Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pietro Battista

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pietro Battista

  • Postcode verified

    EC2P 2EJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepromptlystrengthtimelyclearswiftly
Criticismlacknot sufficientlyvariableyet tonot robustlownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings470w+48
  • What needs to improve145w−70

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
615
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 24%

Full report text

Ms Joy Hollister Director of Community and Children’s Services City of London PO Box 270 Guildhall London EC2P 2EJ

p.1

arrangements within City of London children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the City of London Council which was conducted on 15 April 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within City of London children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within City of London children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and satisfactory practice, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within City of London children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Staff are well motivated and value the professional advice and support provided by managers, who are readily accessible for formal and informal consultation.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Low levels of referrals enable staff caseloads to be manageable and for most assessments to be timely. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Managers have commissioned a good range of audits of the service which have been appropriately used to focus service development and to take action to address issues identified.

p.1

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Clear procedures and practices are in place to ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people are met.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Systems for receiving referrals are effective. Administrative processes work well to support work within the team.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Contacts and referrals are promptly responded to with effective decision making on required actions.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ All cases held within referral and assessment services are allocated to suitably qualified staff. Child protection referrals are responded to promptly and are assessed by suitably experienced qualified social workers.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Children are routinely seen during assessments.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Equality and diversity issues are satisfactorily addressed in casework assessment and planning.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Communication and liaison with partner agencies are satisfactory. This contributes towards prompt referral and exchange of information.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Most assessments are of a satisfactory quality. Some are good, but others lack sufficient analysis or detail.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Managers at all levels routinely audit cases.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Managers have promptly identified and acted swiftly on unsatisfactory casework and managerial oversight issues within the team.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Recording of case discussion and personal development undertaken in supervision is variable in quality. A new supervision policy has recently been introduced but has yet to be embedded.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Managerial oversight and case planning, including the recording of management decision making on case files, are not sufficiently robust or consistent.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Staff have access to safeguarding training opportunities. However most staff within the team have not recently participated in safeguarding training to maintain up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding developments and practice. Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.2

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Mr Chris Duffield, Chief Executive, City of London Corporation Ms Fran Pearson, Chair of City Hackney Safeguarding Children Board Mr Billy Dove, MBE, Chairman of Community and Children's Services, City of London Corporation Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion