Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
CR9 2BA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Serious illness or accident of a child. 0 Outbreak of serious infectious disease at a foster home. 0 Actual or suspected involvement of a child in prostitution. 0 p.18
- However most of the responses from carers who attended the group meeting with the Inspection team stated that there continues to be anomalies in respect of finances, which included, inadequate support, and delays in decisions on financial enhancements and changes to the allowances. p.32
- The following 4-point scale is used to indicate the extent to which standards have been met or not met by placing the assessed level alongside the phrase "Standard met?" p.2
- NO Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(1) of the Care Standards Act 2000 of substantial failure to satisfy regulatory requirements by a Local Authority fostering service: p.9
- At the previous annual inspection the service Manager identified a weakness in the collection collation and analysis of data in order to inform management decision making and identify developing trends. p.18
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Requirements from last Inspection visit fully actioned? p.10
- Identified below are areas not addressed from the last inspection report which indicate a non-compliance with the Care Standards Act 2000 and Fostering Services Regulations 2002. p.10
- Regulation Standard Required actions Timescale for action 30 (1) FS25 A monitoring system needs to be introduced to ensure that all required information on the case records is in place and maintained. 21/07/03 p.10
- London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 9 p.10
- London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 10 p.12
- Action Plan: The appropriate Officer of the Local Authority or the Registered Person (as applicable) is requested to provide the Commission with an Action Plan, which indicates how requirements and recommendations are to be addressed. p.12
- This action plan will be made available on request to the Area Office. p.12
- Identified below are areas addressed in the main body of the report which indicate non- compliance with the Care Standards Act 2000, the Children Act 1989, the Fostering Services Regulations 2002, or the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services. p.12
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 40
- Words of findings
- 7,440
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Service
Room FR4.06 Fell Road Taberner House Croydon Surrey CR9 2BA
p.1
Service
13th January 2004 (Inspection Commenced) Fostering Services
p.1
Commission for Social Care Inspection
Launched in April 2004, the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) is the single inspectorate for social care in England.
p.2
Commission for Social Care Inspection
The Commission combines the work formerly done by the Social Services Inspectorate (SSI), the SSI/Audit Commission Joint Review Team and the National Care Standards Commission.
p.2
The role of CSCI is to:
• Promote improvement in social care • Inspect all social care - for adults and children - in the public, private and voluntary sectors • Publish annual reports to Parliament on the performance of social care and on the state of the social care market • Inspect and assess ‘Value for Money’ of council social services • Hold performance statistics on social care • Publish the ‘star ratings’ for council social services • Register and inspect services against national standards • Host the Children’s Rights Director role.
p.2
Inspection Methods & Findings
SECTION B of this report summarises key findings and evidence from this inspection. The following 4-point scale is used to indicate the extent to which standards have been met or not met by placing the assessed level alongside the phrase "Standard met?"
p.2
The 4-point scale ranges from:
4 - Standard Exceeded (Commendable) 3 - Standard Met (No Shortfalls) 2 - Standard Almost Met (Minor Shortfalls) 1 - Standard Not Met (Major Shortfalls) 'O' or blank in the 'Standard met?' box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion. '9' in the 'Standard met?' box denotes standard not applicable. 'X' is used where a percentage value or numerical value is not applicable. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 1
p.2
Name of Authority
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service
p.3
Address
Room FR4.06, Fell Road, Taberner House, Croydon, Surrey, CR9 2BA
p.3
Address
Room FR4.06, Fell Road, Taberner House, Croydon, Surrey, CR9 2BA
p.3
Date of first registration Date of latest registration certificate
Date of last inspection 31/03/03 London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 2 Date of Inspection Visit 13th January 2004 ID Code
p.3
inspections and bring a different
perspective to the inspection process. Name of Specialist (e.g.
p.4
the time of inspection
Mr Sammy Forbes London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 3
p.4
D.3. Provider’s agreement
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 4
p.6
INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION
Independent and local authority fostering services which fall within the jurisdiction of the National Care Standards Commission (NCSC) are subject to inspection, to establish if the service is meeting the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services and the requirements of the Care Standards Act 2000, the Fostering Services Regulations 2002 and the Children Act 1989 as amended.
p.6
INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION
This document summarises the inspection findings of the NCSC in respect of London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service. The inspection findings relate to the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services published by the Secretary of State under sections 23 and 49 of the Care Standards Act 2000, for independent and local authority fostering services respectively.
p.6
INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION
The Fostering Services Regulations 2002 are secondary legislation, with which a service provider must comply. Service providers are expected to comply fully with the National Minimum Standards. The National Minimum standards will form the basis for judgements by the NCSC in relation to independent fostering agencies regarding registration, the imposition and variation of registration conditions and any enforcement action, and in relation to local authority fostering services regarding notices to the local authority and reports to the Secretary of State under section 47 of the Care Standards Act 2000. The report follows the format of the National Minimum Standards and the numbering shown in the report corresponds to that of the standards.
p.6
INTRODUCTION TO REPORT AND INSPECTION
The report will show the following: • Inspection methods used • Key findings and evidence • Overall ratings in relation to the standards • Compliance with the Regulations • Notifications to the Local Authority and Reports to the Secretary of State • Required actions on the part of the provider • Recommended good practice • Summary of the findings • Report of the Lay Assessor (where relevant) • Providers response and proposed action plan to address findings
p.6
INSPECTION VISITS
Inspections will be undertaken in line with the agreed regulatory framework with additional visits as required. This is in accordance with the provisions of the Care Standards Act 2000. The following inspection methods have been used in the production of this report. The report represents the inspector's findings from the evidence found at the specified inspection dates. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES PROVIDED. Croydon Fostering Service at the time of the inspection had 160 foster carers looking after 172 children. The core function of the service is the recruitment, training and support of foster carers who can provide a range of flexible placements to match the needs of children from a diverse community. In order to maintain this service it provides a 24 hour support service, a mentoring support scheme for all new foster carers in their first year of fostering, a
p.6
INSPECTION VISITS
confidential counselling service, a support group for grandparents who have fostered their own grandchildren, a support group for long term foster carers and a support group for foster carers of unaccompanied minors. It also has a remand fostering scheme. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 6
p.7
Inspector’s Summary
(This is an overview of the inspector’s findings, which includes good practice, quality issues, areas to be addressed or developed and any other concerns.) The fostering service was found to continue to be well managed and adequately resourced for the level of services it provides. There continues to be a clear and achievable development plan that reflected national and local priorities. There were a total of nine requirements and ten recommendations. Of these there are a number that relate to the provision of appropriate information about the needs of children being placed and in particular about the way in which information is not adequately shared between placing social work teams and the fostering service. Monitoring systems still require improvement in terms of their effective application, particularly in respect of the case files but it is still hoped that generally this would be assisted by the introduction of an improved data base IT system.
p.8
Inspector’s Summary
The number of positive suggestions that were made by both foster carers and children are commented upon in this report and the service are advised to explore these suggestions in detail as they are all geared to improving communication and making helpful change. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 7
p.8
(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)
The following statutory Reports or Notifications are to be made under the Care Standards Act as a result of the findings of this inspection:
p.9
(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)
NO Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(3) of the Care Standards Act 2000 that the Commission considers the Local Authority's fostering service satisfies the regulatory requirements:
p.9
(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)
YES Notice to the Local Authority under section 47(5) of the Care Standards Act 2000 of failure(s) to satisfy regulatory requirements in their fostering service which are not substantial, and specifying the action the Commission considers the Authority should take to remedy the failure(s), informing the Secretary of State of that Notice: YES Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(4)(a) of the Care Standards Act of a failure by a Local Authority fostering service to satisfy regulatory requirements which is not considered substantial:
p.9
(Local Authority Fostering Services Only)
NO Report to the Secretary of State under section 47(1) of the Care Standards Act 2000 of substantial failure to satisfy regulatory requirements by a Local Authority fostering service:
p.9
The grounds for the above Report or Notice are:
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 8
p.10
Implementation of Statutory Requirements from Last Inspection
Requirements from last Inspection visit fully actioned? NO
p.10
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Identified below are areas not addressed from the last inspection report which indicate a non-compliance with the Care Standards Act 2000 and Fostering Services Regulations 2002. No. Regulation Standard Required actions Timescale for action 30 (1) FS25 A monitoring system needs to be introduced to ensure that all required information on the case records is in place and maintained. 21/07/03
p.10
Action is being taken by the National Care Standards Commission to monitor
compliance with the above requirements. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 9
p.10
registration are listed below, with the inspector's assessment of compliance from
the evidence at the time of this inspection.
p.11
Date
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 10
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED DURING THIS INSPECTION
Action Plan: The appropriate Officer of the Local Authority or the Registered Person (as applicable) is requested to provide the Commission with an Action Plan, which indicates how requirements and recommendations are to be addressed. This action plan will be made available on request to the Area Office.
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
Identified below are areas addressed in the main body of the report which indicate non- compliance with the Care Standards Act 2000, the Children Act 1989, the Fostering Services Regulations 2002, or the National Minimum Standards for Fostering Services. The Authority or Registered Person(s) is/are required to comply within the given time scales in order to comply with the Regulatory Requirements for fostering services. No. Regulation Standard * Requirement Timescale for action
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
1 3 & 4 FS1 The fostering service must provide the Commission with the date on which the Statement of Purpose was formally approved by the divisional management team. 31/05/04
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
2 34 FS7 There must be more proactive thinking around the provision of aids and adaptations for families who look after children with disabilities, even if these are intended only as short term placements. Aids and adaptations must be made available to facilitate proper care of children with disabilities at least as a result of the second placement review or sooner should the need arise. 31/05/04
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
3 15 FS12 The Authority must ensure that all relevant medical information, including consent to medical treatment and medical examinations are in place for all fostered children. 31/05/04
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
4 16 FS13 The Authority must ensure that Personal Education Plans and relevant education information is supplied and that more diligence is applied in obtaining any missing information. 31/05/04
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
30 (4) & 38 (2) FS22 The requirement to have foster care agreements in place must be diligently applied in all cases. 31/05/04
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
33 (b) & 38 (b) FS24 The Authority must urgently review the degree of liaison between the Looked After Children’s Teams in the district offices and the fostering service in order to ensure that information that is pertinent to the care of children is shared with the fostering service and carers without unnecessary delay. 31/05/04 London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 11 7 30 (1) FS25 An effective monitoring system needs to be introduced to ensure that all required information on the case records is in place and maintained (This requirement is outstanding from the previous annual inspection). 31/05/04
p.12
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
8 38 FS32 The fostering service must explore the view of friend and family carers in order to understand the perception of unequal treatment that exists and to address any shortcomings that may be identified. 31/05/04
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
Identified below are areas addressed in the main body of the report which relate to the National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice issues which should be considered for implementation by the Authority or Registered Person(s). No. Refer to Standard * Recommendation Action
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
1 FS8 The fostering service should examine in more detail with carers their views that a child’s skin colour may form a primary reason for ending a trans racial placement, and that more could be done to consider other factors such as language, diet and religion.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
2 FS9 Consideration should be given by the fostering service to establishing an independent support framework for carers that could advise and offer emotional support to those who experience allegations of abuse by a fostered child.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
3 FS11 The suggestions that were raised by children in their conversations with the Inspection team should be explored in depth with them by the fostering service.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
4 FS18 It would be advisable for the service remind all carers that they can access specific fostering service support outside of office hours.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
5 FS21 The perceptions that were raised by foster carers about the support that they receive are clearly at odds with the aim of the systems that the service has in place that is designed to support carers in their role. This should be explored by the service with carers.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
6 FS22 The view of foster carers that the foster care team should know when a child / young person is about to be moved, that as a result a place will then become available in that home, should be explored in more depth by the fostering service.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
7 FS22 The view of carers that they are not supported in making complaints should be explored in depth with them by the fostering service.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
8 FS23 The service should do better at evidencing what courses particular carers have attended, and to note this on the individual carers records. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 12 9 FS25 It would be advisable for the service to add to the standard reference request letter a specific question that asks the referee if they know of any information or reason that suggests that a prospective carer may be unsuitable to care for children.
p.13
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
10 FS29 The suggestion by carers that an itemised payment system would help to identify whether under or overpayments were being made should be examined in detail by the fostering service.
p.14
GOOD PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THIS INSPECTION
* Note: You may refer to the relevant standard in the remainder of the report by omitting the 2-letter prefix e.g FS10 refers to Standard 10.
p.14
PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS
The following inspection methods have been used in the production of this report Number of Inspector days spent 11
p.14
PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS
Survey of placing authorities YES Foster carer survey YES Foster children survey YES Checks with other organisations and Individuals YES • Directors of Social services YES • Child protection officer NO • Specialist advisor (s) NO • Local Foster Care Association NO Tracking Individual welfare arrangements YES • Interview with children YES • Interview with foster carers YES • Interview with agency staff YES • Contact with parents NO • Contact with supervising social workers YES • Examination of files YES Individual interview with manager YES Information from provider YES Individual interviews with key staff YES Group discussion with staff YES Interview with panel chair YES Observation of foster carer training NO Observation of foster panel YES Inspection of policy/practice documents YES Inspection of records YES Interview with individual child YES
p.14
PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS
Date of Inspection 13/01/04 Time of Inspection 10AM Duration Of Inspection (hrs) 77 London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 13 The following pages summarise the key findings and evidence from this inspection, together with the NCSC assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards have been met. The following scale is used to indicate the extent to which standards have been met or not met by placing the assessed level alongside the phrase "Standard met?"
p.14
PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS
The scale ranges from: 4 - Standard Exceeded (Commendable) 3 - Standard Met (No Shortfalls) 2 - Standard Almost Met (Minor Shortfalls) 1 - Standard Not Met (Major Shortfalls)
p.15
PART B INSPECTION METHODS & FINDINGS
"0" in the "Standard met?" box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion. "9" in the "Standard met?" box denotes standard not applicable. “X” is used where a percentage value or numerical value is not applicable. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 14
p.15
The intended outcome for the following standard is:
• There is clear statement of the aims and objectives of the fostering service and the fostering service ensures that they meet those aims and objectives.
p.16
There is a clear statement of the aims and objectives of the fostering service and of
what facilities and services they provide. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 As reported at the previous annual inspection the Croydon Fostering Service has produced a clear statement of the aims and objectives, which includes all the information required under standard 1.4. At the time of this inspection the inspection team were provided with a copy of this document that indicated that it is still in draft form and had yet to be approved. At the feedback meeting that took place as a result of this inspection the service agreed to supply the date on which the statement of purpose was approved by the divisional management team.
p.16
There is a clear statement of the aims and objectives of the fostering service and of
The Children’s Guide has now been finalised and contains the contact details of the National Care Standards Commission. This guide now makes an explicit statement about how children and young people can make complaints in general and specifically to the National Care Standards Commission. The Inspection team were informed that a copy of the Children’s Guide has been given to each foster carer and every child subject to their age and understanding. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 15
p.16
The intended outcomes for the following set of standards are:
• The fostering service is provided and managed by those with the appropriate
p.17
work efficiently and effectively and have the necessary knowledge and experience of
childcare and fostering to do so in a professional manner. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The management of the fostering service remains unchanged from that which was reported at the previous annual inspection. The Responsible Individual is the Divisional Director of Children’s Services Mr S. Liddicott and the Manager is Mr S. Forbes who is the Service Manager for Children’s Resources, which includes the Fostering Service. The manager showed an in-depth understanding of the complex needs of a fostering service, and had many proactive ideas for improvement. He has the necessary skills, knowledge and experience to carry on the in-house fostering provision. There is a clear programme of development for the fostering service that is derived from initiatives and targets set by Department of Health. The budget for the fostering service is in line with the development plans.
p.17
work efficiently and effectively and have the necessary knowledge and experience of
Mr Forbes confirmed that as the foster carer recruitment and retention programme has successfully achieved its targets there are now additional resources allocated to recruit sessional Social Work staff.
p.17
Any persons carrying on or managing the fostering service are suitable people to run
a business concerned with safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 A full review of the recruitment practice was not undertaken at this inspection as this had been carried out as part of the Social Services Inspectorate (SSI) review of children’s services in March 2002. The report stated that “there was good attention to vetting procedures, all files showed evidence that appropriate references, police and protection of children (POCAL) checks, proof of identity and verification of qualifications had been done”. A review of the background checks for the one permanent Social Work staff member, appointed since the previous annual inspection, was undertaken. This indicates that correct and diligent recruitment protocols continue to be applied. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 16
p.17
The intended outcomes for the following set of standards are:
• The fostering service is managed ethically and efficiently, delivering a good quality foster care service and avoiding confusion and conflicts of role.
p.18
There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the
fostering service and ensuring quality performance. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The job descriptions of the staff are clear and identify their responsibilities and roles. From the interviews with Supervising Social Workers it continues to be clear they understand their individual roles, responsibilities and decision making authority within the organisation and between themselves and the children’s allocated field Social Worker. The activities of fostering service staff are monitored through regular supervision and monitoring of agreed performance targets. The Fostering Service Plan identifies the agreed annual targets the service has to achieve. At the previous annual inspection the service Manager identified a weakness in the collection collation and analysis of data in order to inform management decision making and identify developing trends. Since that inspection the manager has set about exploring database systems that will allow for statistical analysis of trends
p.18
There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the
within the service and allow for the identification and monitoring of regular tasks and activities that the service has to undertake. There are financial procedures in place that continue to be independently monitored.
p.18
There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the
Number of statutory notifications made to NCSC in last 12 months: 0
p.18
There are clear procedures for monitoring and controlling the activities of the
Death of a child placed with foster parents. 0
p.18
Referral to Secretary of State of a person working for the service as
unsuitable to work with children. Serious illness or accident of a child. 0 Outbreak of serious infectious disease at a foster home. 0 Actual or suspected involvement of a child in prostitution. 0
p.18
Serious incident relating to a foster child involving calling the police to a
foster home. Serious complaint about a foster parent. 1 Initiation of child protection enquiry involving a child. 1
p.18
Serious incident relating to a foster child involving calling the police to a
Number of complaints made to NCSC about the agency in the past 12 months: 0 Number of the above complaints which were substantiated: 0 London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 17
p.18
Standard 5 (5.1 - 5.4)
The fostering service is managed effectively and efficiently. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The manager of the service has a clear job description identifying his roles and responsibilities for the fostering and adoption service. There are team managers who take day to day responsibility for these services who will also deputise in his absence. As reported at the previous annual inspection, the authority are to be mindful that the National Care Standards Commission are to be notified if the manager ceases to manage the service in order that it can verify what arrangements are in place to cover the absence. A notification of this type has not, however, been required to be made thus far. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 18
p.19
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• The fostering service promotes and safeguards the child/young person's physical, mental and emotional welfare.
p.20
The fostering service makes available foster carers who provide a safe, healthy and
nurturing environment. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 Evidence from tracking visits to the homes of foster carers and feedback from the children’s social workers and children’s questionnaires indicated that generally the accommodation provided continues to be suitable and safe. Foster carers are provided with written guidance on health and safety issues and First Aid training is also provided as part of the core training programme for foster carers.
p.20
The fostering service ensures that children and young people, and their families, are
provided with foster care services which value diversity and promote equality. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 Carers who looked after children with disabilities felt that the support given was generally very good – with the exception of the provision of equipment. There needs to be more proactive thinking around the provision of aids and adaptations for families who look after children with disabilities which should occur no later than the second placement review, or sooner if the need arises. The problem of short- term placements often ‘overrunning’ could then be addressed and appropriate aids and adaptations could be provided where the placement is becoming longer term. Carers who are then of the view that they are struggling with providing care could also then be provided with the necessary equipment earlier should this be necessary.
p.20
The fostering service ensures that children and young people, and their families, are
Information from the Pre-Inspection Questionnaire states that the fostering service actively promotes diversity and anti-discriminatory practice. The Service Plan states that the service is continuing to work towards their aim to increase the pool of carers for children with disabilities, unaccompanied young people and children and young people from ethnic minority communities. Information from the children’s group meeting and questionnaires supports the position that they are valued and encouraged to develop and pursue their interests and hobbies. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 19
p.20
carers only if they represent appropriate matches for a child for whom a local
authority is seeking a carer. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 Most of the carers who were present at the carers group meeting had experienced trans-race/trans- cultural placements. All were very positive about the experience. On a negative note, it was felt that the foster care team only looked at a child’s skin colour and for this reason terminated placements abruptly, if a family of a more appropriate racial origin (specifically in terms of skin colour) became available. It was felt that they failed to consider other issues such as language, diet and religion. There were mixed views about the additional support given in these placements. One carer who had a black child had immediately been given additional funding for hair/skin care. However one carer who had cared for Muslim children had asked for extra help with English tuition, and was told it was not available. Those who foster new-borns felt that more should be made of the child’s birthday. Most
p.21
carers only if they represent appropriate matches for a child for whom a local
newborns would come home from hospital with a bounty bag, cards and photos. These were often lacking for children going straight to foster care, and made it hard for carers to start off their fostered child’s life story books. It was accepted that children placed in an emergency could rarely be properly prepared. Nevertheless it was generally felt that the old system where there was a dedicated emergency team with specific knowledge of foster care worked far better than the current generic duty system.
p.21
carers only if they represent appropriate matches for a child for whom a local
Where foster carers are asked to take placements outside of their approved category this is now monitored and the situation is now informed to the fostering panel as part of their quality assurance function.
p.21
The fostering service protects each child or young person from all forms of abuse,
neglect, exploitation and deprivation. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 All those present at the carers group meeting were unanimous in their views regarding the support given if there is a child protection issue. Their view was that basically there is no support for carers. If a child protection allegation was made, the carers said that they were totally left out on a limb, even to the extent of being told by members of the fostering team that they would be ‘on their own’ until the issue was resolved. While all the carers understood and appreciated the fact that the staff were employed by the Council and therefore may have to observe strict boundaries in such circumstances, they felt that there should be some external advocate that they could contact. Consideration should be given by the fostering service to establishing an independent support framework for carers that could advise and offer emotional support to carers who experience these situations. The fostering
p.21
The fostering service protects each child or young person from all forms of abuse,
service has, since the previous annual inspection, issued guidance to foster carers about how to tackle bullying that children may report as experiencing, whether at school or in the home.
p.21
being bullied:
90 % London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 20
p.21
encouraged to maintain and develop family contacts and friendships as set out in
her/his care plan and/or foster placement agreement. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 Evidence from foster carers and children’s questionnaires indicated that children were supported to maintain regular contact with their birth families. The service expects that the commitment of foster carers to assisting children to maintain contact with parents was pivotal in their initial acceptance and approval as foster carers. The issues around the importance of contact, where this is in the child’s best interests, remains an integral part of foster carers training and preparation. It also continues to be evident that where children have limited contact with birth parents foster carers are also pro-active with supporting children to maintain these links.
p.22
others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their
daily life and their future. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The normal point for children and their families to express their views arises at the annual review and when Looked After Children documents are reviewed. The majority of the children who spoke with the Inspection team confirmed that they knew how to make a complaint to the Local Authority and details of how to make a complaint to the Commission has been added to the information booklet that is given to them. Of particular interest was the range of suggestions that children and young people made to the Inspection team for things that they think could be improved. These are as follows:
p.22
others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their
Easier access to contact with their Social Worker when they have questions to ask
p.22
others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their
That as fostered children they would like to have the chance to meet others in foster care as a group
p.22
others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their
That the Inspection should be more child friendly and that the children’s group meeting should be held in a different venue (on this occasion it was held in a Committee room at the Town Hall)
p.22
others significant to the child, are sought over all issues that are likely to affect their
All of these suggestions should be explored by the fostering service in more depth with the children, with the exception of the final suggestion, which will be passed on by the Commission to the Commission for Social Care Inspection, which will take over the work of the NCSC in April 2004. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 21
p.22
training appropriate to her/his age and understanding to enable informed participation
in decisions about her/his health needs. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 At the foster carers meeting it was suggested that there could be better planning with regard to things like medical check ups for the children, so that they were not unnecessarily repeated. A couple of years ago there was a medical co-ordinator in post and it was queried if they still existed. Additionally it was noted from some of the children’s case records that consent to medical treatment, specifically where it was required to be signed by a child’s birth parent or legal guardian, was missing and had not been followed up. Clearly there may be some cases where a birth parent, or parents, may not be willing to co-operate by signing the necessary consent documentation, however, in these instances this should be clearly stated on file as being the case. The authority should liaise with their own legal department to explore the position of foster carers in these circumstances and to provide clear
p.23
training appropriate to her/his age and understanding to enable informed participation
guidance to the authority as a whole as to what to do if signed consent can not be obtained from birth parents or legal guardians in the case of children who not the subject of care orders.
p.23
child or young person in foster care and ensures that she/he is encouraged to attain
her/his full potential. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 2 The Fostering Service still does not on a regular basis monitor the educational achievements of the children placed with its foster carers although Croydon has introduced a specific annual awards event that celebrates children’s achievements in this area to which carers may nominate children for an award. The Fostering Service involves a Looked After Children Education Team to provide input in the training of foster carers and actively promote their educational attainment. Foster carers are expected to support the children in their education and where agreed liaise with schools. It does provide extra financial support if children are not in school but also recognises that this remains an area where extra provision needs to be developed. Foster carers also contribute to the children’s Personal Education Plan, although more diligence is needed by placing Social Workers in district
p.23
child or young person in foster care and ensures that she/he is encouraged to attain
Social Work teams to ensure that these plans are completed for all children and updated annually. The Fostering Service has now provided all foster children of school age with a computer.
p.23
The fostering service ensures that their foster care services help to develop skills,
competence and knowledge necessary for adult living. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 As reported at the previous annual inspection, the London Borough of Croydon has a specific team to help prepare young people for independence. All foster carers with young people of 16 yeas plus help in developing Pathway Plans to ensure that the young people are adequately prepared for leaving care. In some circumstances young people can also continue to live with their foster carers after their 18 th birthday in supported care arrangements or have after care support provided by their foster carers. Foster carers are also involved in Preparation for Leaving Care Groups. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 22
p.23
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• The people who work in or for the fostering service are suitable to work with
p.24
number of staff and carers and their range of qualifications and experience are
sufficient to achieve the purposes and functions of the organisation.
p.24
Any people working in or for the fostering service are suitable people to work with
children and young people and to safeguard and promote their welfare. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 As part of the tracking exercise on the files of the foster carers it was noted that out of 3 files there was either only partial CRB information for relevant carers or members of the household or in cases there was none. It was reported at the previous annual inspection that this should be addressed using a monitoring programme, which is now in place, to ensure that all outstanding checks have been completed.
p.24
Any people working in or for the fostering service are suitable people to work with
One personnel file, that of a Supporting Social Worker who has joined the team since the previous annual inspection, was examined. This contained all of the necessary information that is required.
p.24
Staff are organised and managed in a way that delivers an efficient and effective
foster care service. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The fostering service continues to have clear lines of management accountability. Staff receive regular supervision and support from the Team Manager. The fostering service team meeting was observed as a part of this inspection and was seen to be monitor and prioritise workloads, assign tasks to appropriate staff and to discuss plans and proposals for development of the service. The core areas of work of the Supervising Social Workers are regularly monitored and the service manager is still seeking a method for improved data monitoring. Once a system is in place this should greatly assist the service in highlighting tasks that require attention as well as aid information gathering for statistical and management purposes. A designated team carries out the recruitment of foster carers. Therefore Supervising Social Workers are not involved in this process but have a target
p.24
Staff are organised and managed in a way that delivers an efficient and effective
figure of 15 foster carers to support and visit on a monthly basis. As the foster carer recruitment and retention programme has achieved a good degree of success further recruitment to the team has occurred by means of employing a number of sessional social work staff. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 23
p.24
qualified staff and recruits a range of carers to meet the needs of children and young
people for whom it aims to provide a service. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 As reported at the previous annual inspection, The full time staff employed are currently adequate to meet the needs of the fostering service. The staff interviewed were positive about the support and training they received and the way the service is developing. The recruitment of foster carers continues to focus at recruiting a range of carers to meet the needs of the children who were to be provided a service. There is an appropriate level of clerical and administrative support for the size of the service. There is a clear set out assessment process detailing all the qualities, competences and aptitudes expected from prospective foster carers.
p.25
The fostering service is a fair and competent employer, with sound employment
practices and good support for its staff and carers. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The recruitment and employment practices were sound in respect of both staff and carers. There was a 24 hour support service which was commented on positively by foster carers in their interviews, although some carers were under the impression that it was only the general emergency duty team that provided this and were not aware that the service also provides this specific support. It would, therefore, be advisable that the service reminds all carers that they can access specific fostering service support outside of office hours. The fostering service had comprehensive health and safety policies for all those involved in the service and adequate insurance to cover all eventualities. There is now a Whistle-blowing Policy for foster carers and contact details and explanation of the role of the National Care Standards Commission involvement in the complaints process.
p.25
There is a good quality training programme to enhance individual skills and to keep
staff up-to-date with professional and legal developments. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The Local Authority provides core training for its employees. All new staff undertake a Foundation Child Protection course, and can also undertake interdisciplinary training in Child Protection. There are opportunities to enhance and develop individual skills. Staff training needs are identified through supervision and current issues and legal developments are discussed at team meetings. An identified training strategy for fostering service staff that is routinely evaluated and linked to the Statement of Purpose and aims and objectives of the service has now been developed. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 24
p.25
Standard 20 (20.1 - 20.5)
All staff are properly accountable and supported. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 As reported at the previous annual inspection, all staff have clear written details of the duties and responsibilities expected of them. The policies and procedures of the organisation are contained in overarching policy documents for children services. All the staff receive regular formal supervision as well as informal discussions and consultations. There are weekly team meetings and a Unit Meeting.
p.26
Standard 21 (21.1 - 21.6)
The fostering service has a clear strategy for working with and supporting carers. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The overall response from the foster carers who attended the carers meeting was positive about the support that is provided by supporting Social Workers, however some criticisms were made of the systems that the service operates. All those present were unanimous in their condemnation of the ad-hoc payment system. It was impossible to determine what payments were for, and often the payments arrived very late. There were several examples of staff not honouring verbal agreements regarding additional support for a particular child (children). Examples given were the provision of a taxi to take a child to school, and the retraction of agreement to pay an enhanced rate. The majority of those who gave responses to the Inspection team felt that the information provided about individual children was often wrong. It was passed down through many tiers of staff and could
p.26
Standard 21 (21.1 - 21.6)
actually end up being totally inaccurate. A number of the carers felt that given they were assessed each year as to their continuing suitability, they, in turn, would like to be asked for their views on the foster care team. These perceptions are clearly at odds with the aim of the systems that the service has in place that is designed to support carers in their role. The fostering service must address these issues, as there is a risk of loosing carers who may not perceive that the service does all that it can to support them.
p.26
The fostering service is a managed one that provides supervision for foster carers
and helps them to develop their skills. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 Most of the foster carers that provided responses to the Inspection team have had good experiences of working with supervising social workers, however several commented that better forward planning was needed. The foster care team should know when a child is about to be moved on, or when they reach 18, and that a place will then become available in that home. Better planning would prevent placements remaining empty for months at a time. There was universal agreement that carers were not supported in making complaints. Indeed, they all felt that it was pointless to try to pursue a complaint beyond making an initial comment as they felt that they were stigmatised and future placements were less likely to be made. On a positive note, all agreed that funding to purchase essential items such as clothing was usually promptly paid, albeit there was often a lengthy delay in
p.26
The fostering service is a managed one that provides supervision for foster carers
the commencement of payment of regular fees for newly placed children (please also refer to Standard 21).
p.26
The fostering service is a managed one that provides supervision for foster carers
It was also noted by the Inspection team that agreements in relation to individual placements for children with specific carers is missing in some of the cases that were tracked. The requirement to have these agreements in place must be more diligently applied. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 25
p.26
provide high quality care and meet the needs of each child/young person placed in
their care. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The feedback that was received from carers was almost entirely very positive about the training provided. Access to training is believed by carers to be easy and there is a wide range of courses available. It is, however, necessary for the service to do better at evidencing what courses particular carers have attended, and to note this on the individual carers records. This would greatly assist in the monitoring of individual carers training needs and in keeping track of any short falls in training that occur. Additionally it would also help to identify when specific training needs to be refreshed. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 26
p.27
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• All appropriate records are kept and are accessible in relation to the fostering services and the individual foster carers and foster children.
p.28
maintained for each child or young person in foster care which details the nature and
quality of care provided and contributes to an understanding of her/his life events.
p.28
Relevant information from the case records is made available to the child and to
anyone involved in her/his care. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 The degree of information that is kept directly by the fostering service varies considerably. The Inspection team were provided with access to the district Social Work files of specific children who were randomly selected as a part of the case tracking exercise. The amount of information that was present also varied considerably as too did the diligence with which information was obtained, or was noted as being unobtainable. The list below outlines examples of necessary information that was lacking in some cases:
p.28
Relevant information from the case records is made available to the child and to
• Medical consent section of Looked After Children forms not signed by relevant persons authorised to provide consent (please also refer to Standard 9) • Personal Education Plans • Fully completed Looked After Children documentation (although there were several cases this was quite good) • Evidence of health checks for children, in at least one case a full annual medical appeared to be overdue • Pathway plan for young people leaving care (although it was acknowledged on record that one was needed)
p.28
Relevant information from the case records is made available to the child and to
Clearly in the case of emergency placements, or in the case of children not previously being known to the Social Services Department, full information may not be readily or immediately available. However, in many instances children are known to the authority prior to their placement with the fostering service and in these cases there is no excuse for relevant background information not being shared with the service, and particularly the children’s foster carers. Failure in this area risk undermining the potential for successful matching decisions to be made which must be based on all relevant factors that need to be considered in relation to individual children’s needs. This failure in turn risks undermining the potential for a successful placement. There is an urgent need for far closer liaison between the Looked After Children’s Teams in the district offices and the fostering service in order to ensure that information that is pertinent to the care of children is shared without unnecessary
p.28
Relevant information from the case records is made available to the child and to
delay. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 27
p.28
The fostering service's administrative records contain all significant information
relevant to the running of the foster care service and as required by regulations. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 A total of 10 Foster Carer files were tracked as a part of this inspection. These records varied in quality and it was noted that in some cases the following information was not in evidence:-
p.29
The fostering service's administrative records contain all significant information
Copies of written references Evidence of training carried out by carers Foster care agreements Evidence that CRB checks were carried out (although this was later confirmed) (there was also paperwork on some of the files that related to children who had moved on. This should have been re-filed elsewhere)
p.29
The fostering service's administrative records contain all significant information
An auditing system is in place, however, it is evident that in a least some cases this is failing to highlight gaps in information or the action that needs to be taken to remedy this. The fostering service should now fully audit all approved foster carers files in order to identify what information is missing and implement an action plan to obtain the missing information for all carers who have been approved since 1 st April 2002. It would also be advisable for the service to add to the standard reference request letter a specific question that asks the referee if they know of any information or reason that suggests that a prospective carer may be unsuitable to care for children.
p.29
The fostering service's administrative records contain all significant information
Number of current foster placements supported by the agency: 172 Number of placements made by the agency in the last 12 months: 280
p.29
months:
Number of new foster carers approved during the last 12 months: 29 Number of foster carers who left the agency during the last 12 months: 6
p.29
Maximum £
368.53 London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 28
p.29
The intended outcome for the following standard is:
• The premises used as offices by the fostering service are suitable for the purpose.
p.30
Standard 26 (26.1 - 26.5)
Premises used as offices by the fostering service are appropriate for the purpose. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 The Fostering and Adoption Service operates from one open plan office. They have access to two private rooms for meetings and consultations, which can be opened out to provide adequate space for the monthly team meetings. All other fostering service activities, training, panel meetings and foster carers support groups are carried out in different Local Authority buildings. The fostering service has generally efficient administrative procedures and appropriate IT and communication equipment and a new IT programme has recently been introduced. Croydon Council has back up systems for information retrieval however a risk assessment of how the service would operate without access to IT and or hard copy systems may be useful, as was suggested at the previous annual inspection. The Service Manager is continuing his efforts to identify a suitable database that
p.30
Standard 26 (26.1 - 26.5)
would allow for easier access to management information. This would have the added benefit of assisting the service to keep track of the complex range of information that is required to be held and with identifying the point at which certain information requires updating. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 29
p.30
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• The agency fostering services are financially viable and appropriate and timely payments are made to foster carers.
p.31
The agency ensures it is financially viable at all times and has sufficient financial
resources to fulfil its obligations. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 0 This standard was not examined in any detail at this inspection.
p.31
The financial processes/systems of the agency are properly operated and maintained
in accordance with sound and appropriate accounting standards and practice. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 A budget and financial position document for the fostering service was provided. The overall budget is allocated to specific budget headings and the Local Authority internal financial section monitors these regularly. The ability of the fostering service to achieve its agreed development targets for 2004/2005 is dependent on the priorities of the Local Authority Social Services Department. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 30
p.31
cost of caring for each child or young person placed with him or her. Payments are
made promptly and at the agreed time. Allowances and fees are reviewed annually. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 There is a written policy on fostering allowances that is available to foster carers this is reviewed annually. Payments can be enhanced according to the needs of the child and the experience and qualification of the foster carers. However most of the responses from carers who attended the group meeting with the Inspection team stated that there continues to be anomalies in respect of finances, which included, inadequate support, and delays in decisions on financial enhancements and changes to the allowances. It was once again suggested by carers that an itemised payment system would help to identify whether under or overpayments were being made. It remains important that foster carers receive clear information about the allowances and expenses payable. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 31
p.32
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• Fostering panels are organised efficiently and effectively so as to ensure that
p.33
Fostering panels have clear written policies and procedures, which are implemented
in practice, about the handling of their functions. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 Two members of the Inspection team observed the fostering panel. This panel meeting considered two applications for the approval of new foster carers and four foster carer annual reviews, three of which included consideration of a change of category of children for which the carers in question were originally approved. This observation noted that the panel was well conducted, efficient and relatively effective. The Chair commented that the fostering service was slowly starting to act in accordance with the Panel’s recommendations. Quality assurance systems (particularly monitoring) are being introduced, and the Chair showed an experienced and proactive approach to the improvements that are necessary for the service. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 32
p.33
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• When foster care is provided as a short-term break for a child, the arrangement recognises that the parents remain the main carers for the child.
p.34
have policies and procedures, implemented in practice, to meet the particular needs
of children receiving short-term breaks. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 3 As reported at the previous annual inspection, the fostering service has a policy and procedure in place for referral and decision making process in respect of the placement of children for short-term breaks. These are normally focussed on children with disabilities although there are also arrangements in place for non disabled children as part of general support to families.
p.34
have policies and procedures, implemented in practice, to meet the particular needs
Two foster families who provide this service were visited as a part of this inspection. The carers reported that the level of support that they receive is appropriate. (Please refer to standard 7 for additional comments made by other carers). London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 33
p.34
The intended outcome for the following set of standards is:
• Local authority fostering services' policies and procedures for assessing,
p.35
there is recognition of the particular relationship and position of family and friend
carers. Key Findings and Evidence Standard met? 1 The families of children placed under Regulation 38 (Family and friends as carers) who provided feedback to the Inspection team were unanimous in feeling that they were not treated in the same way as other carers. While they had to meet all of the standards applied to other foster carers, they believed that they are not provided with anything like the same range of funding for providing for children’s needs. This in their view could lead to financial difficulties, but if funds were requested they also believed that they were made to feel like ‘money-grabbers’. The national minimum standards for fostering services specifically require that the service provide for support and training needs in the same way as that which is expected to be provided for carers who look after children in other circumstances. To this end it is necessary for the fostering service to explore this view of friend and
p.35
there is recognition of the particular relationship and position of family and friend
family carers in order to understand the perception of unequal treatment that exists and to address any shortcomings that may be identified. The fostering service points out that family and friend carers are not expected to provide some of the services that other carers do, for example to be on the rota of carers to provide placements out of hours. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 34
p.35
Date
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 35
p.37
comments/confirmation relating to the content and accuracy of the report for
We would welcome comments on the content of this report relating to the Inspection conducted on <enter date(s) of inspection here> and any factual inaccuracies:
p.37
comments/confirmation relating to the content and accuracy of the report for
Please limit your comments to one side of A4 if possible London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 36
p.37
Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:
Amendments to the report were necessary NO
p.38
Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:
Comments were received from the provider YES
p.38
Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:
Provider comments/factual amendments were incorporated into the final inspection report YES
p.38
Action taken by the NCSC in response to the provider’s comments:
NO Provider comments are available on file at the Area Office but have not been incorporated into the final inspection report. The inspector believes the report to be factually accurate
p.38
Note:
In instances where there is a major difference of view between the Inspector and the Registered Provider responsible Local Authority fostering service Manager both views will be made available on request to the Area Office.
p.38
report:
Action plan was received at the point of publication YES
p.38
report:
Action plan covers all the statutory requirements in a timely fashion YES
p.38
report:
Action plan did not cover all the statutory requirements and required further discussion NO
p.38
report:
Provider has declined to provide an action plan NO
p.38
Public reports
It should be noted that all NCSC inspection reports are public documents. Reports on children’s homes are only obtainable on personal application to NCSC offices. London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service Page 37
p.38
Registered Person’s or responsible Local Authority Manager’s statement of
agreement/comments: Please complete the relevant section that applies.
p.39
Date
Note: In instance where there is a profound difference of view between the Inspector and the Registered Provider both views will be reported. Please attach any extra pages, as applicable.
p.39
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service / 13th January 2004 (Inspection Commenced)
Commission for Social Care Inspection 33 Greycoat Street London SW1P 2QF
p.40
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service / 13th January 2004 (Inspection Commenced)
Telephone: 020 7979 2000 Fax: 020 7979 2111
p.40
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service / 13th January 2004 (Inspection Commenced)
National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 www.csci.org.uk
p.40
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service / 13th January 2004 (Inspection Commenced)
S0000053222.V100071.R01 © This report may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection
p.40
London Borough of Croydon Fostering Service / 13th January 2004 (Inspection Commenced)
The paper used in this document is supplied from a sustainable source
p.40
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion