Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Dennis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Dennis

  • Postcode verified

    DL1 5QT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−18Mixedmore positive than 16% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongstrengthimprovedrobustwell supportedclearpromptlysensitive
Criticismrisk of harmat riskoverlookedconcernsinsufficientlylacknot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings650w+13
  • What needs to improve321w−58

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
969
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 22, typical 45
Average sentence
32 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 33%

Full report text

Mr Murray Rose Director of Children’s Services Darlington Borough Council Town Hall Feethams Darlington DL1 5QT

p.1

arrangements within Darlington Borough Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Darlington Borough Council which was conducted on 21 and 22 September 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Darlington Borough Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Darlington Borough Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Darlington Borough Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Strong partnership working arrangements have been established to promote good outcomes for children in need of protection. For example, frequent and regular liaison meetings are held with the consultant paediatrician and relevant designated health staff in respect of children who present at accident and emergency services to ensure best practice in protecting children. Good partnership arrangements are in place with police to undertake Section 47 enquiries in appropriate cases. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ A well-resourced out-of-hours service provides a good level of service, which includes the capacity to undertake welfare check visits, and works well with daytime services to manage risk of harm to children.

p.1

following areas

ƒ Prompt action has been taken by the council in response to some of the areas for development identified at the last inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements. Issues relating to the completion of agency checks and conducting initial assessments have been addressed and additional resources deployed to the childcare planning teams have improved arrangements for the transfer of cases. ƒ There is a prompt and appropriate response to safeguard children and young people where there are immediate and clear child protection concerns. ƒ Arrangements for Section 47 strategy meetings and discussions are robust. These take place promptly, involve key professionals and are well recorded. ƒ A committed and motivated social work team report that they are well supported in their work and have confidence in the leadership of their team manager. ƒ An experienced and dedicated business support team provide valued support

p.2

following areas

to social workers in their work with children and families. ƒ Children with disabilities receive sensitive specialist assessment of their needs from a dedicated team for children with disabilities and there are good joint working arrangements in place with the childcare duty team in respect of children who are in need of protection. ƒ The individual needs of children and families, such as ethnicity, culture or language are appropriately considered and addressed. ƒ Cases sampled by inspectors demonstrated a child focused approach. Children and young people are routinely seen and their views taken into account as part of their assessment. ƒ Completed initial and core assessments seen by inspectors are of satisfactory quality. ƒ The childcare duty team includes an intensive support team that provides valuable support at the most critical stage, when children are at risk of becoming looked after. ƒ Newly qualified social workers are offered a comprehensive support package

p.2

following areas

which includes mentoring and study days. Social workers have access to a suitable range of training opportunities.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Duty team social workers continue to carry high caseloads. This impacts on the quality, timely completion and recording of work and results in some children not receiving the services they require. This is recognised by the council and plans are in place to strengthen duty team resources. ƒ While prompt allocation of cases is a priority, systems to risk assess and manage the small number of children in need cases which are not immediately allocated, are insufficiently rigorous. This is also the case for referrals where further enquiries are necessary before a decision to close or proceed to assessment can be made. ƒ There is a lack of clarity about the distinction between contacts and referrals and this is resulting in inaccurate data completion relating to this area of work. ƒ While improvements to the electronic recording system are ongoing, a combination of electronic and paper recording is in use. This causes

p.3

Areas for development

duplication, can be burdensome and could result in essential information being overlooked. ƒ A review of the response of services to domestic abuse has been recently undertaken however the screening and risk assessment of police domestic abuse referrals continues to be an area for development. The volume of these referrals is contributing to the heavy workloads of the childcare duty team manager and staff. ƒ While the common assessment framework (CAF) is well established across children’s services, childcare duty team staff members do not routinely ascertain whether a previous CAF has been completed before proceeding to initial assessment. This could result in information being overlooked or unnecessary duplication for children and families.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Ada Burns, Chief Executive, Darlington Borough Council Jenni Cook, Assistant Director/Interim Chair of Darlington Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Cyndi Hughes, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Darlington Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion