Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Stephen Hunt
- Postcode verified
LE3 8RA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The implementation of a highly effective centralised referral team which is co-located with the common assessment framework (CAF) team ensures that Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570 p.1
- They link very well with the day referral services to enable a prompt, informed and effective response to safeguard children and young people. p.2
- Management demonstrates sustained impact on improving practice through the implementation of effective plans that are based on clear and accurate self assessment. p.2
- Joint visits to children and their families are immediate, well planned and focused promptly on the safeguarding needs of vulnerable children and young people. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular the caseloads of newly qualified social workers are too high. p.3
- Some are still largely descriptive, lacking analysis and assessment. p.3
- This was an area for development at the previous inspection. p.3
- This leads to some inefficiency in working practices and use of resources. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children in your area. p.3
- Copy: John Sinnott, Chief Executive, Leicestershire County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 777
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Gareth Williams Director of Children’s Services Leicestershire County Council County Hall Glenfield Leicestershire LE3 8RA
p.1
arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Leicestershire County Council which was conducted on 7 and 8 June 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services
Six of the eight areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in August 2010 have been met. The quality of assessments and the variability of workloads between offices remain as areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
The implementation of a highly effective centralised referral team which is co-located with the common assessment framework (CAF) team ensures that Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
Strengths
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk thresholds are applied consistently across the county. Consequently, children and young people identified as at risk of significant harm receive a prompt, focused child protection response.
p.1
Strengths
Well developed multi-agency working arrangements with the police ensure timely and good quality safeguarding of children and young people. Joint visits to children and their families are immediate, well planned and focused promptly on the safeguarding needs of vulnerable children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Clear procedures and policies are in place to ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people are met.
p.2
following areas
The relevance of equality and diversity issues appropriately inform casework assessment and planning to meet the safeguarding needs of children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Prompt action is taken to ensure that the safety of children and young people is identified and that plans are implemented. Section 47 enquiries are conducted in a thorough and timely manner by suitably experienced and qualified social workers.
p.2
following areas
Use of the CAF has increased significantly since the last unannounced inspection in August 2010 with high numbers now completed. This was an area for development in the previous inspection and the improved performance now provides opportunities for better preventative multi-agency support to children and young people.
p.2
following areas
The council has taken appropriate action to agree and issue revised inter- agency thresholds to provide effective safeguarding to children and young people. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.2
following areas
Out of hours duty arrangements are clear and robust. They link very well with the day referral services to enable a prompt, informed and effective response to safeguard children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Effective steps are taken to improve performance in child protection. Regular internal audit leads to action by managers that has a positive impact on improving safeguarding practice. Performance development reviews are now in place and in most cases supervision is regular. The lessons learned from serious case reviews are contributing to improving practice.
p.2
following areas
Management demonstrates sustained impact on improving practice through the implementation of effective plans that are based on clear and accurate self assessment.
p.2
following areas
Staff report that training is accessible and relevant with good opportunities for professional development.
p.2
Areas for development
Although the council recognises that practitioner workloads remain too variable in size, effective remedial action is yet to be taken. In particular the caseloads of newly qualified social workers are too high.
p.3
Areas for development
The quality of assessments remains too variable. Some are still largely descriptive, lacking analysis and assessment. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The new computerised recording system is not yet fully effective or used consistently by staff. This leads to some inefficiency in working practices and use of resources.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children in your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: John Sinnott, Chief Executive, Leicestershire County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion