Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lolly Rascagneres

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lolly Rascagneres

  • Postcode verified

    RG12 1AQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh qualitystrongstrengthpositiverobusttimelypromptly
Criticismnot alwaysat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings850w+56
  • What needs to improve81w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
931
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Dr Janette Karklins Director for Children, Young People and Learning Bracknell Forest Borough Council Easthampstead House Town Square Bracknell Berkshire RG12 1AQ

p.1

arrangements within Bracknell Forest Borough Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Bracknell Forest Borough Council which was conducted on 14 and 15 June 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Bracknell Forest Borough Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers and social workers.

p.1

arrangements within Bracknell Forest Borough Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with an area for development.

p.1

arrangements within Bracknell Forest Borough Council children’s services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in August 2010 have been fully addressed.

p.1

arrangements within Bracknell Forest Borough Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ There is a strong focus and commitment by the council to support staff through a wide range of relevant high quality training and development. This is a positive initiative which has led to a stable and highly motivated Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk workforce.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The council has responded well to the views of children, young people and parents about the service, through post assessment questionnaires and surveys. This has led to a number of improvements including clearer information being provided to children and young people about the service.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Where children and young people are identified as being at risk, appropriate and prompt action is taken to safeguard them. Investigations are timely and are always carried out by qualified social workers. Strategy discussions are prompt, comprehensive and include relevant agencies.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children with disabilities, who are in need of protection, are provided with an effective service. Their needs are holistically assessed which results in good plans that meet both their safeguarding and welfare needs.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The quality of initial and core assessments is generally satisfactory, with some of high quality, using relevant research to underpin judgements and plans. Initial assessments are undertaken by suitably qualified social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Contact and referrals are responded to promptly. Cases are allocated without delay for assessment, ensuring vulnerable children and young people are identified and supported. Managers ensure consistency and clarity in the recording of contacts and referrals.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children and young people are involved in their assessments and routinely seen alone with good evidence that their views and wishes are appropriately taken into account in case planning and decision making. This was an area of development identified at the last inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Practice is sensitive to the ethnic, linguistic and cultural needs of children and young people. Interpretation and translation services are used to aid effective communication with children, young people and families.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The common assessment framework (CAF) is established across a range of partner agencies. Action has been taken to embed its use, and as a result, the numbers of appropriate CAFs have increased. Examples of comprehensive CAFs were seen by inspectors and the involvement of families was demonstrated well. This was an area of development identified at the last inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Families benefit from a wide range of support services offered by the council and its partner agencies. This includes specific support services to children, young people and their families who experience domestic abuse. ƒ Record keeping is up to date and of good quality, this ensures that important information is readily available to inform decisions, case planning and direct work with children. Records routinely include comprehensive chronologies of significant events and provide evidence to support judgements in assessment.

p.2

following areas

ƒ There is a good senior management oversight of the work of the contact, referral and assessment arrangements. This includes effective auditing which has resulted in appropriate action identified to continue to improve the service.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Staff morale is high, and is supported by regular formal and informal supervision although the recording of these does not always reflect these discussions. Social workers have a manageable caseload which has increased their capacity to undertake more direct work with children and young people.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Newly qualified social workers speak highly of the support provided by managers. They report that they have a good professional development programme which includes induction, protected caseloads and enhanced levels of supervision. They benefit from working alongside experienced social workers which is contributing to improvements in practice.

p.3

following areas

ƒ The emergency duty team arrangements are clear and robust with well coordinated and effective communication links with daytime services.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The presence of children at domestic violence incidents is not routinely recorded by police or the duty team. However, managers are aware of this shortfall and are taking appropriate action. Inspectors did not identify any children at risk as a result of this practice.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Timothy Wheadon, Chief Executive, Bracknell Forest Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion