Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pietro Battista

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pietro Battista

  • Postcode verified

    EX2 4QD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+29Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrengthimprovedrobustpositiveskilledpromptlysafe
Criticismpoornot alwaysdelaysnot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings523w+80
  • What needs to improve190w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
713
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 24, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 27%

Full report text

Ms Anne Whiteley Executive Director of Children and Young Persons’ Services Devon County Council Room 126, County Hall Topsham Road Exeter EX2 4QD

p.1

arrangements within Devon’s children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Devon County Council which was conducted on 29 and 30 June 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Devon’s children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and practice managers undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Devon’s children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and satisfactory practice, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Devon’s children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Staff are well motivated, have access to good training and value the professional advice and support provided by managers, who are readily accessible for formal and informal consultation.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Links between the out-of-hours service and the contact and referral service are effective to enable appropriate information to be shared promptly and the out- of-hours staff undertake some non-emergency visits during evenings and Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk weekends to ensure that children are safe.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub, a pathfinder service, which brings together statutory and voluntary agencies into a central contact point for referrals, while in early stages of development, enables improved intelligence gathering and information sharing across partner agencies.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Clear procedures and practices are in place to ensure that statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people are met.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Communication and liaison with partner agencies are effective and contribute towards prompt referral and exchange of information.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Contacts and referrals, including child protection referrals, receive a prompt response and are subject to robust initial decision making.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ All cases held within referral and assessment services are allocated to and assessed by suitably qualified and experienced staff.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Children are routinely seen and interviewed, where appropriate, during assessments.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Diversity issues are appropriately considered in case work practice.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Most assessments are of a satisfactory quality and some are good.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ The outcome of referrals is routinely notified to families and to referring agencies.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Regular supervision is provided to staff and management decisions are routinely recorded on case files.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Managers at all levels routinely monitor management information and audit cases.

p.2

Satisfactory practice

ƒ Early intervention and increased use of the common assessment framework results in more positive outcomes for increased numbers of children in need.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Protocols for transfer of cases from the referral and assessment teams to long- term teams are in place. However, significant capacity issues within the long- term teams result in cases being held too long within the referral and assessment teams. This increases pressures on staff within the referral and assessment teams and reduces the time available to them to ensure recording is up-to-date and to maintain a good standard of practice. ƒ Despite improvements to the electronic records systems, poor system operating performance results in staff experiencing significant delays in accessing or inputting onto case files and records.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Contacts, received through referral co-ordinators, do not always contain accurate or sufficient information. Not all staff are sufficiently skilled in sensitive information gathering.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Phil Norrey, Chief Executive, Devon County Council Alan Wooderson, Independent Chair of the Devon Safeguarding Children Board Cllr Andrea Davis, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Devon County Council Cllr Christine Channon, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Devon County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion