Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 869
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Sue Imbriano Director of Children's Services Buckinghamshire County Council Room 20E County Hall Walton Street Aylesbury Buckinghamshire HP20 1UZ
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children’s services in Buckinghamshire County Council perform well.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The overall effectiveness of the large majority of inspected services and settings is good or better. Achievement at Key Stages 2 and 4 is well above similar areas and that seen nationally and GCSE results continue to rise. A large proportion of primary schools are good or outstanding, showing performance above similar areas and that found nationally. However, for secondary and sixth form schools the proportion of provision that is good or better is average as one third are satisfactory. While performance is above comparators for secondary schools, where wide variation in performance is levelling rapidly, it is below similar areas and national averages for school sixth forms. One of two general further education and tertiary providers is good, the other is satisfactory. Numbers of young people that are not in education, training or employment at age 18 are very low and achievement of level 2 and 3 qualifications has improved to well above the national average and similar areas.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Provision for children and others whose circumstances make them vulnerable is mixed. Eight of twelve special schools are good or better but four are satisfactory, showing performance below similar areas and that seen nationally. All five pupil referral units are at least good, showing performance above similar areas and performance nationally. The boarding school is outstanding but four residential special schools range from outstanding to inadequate, showing overall performance in line with similar areas and that seen nationally.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
In the Early Years Foundation Stage, achievement is in line with similar areas and that found nationally. A very large proportion of nurseries are good or better, showing performance above similar areas and that seen nationally. The large majority of childcare settings and childminders are also good or better although almost one third are satisfactory in both. Nevertheless, for childminders, performance is above similar areas and that found nationally. For looked after children, the four children’s homes are good as are the fostering and adoption agencies. Private fostering arrangements are satisfactory. For looked after children, achievement at Key Stage 2 is consistently above similar areas and in line with the national average. The recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements for children in need found no areas for priority action, although generally very high quality assessments to some degree affected
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Performance against the very large majority of national indicators, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is at least in line with similar areas and broadly in line with or better than the national figure, although there are weaknesses in four of the five Every Child Matters outcomes. The difference in the performance of children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable and others of the same age is mostly in line with similar areas and that found nationally. While very high attainment overall continues to improve, gaps are closing most noticeably for: pupils eligible for free school meals; those with special educational needs; minority ethnic groups; and qualifications achieved by the age of 19.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.3
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion