for receiving and responding to referrals are effective and suitable links to daytime services are in place resulting in effective communication.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Social work staff report that they are well supported by managers and value the council’s appraisal scheme and management supervision which enable them to improve their practice.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Social workers report that caseloads are manageable resulting in families receiving a timely and appropriate level of service.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ While multi-agency allocation groups have been recently established, use of the common assessment framework is not fully embedded. Early intervention services are at an early stage of development and have yet to show impact.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Too many assessments lack sufficient analysis and this results in recommendations that are not suitably based on clear evidence.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The impact of children’s views on the analysis of core assessments is not always evident, and parents and carers are not consistently provided with a copy of the assessment.

p.2

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Joanna Killian, Chief Executive, Essex County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion