Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Hunt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Hunt

  • Postcode verified

    LE3 8RA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehighly effectiveconsistentlyvery wellwell plannedclearimprovingstrength
Criticismat riskseriousvariablelackingharmyet tonot yetnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings654w+59
  • What needs to improve123w−68

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mr Gareth Williams Director of Children’s Services Leicestershire County Council County Hall Glenfield Leicestershire LE3 8RA

p.1

arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Leicestershire County Council which was conducted on 7 and 8 June 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services

Six of the eight areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in August 2010 have been met. The quality of assessments and the variability of workloads between offices remain as areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Leicestershire County Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The implementation of a highly effective centralised referral team which is co-located with the common assessment framework (CAF) team ensures that Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk thresholds are applied consistently across the county. Consequently, children and young people identified as at risk of significant harm receive a prompt, focused child protection response.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Well developed multi-agency working arrangements with the police ensure timely and good quality safeguarding of children and young people. Joint visits to children and their families are immediate, well planned and focused promptly on the safeguarding needs of vulnerable children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Clear procedures and policies are in place to ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people are met.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The relevance of equality and diversity issues appropriately inform casework assessment and planning to meet the safeguarding needs of children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Prompt action is taken to ensure that the safety of children and young people is identified and that plans are implemented. Section 47 enquiries are conducted in a thorough and timely manner by suitably experienced and qualified social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Use of the CAF has increased significantly since the last unannounced inspection in August 2010 with high numbers now completed. This was an area for development in the previous inspection and the improved performance now provides opportunities for better preventative multi-agency support to children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The council has taken appropriate action to agree and issue revised inter- agency thresholds to provide effective safeguarding to children and young people. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Out of hours duty arrangements are clear and robust. They link very well with the day referral services to enable a prompt, informed and effective response to safeguard children and young people.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Effective steps are taken to improve performance in child protection. Regular internal audit leads to action by managers that has a positive impact on improving safeguarding practice. Performance development reviews are now in place and in most cases supervision is regular. The lessons learned from serious case reviews are contributing to improving practice.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Management demonstrates sustained impact on improving practice through the implementation of effective plans that are based on clear and accurate self assessment.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff report that training is accessible and relevant with good opportunities for professional development.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Although the council recognises that practitioner workloads remain too variable in size, effective remedial action is yet to be taken. In particular the caseloads of newly qualified social workers are too high.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of assessments remains too variable. Some are still largely descriptive, lacking analysis and assessment. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The new computerised recording system is not yet fully effective or used consistently by staff. This leads to some inefficiency in working practices and use of resources.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children in your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: John Sinnott, Chief Executive, Leicestershire County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion