Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
DE4 3AG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 800
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Bruce Buckley Strategic Director - Children and Younger Adults Derbyshire County Council County Hall Matlock Derbyshire DE4 3AG
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children’s services in Derbyshire County Council perform well.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children get off to a good start, with a very large proportion of childminders and childcare settings that are good or better. The quality of nursery provision is particularly good and approximately one third is outstanding. However, the performance of the local authority’s schools is varied with too much provision in both primary and secondary schools judged no better than adequate. More than half the secondary schools are good or better which is above average for similar areas, but not as good as the national picture. The proportion of good or better school sixth forms is above the average for similar areas, however the quality of post-16 provision overall, including General Further Education Colleges, is not as good as the national average. Provision in education and social care for those whose circumstances make them more vulnerable is variable. There is good provision in all 10 of the local authority’s special schools and six of the eight pupil referral units. The
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
local authority’s fostering service is good, but the adoption agency and private fostering arrangements are adequate and not as good as that found in similar areas. The overall effectiveness of children’s homes is mixed. While most are good or better, four are adequate.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
A recent joint area review identified good provision for safeguarding and for looked after children. A serious case review completed in January 2009 was judged inadequate with weaknesses in the rigour of decision-making and the quality of assessments during the period under consideration.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Performance against the very large majority of national indicators is in line with similar areas and national averages. There is almost no performance below average for staying safe and enjoying and achieving. Equally, there is only one indicator where the local authority performs better than the national average in these areas. Recent performance data illustrates a slight decline in the number of social care assessments that are completed within the required timescales. However, there is continuing good performance in the low number of child protection plans lasting two years or more. The proportion of young people who achieve five or more higher grade GCSEs is in line with similar areas and just above national averages. The difference in educational attainment of children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable and others of the same age is not as wide as in similar areas. The gap in achievement is closing at both the ages of 11 and 16 for
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
young people with special educational needs. However, it is getting wider for young people from low income families at both the ages of 16 and 19. The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion