Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Judith Nelson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Judith Nelson

  • Postcode verified

    S70 9FH

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelypositivetimelystrengthskilledknowledgeablesuccessfully
Criticismrisk of harmat riskconcernsnot yetharmnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings991w+42
  • What needs to improve96w+17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mrs Edna Sutton Director for Children, Young People and Families Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council PO Box 609 Barnsley S70 9FH

p.1

services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 12 and 13 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

services

The inspection identified an area of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with an area for development.

p.1

services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in May 2010 have been addressed by the council through an action plan. One area of development was found to have not yet been fully addressed and therefore it remains an area for development. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ A very stable, skilled and experienced workforce is supported well by good training and development opportunities and effective management oversight. This is contributing to timely interventions that safeguard children and young people effectively.

p.2

following areas

ƒ In the cases seen by inspectors the risk of harm was appropriately identified and managed effectively and children and young people were safeguarded.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Initial and core assessments are generally of a good standard with all at least adequate. Children and young people and their families are seen and their views are included in assessments. Inspectors saw good examples of proactive and persistent work by social workers to ensure that children and young people were seen alone and good work with young children was evidenced in case files.

p.2

following areas

ƒ All child protection enquiries are undertaken by suitably qualified and experienced social workers. Joint work with the police and other agencies is undertaken where appropriate. Risks and protective factors are identified in assessments and suitable plans protect and meet the needs of children and young people well.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Prompt and appropriate decision-making in the assessment and the disabled children teams ensures that children and young people at risk of harm are identified and receive an appropriate response. Good communication with partner agencies at an early stage ensures that their information informs decisions. Referrers and families are appropriately signposted where involvement by social care is not appropriate.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments include information about ethnicity, disability and religion and a recent amendment to the electronic recording system reinforces this well. Staff understand the changing profile of Barnsley’s population which has informed their practice. Some good examples of culturally sensitive work were seen in case files. Assessments of the individual needs of disabled children are good and benefit from an experienced and knowledgeable disabled children team.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Referrers receive letters to inform them of the outcome of their referrals.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Record keeping is generally up-to-date and this supports effective case management. Management decisions are clearly recorded on individual children’s case files. Staff feedback has led to good improvements in the electronic recording system. ƒ Barnsley Safeguarding Children Board procedures and guidance comply with statutory requirements, are up-to-date and are readily accessible to staff in social care and in partner agencies. Assessment team staff and managers are aware of and use the procedures to ensure that contacts, referrals and assessments are responded to promptly and undertaken appropriately.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The Barnsley Safeguarding Children Board has agreed inter-agency thresholds which incorporate the common assessment framework (CAF) approach.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Partners have a clear plan about how CAF can be further reinforced and extended and have a firm commitment to enhanced training across the partnership. Effective measures are in place to monitor whether CAF assessments are working successfully and there are robust systems to ensure that decisions to undertake CAF assessments are followed up with support offered to partner agencies undertaking them.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Senior and front line managers receive regular performance management information which enables them to monitor the referral and assessment service and respond effectively. Front line managers share performance information with staff teams to promote their awareness of trends or concerns. The information is also regularly shared with and monitored by elected members, the Local Safeguarding Children Board and the Children’s Trust executive board.

p.3

following areas

ƒ There is good staff morale. Staff report a high level of satisfaction with the support that they receive from their line managers and service managers and are also very positive about the accessibility of their senior managers.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Staff receive, and value, regular formal supervision and also effectively use their managers’ day-to-day accessibility for consultation and advice which contributes to good decision-making and casework. These consultations are recorded on children’s case files.

p.3

following areas

ƒ All staff undertaking child protection work are appropriately qualified and experienced. They value the very good access to training and development opportunities to consolidate and develop their skills and expertise in working with children and families.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Caseloads of social workers undertaking assessments are manageable, including those of the disabled children team. A workload management system supports staff to complete assessments in a thorough and timely way.

p.3

following areas

ƒ Emergency duty arrangements are effective and regular management liaison promotes positive working relationships with the assessment teams to secure good information sharing arrangements.

p.3

Area for development

ƒ While there are examples of detailed and well recorded case discussions, the timely recording in case files of decisions made within supervision is not consistent across the assessment teams. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.4

Area for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Phil Coppard, Chief Executive, Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Simon Hart, Chair of Barnsley Safeguarding Children Board Cllr Linda Burgess, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion