Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sean Tarpey
- Postcode verified
BS31 1DN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Arrangements for the transfer of cases to long term teams are clear, flexible and effectively implemented which means that children and young people do not suffer from unacceptable delays to the continuity of the services they receive. p.2
- The council has implemented a wide range of integrated preventative services that have successfully offered assistance and support to families in need which have improved their circumstances thereby avoiding the need for other forms of intervention to safeguard or protect children and young people. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Such practice may lead to a lack of clarity as to how, and by whom, the known concerns will be monitored and addressed prior to assessment. p.3
- Although children and young people are safeguarded weakness in analysis means that case planning for some children in need is insufficiently robust and timely. p.3
- The areas for development set out above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: John Everitt, Chief Executive, Bath and North East Somerset Council Jim Gould, Chair of Bath and North East Somerset Safeguarding Children Board Chris Watt, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Bath and North East Somerset Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 912
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 30, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 25 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Ashley Ayre Strategic Director: Children's Services Bath and North East Somerset Council PO Box 25 Riverside Temple Street Keynsham Bristol BS31 1DN
p.1
arrangements within Bath and North East Somerset children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Bath and North East Somerset Council which was conducted on 11 and 12 January 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Bath and North East Somerset children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors attended and observed practice at a Section 47 strategy discussion and a duty team meeting. Inspectors were able to speak to a range of staff within children’s social care including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. In addition telephone contact was made with representatives of key partners from within the police and health services as well as the emergency duty team.
p.1
arrangements within Bath and North East Somerset children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Bath and North East Somerset children’s services
The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in May 2010 are being addressed within an action plan. While some progress has been made the majority of measures taken are yet to demonstrate sufficient and sustained impact. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Bath and North East Somerset children’s services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Domestic abuse is recognised well and expertly managed by a dedicated, multi-disciplinary service which offers specialist consultation, training, assessment and a range of interventions which result in children and young people being safeguarded well. There is good evidence of a reduction in repeat episodes of abuse which otherwise could have resulted in children being unable to live safely within their families.
p.2
Strengths
The council has implemented a wide range of integrated preventative services that have successfully offered assistance and support to families in need which have improved their circumstances thereby avoiding the need for other forms of intervention to safeguard or protect children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Clear procedures and policies are in place to inform practice and ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard and protect children and young people are met.
p.2
following areas
Cases that require Section 47 enquiries are identified and, in most cases, undertaken in a thorough and timely manner by social workers who are suitably qualified and experienced.
p.2
following areas
Children and young people with a disability receive an effective service from the specialist disabled children team which is conversant and sensitive to their particular needs.
p.2
following areas
Arrangements for the transfer of cases to long term teams are clear, flexible and effectively implemented which means that children and young people do not suffer from unacceptable delays to the continuity of the services they receive.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for access to children’s services are applied consistently and protocols for joint working are agreed with, and well understood, by partner agencies.
p.2
following areas
Record keeping is mostly up-to-date and demonstrates effective management of risk of harm to children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Out-of-hours duty arrangements are clear and appropriately linked to the daytime referral processes.
p.2
following areas
Regular informal and planned formal supervision is well established and valued by staff. Staff have access to appropriate training to meet their professional development needs.
p.2
following areas
Social work caseloads are manageable as a result of effective oversight by supervisors that carefully considers the capacity and capability of staff.
p.3
Areas for development
Equality and diversity issues are not consistently addressed in casework, assessment and care planning.
p.3
Areas for development
The delay in commencing assessments of some children in need cases means that children and young people may be waiting for longer than is necessary for their needs to be assessed.
p.3
Areas for development
Referring agencies are not routinely informed of the proposed actions of children’s social care following referral of children in need cases. Such practice may lead to a lack of clarity as to how, and by whom, the known concerns will be monitored and addressed prior to assessment.
p.3
Areas for development
The quality of analysis within assessments is variable and does not consistently reflect sufficient focus on key risk and protective factors. Although children and young people are safeguarded weakness in analysis means that case planning for some children in need is insufficiently robust and timely.
p.3
Areas for development
Recorded managerial comments on the quality of practice are not consistently evident in case records.
p.3
Areas for development
The wishes and feelings of children and young people which are usually ascertained well in the assessment process fail to sufficiently influence individual case plans.
p.3
Areas for development
The areas for development set out above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: John Everitt, Chief Executive, Bath and North East Somerset Council Jim Gould, Chair of Bath and North East Somerset Safeguarding Children Board Chris Watt, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Bath and North East Somerset Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion