Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 1
- Words of findings
- 371
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Average
Childminder 131 11 63 24 2 75% above above
p.1
Average
Childcare - Non-Domestic 86 9 66 24 76% above above
p.1
Average
Sixth Form School 9 22 33 44 56% below below
p.1
Average
Pupil Referral Unit 1 100 100% above above
p.1
Average
General Further Education and Tertiary 1 100 100% above above
p.1
Average
Private Fostering Arrangements Every Child Matters indicators: National Indicator Set
p.1
quartiles Above In line Below Above In line Below
3. Enjoying and achieving 2 36 50 50 1 1 0 0 1 1
p.1
quartiles Above In line Below Above In line Below
Notes: 1) Please see the Ofsted publication 'CAA: annual rating of council children's services' for a full list of the indicators used to produce this summary profile, indicators included in the full performance profile, and other evidence used to inform the children and young people element of the joint inspectorate CAA report. 2) For inspected services data the bands for % judged good or better are based on the following cut off points: dark green is 80% of providers or over, light green is 65-79.99%, amber is 50-64.99%, red is less than 50%. 3) For ECM/NIS data, data available is the number of indicators where data currently available to Ofsted, and total NIS is the number of NIS indicators relevant to this outcome. Some NIS are not available until the second year of CAA. For year 1 the bands are based on quartile distribution. The most up to date time period available is used for the summary profile, but time periods vary between different
p.1
quartiles Above In line Below Above In line Below
indicators (for instance financial or academic year). ECM grades from Ofsted inspections of providers will also be considered as part of the full performance profile. 4) Comparison with similar areas is based on the children's services statistical neighbours groups developed by NFER and DCSF. 5) NI78, NI67, NI89a and NI76 have been excluded from the quartiles banding and comparisons with Statistical Neighbours and National Average 6) Sixth form schools includes secondary schools, special schools and PRUs
p.1
Quarter 3 : 14 August 2009
Safeguarding and looked after children inspections, including unannounced inspections and serious case reviews
p.1
Quarter 3 : 14 August 2009
Joint Area Review n/a Looked after Children n/a
p.1
Quarter 3 : 14 August 2009
n/a Safeguarding n/a Serious Case Reviews conducted adequately or better 01/04/07 - 15/07/09 out of Annual unannounced referral and assessment (safeguarding) inspection n/a n/a
p.1
Quarter 3 : 14 August 2009
Three-yearly inspection of safeguarding n/a n/a
p.1
Quarter 3 : 14 August 2009
Three-yearly inspection of services for looked after children n/a n/a
p.1
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion