Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Ralph Trevelyan-Butler
- Postcode verified
CW11 1HZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The local authority is aware of this and is working with partner agencies to develop its use. p.3
- This is recognised as an area for improvement by the local authority who have recently introduced increased management monitoring and oversight. p.3
- However the recent increase in management capacity to improve oversight has yet to ensure that all assessments are of a sufficiently good quality. p.3
- This was an area for development at the previous inspection. p.3
- The local authority has recognised this and has put in place improved auditing and training but this has yet to have an impact. p.3
- However there are still weaknesses in the system and it does not provide managers with easily accessible performance management information. p.3
- Areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Erica Wenzel, Chief Executive, Cheshire East Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“This minimises disruption and delays for children and families.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,024
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Lorraine Butcher Head of Service for Children and Families Cheshire East Council Westfields Middlewich Road Sandbach CW11 1HZ
p.1
arrangements within Cheshire East Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Cheshire East Council which was conducted on 5 and 6 April 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Cheshire East Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Cheshire East Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Cheshire East Council children’s services
The council has acted swiftly to modernise services following its creation in 2009 as part of the local government reorganisation. Despite improvements there remain issues about the variability of practice and effective management oversight. The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in July 2010 have been addressed by the council through an action plan. There have been some improvements in most of the identified areas however in others arrangements are too recent to have sufficient impact. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Cheshire East Council children’s services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
following areas
Following the last inspection the council has identified the need to co-locate teams undertaking contact, referral and assessment functions. Although this realignment of services is too recent to have much impact the unified management structure combined with increased capacity provides a strong platform to deliver improvements.
p.2
following areas
Partnership working with the police is good. As a result there has been a significant improvement in the appropriateness and quality of referrals from the police ensuring both agencies focus their resources on the most vulnerable children.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds regarding child protection are well understood by partner agencies. This ensures that concerns are referred and acted upon promptly.
p.2
following areas
Improved management of child protection investigations ensures that initial child protection conferences are held promptly. This ensures good multi-agency involvement in planning to meet children’s needs in a timely manner.
p.2
following areas
The emergency out of hours team is effective in investigating child protection concerns. Referrals to daytime services are timely and contain the relevant information.
p.2
following areas
There are clear arrangements to co-work child protection cases with the children’s disability team where appropriate. This ensures that vulnerable children are protected.
p.2
following areas
The recording of equality and diversity in assessments is consistent and examples of good consideration of cultural needs were seen.
p.2
following areas
There are clear arrangements in place for the transfer of work to longer term teams supported by weekly meetings. This minimises disruption and delays for children and families.
p.2
following areas
The Cheshire East Safeguarding Children Board has a good focus on performance in the updated business plan which holds agencies to account in achieving improvements to services for children.
p.2
following areas
Training programmes reflect the priorities identified at the last inspection and include supervision and quality assurance for managers and the ‘back to basics’ course for social workers. There is good dissemination of findings from serious case reviews.
p.2
following areas
Progress to reduce social work caseloads is good and these are now generally manageable.
p.2
following areas
Supervision practice and recording are adequate and social workers report they are well supported by approachable managers. Social workers are positive about the recent reorganisation of services and increased management support.
p.3
following areas
The resourcing of administrative support in the teams is good. This enables social workers to spend more time on direct work with families.
p.3
Areas for development
The common assessment framework is yet to be embedded with a lack of consistent understanding of thresholds and purpose. The local authority is aware of this and is working with partner agencies to develop its use.
p.3
Areas for development
The effectiveness of the contact and referral service is compromised by delays in processing of initial contacts and a lack of clarity on the requirements to gather information. This is recognised as an area for improvement by the local authority who have recently introduced increased management monitoring and oversight.
p.3
Areas for development
All core assessments seen considered risk and protective factors and there were examples of good analysis. However the recent increase in management capacity to improve oversight has yet to ensure that all assessments are of a sufficiently good quality. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
Measures to monitor and manage initial and core assessments are now in place, but have only recently been introduced and are yet to have an impact. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The quality of recording of strategy discussions and child protection enquiries remains variable. The local authority has recognised this and has put in place improved auditing and training but this has yet to have an impact. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The council has introduced a structured programme to systematically audit the quality of assessments, planning and recording although this has yet to have an impact. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
Improvements to the council’s electronic system have been introduced and further upgrades are scheduled. However there are still weaknesses in the system and it does not provide managers with easily accessible performance management information. This was an area for development at the previous inspection. Areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Erica Wenzel, Chief Executive, Cheshire East Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion