Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
N11 1NP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Records of case discussions are handwritten and then scanned, which means that they are not always legible. p.3
- The council recognises this and is introducing electronic supervision forms to ensure better recording of reflective practice and social workers’ professional development needs. p.3
- Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding p.3
- Copy: Nick Walkley, Chief Executive, London Borough of Barnet Tim Beach, Chair of Barnet Safeguarding Children Board Fiona Bulmer, Lead Member for Children’s Services, London Borough of Barnet Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 846
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 26, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Robert McCulloch-Graham Director of Children’s Services The London Borough of Barnet North London Business Park (NLBP) Oakleigh Road South London N11 1NP
p.1
Children’s Services
This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Barnet which was conducted on 18 and 19 November 2009. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year.
p.1
Children’s Services
The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.
p.1
Children’s Services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.
p.1
Children’s Services
From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:
p.1
Children’s Services
Children and young people are involved appropriately in assessments and their views are taken into account when making plans for their future.
p.1
Children’s Services
Decisions about incoming contacts and referrals are made in accordance with statutory timescales and are appropriate. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk Consideration of equality and diversity is effective and well reflected in casework practice and planning. For example, children and young people have good access to interpreters covering a wide range of languages that are used in local communities.
p.1
Children’s Services
Social workers’ caseloads are well managed and services are delivered effectively, despite a 50% increase in referrals of children in need during the past two years.
p.2
Children’s Services
Management of contacts and referrals to the disabled children’s team is good and consistent with arrangements in the referral and assessment service.
p.2
Children’s Services
Social workers have good access to regular supervision and training and value the professional advice and support provided by line managers.
p.2
Children’s Services
The Barnet Safeguarding Children Board has delivered training and briefings which have effectively informed social workers of the learning from serious case reviews.
p.2
Children’s Services
Out of hours services are good and well co-ordinated with daytime services.
p.2
Children’s Services
From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:
p.2
Strengths
An experienced and stable management team provides effective leadership to staff and ensures that the needs of vulnerable children and young people are identified and responded to appropriately. All cases seen by inspectors had been responded to effectively and in a timely manner.
p.2
Strengths
Child protection enquiries are thorough and timely and are always carried out by a qualified social worker. Appropriate action ensures that safeguarding concerns about children who have been referred to the service are minimised.
p.2
Strengths
Inter-agency thresholds are clear and are effectively applied with timely referrals of individual children from partner agencies and consistency in responsiveness.
p.2
Strengths
Well-established partnership working between statutory agencies and particularly good use of voluntary section provision contribute very effectively to safeguarding and support for children. This ensures that families receive the necessary intervention from a wide range of services. For example, the Afghan Women’s Centre provides good support to women experiencing domestic violence. Senior managers support staff who are working with complex cases through a well-established care planning forum. This enables effective senior management involvement, challenge in decision making and good oversight of casework practice.
p.2
Strengths
Senior managers have a good understanding of the quality of services. A wide range of audits are systematically undertaken and used effectively to inform service development and maintain good practice.
p.3
Areas for development
While core assessments clearly focus on the holistic needs of children, include a high level of detailed information, and lead to appropriate plans, the quality of analysis is variable and is insufficiently underpinned with research and evidence-based practice.
p.3
Areas for development
Where there are several children in a family, core assessments of children in need are not always sufficiently focused on each child as an individual.
p.3
Areas for development
Records of supervision are not consistently clear about what needs to be achieved and by when. Records of case discussions are handwritten and then scanned, which means that they are not always legible. The council recognises this and is introducing electronic supervision forms to ensure better recording of reflective practice and social workers’ professional development needs.
p.3
Areas for development
Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding
p.3
Areas for development
Copy: Nick Walkley, Chief Executive, London Borough of Barnet Tim Beach, Chair of Barnet Safeguarding Children Board Fiona Bulmer, Lead Member for Children’s Services, London Borough of Barnet Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion