Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bill Wallace

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bill Wallace

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery wellclearstrengthimprovedconsistenttimelyaccurate
Criticismat risknot consistentlynot alwayslackingnot sufficientlyharmvariabletoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings584w+47
  • What needs to improve159w−78

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
743
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 25, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Ms Helen Jenner Corporate Director of Children’s Services London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Town Hall 1 Town Square Barking 1G11 7LU

p.1

children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council which was conducted on 7 and 8 December 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

children’s services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in November 2009 have been considered during the inspection. The local authority developed an action plan and significant progress has been made in these areas. Some areas of development continue to be addressed but a clear plan is in place.

p.1

children’s services

The area of priority action identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in November 2009 has been addressed. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

children’s services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The continuum of needs and services model for all agencies and considerable expansion in the use of the very well established common assessment framework ensure that partner agencies make appropriate referrals to children’s social care or to agencies that provide early intervention services. These effective arrangements provide widespread, consistent and prompt early intervention support services to children and families.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Out-of-hours arrangements for receiving and responding to referrals are effective and demonstrate clear analysis of need and appropriate links to daytime services and partner agencies.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Good performance management has resulted in improvements in the timeliness of initial assessments.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Where children are at risk of significant harm prompt and appropriate action is taken to ensure that they are safeguarded. This includes appropriate multi- agency involvement and clear arrangements between the assessment teams and children with disabilities team.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Safeguarding investigations are undertaken by suitably qualified and experienced social workers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Records of initial child protection case conferences seen by inspectors demonstrate that children and families are involved in decision making and that the meetings contribute to effective child protection planning.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Newly qualified social workers receive good support and training opportunities and have protected caseloads. Staff value the support they receive from accessible and experienced managers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children and families are appropriately involved in contributing to their assessments and attending planning meetings.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff workloads are manageable and this enables initial assessments to be delivered in a timely manner.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The council has progressed the implementation of the new integrated children’s system which has resulted in more accurate case records and improved management information.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Case records do not consistently and comprehensively reflect social work practice and decision making. Managers therefore do not always have an immediate audit trail of case decisions to confirm effective oversight of contacts and referrals and that the full range of children’s needs have been met.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of initial assessments is variable with too many lacking detailed analysis of children’s needs. They are too narrative and case recordings do not sufficiently demonstrate how risk and protective factors have been considered; this was an area of development at the previous inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: David Woods, Acting Chief Executive, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Simon Hart, Chair of London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Rocky Gill, Lead Member for Children’s Services, London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion