Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Emmy Tomsett
- Postcode verified
EX2 4QD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some lack sufficient analysis and are not consistently clear in highlighting risk and protective factors. p.3
- In a few cases seen by inspectors assessments are over-optimistic and there is too much reliance on the capacity of parents to adequately protect their children from harm. p.3
- This has the potential to leave children and young people at risk. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children in your area. p.3
- Copy: Phil Norrey, Chief Executive, Devon County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 826
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 29, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Jennie Stephens Strategic Director People Devon County Council County Hall Topsham Rd Exeter EX2 4QD
p.1
arrangements within Devon County Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Devon County Council which was conducted on 15 and 16 June 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Devon County Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Devon County Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Devon County Council children’s services
The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in July 2010 have been addressed.
p.1
arrangements within Devon County Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
The Advanced Professional Tier 2 team provides a good preventative service for cases that do not meet the threshold for ongoing social care intervention. This is leading to positive outcomes for children and their families and reducing the level of repeat referrals. Team representatives also attend Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
Strengths
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk common assessment framework (CAF) meetings and provide good oversight and support on selected cases.
p.1
Strengths
The Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub continues to provide a high quality and comprehensive referral service for use by the local authority assessment teams.
p.2
following areas
Decisions about contact and referrals are made in accordance with statutory timescales.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for multi-agency prevention and early intervention services are well established and consistently applied. Partnership working between children’s services and the voluntary and community sector is enabling support and service provision for children and young people.
p.2
following areas
The council has been successful in reducing caseloads to more manageable levels. A reorganisation of teams has strengthened the arrangements for the prompt transfer of cases.
p.2
following areas
Most children are seen alone and their wishes and feelings form an integral part of individual assessments and planning.
p.2
following areas
The high volume of domestic abuse referrals is managed effectively. Past referral history is appropriately taken into account to inform assessment decisions.
p.2
following areas
Child protection enquiries are appropriately prioritised and always carried out by a qualified social worker.
p.2
following areas
Social workers are well supported by their managers and are positive about training opportunities that are made available to them. Newly qualified social workers have protected caseloads and are appropriately supported.
p.2
following areas
The council has a comprehensive audit programme from which data is derived to help inform service planning. Management peer reviews have also been introduced leading to improvements in service provision, for example, increased preventative services.
p.2
following areas
Links between the emergency duty team and locality teams are well established and information is shared promptly and effectively.
p.2
following areas
The use of CAF is embedded with a significant increase in its use in recent months.
p.2
following areas
There is a good consideration of identity, ethnicity and cultural issues in assessment and care planning post referral.
p.2
Areas for development
Initial and core assessments are of too variable quality. Some lack sufficient analysis and are not consistently clear in highlighting risk and protective factors. In a few cases seen by inspectors assessments are over-optimistic and there is too much reliance on the capacity of parents to adequately protect their children from harm.
p.3
Areas for development
Some cases are closed prematurely and before all the necessary work has been completed. This has the potential to leave children and young people at risk.
p.3
Areas for development
Core assessments are started in the assessment team but are transferred before the full assessment is completed which increases the potential for unnecessary replication of work and delay in the provision of services to children and young people.
p.3
Areas for development
Some case recording is not always up to date making it difficult for managers to ascertain whether children have been seen and if appropriate safeguarding action, including investigation, has been taken.
p.3
Areas for development
Referral documentation does not routinely collect information about the child’s religion or first language.
p.3
Areas for development
Although supervision of staff is carried out regularly and in accordance with the council’s supervision policy the records do not consistently indicate that supervision is sufficiently challenging or reflective.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children in your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Phil Norrey, Chief Executive, Devon County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion