Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Local authority data pack

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    DY1 1JQ

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivestrongvery wellexcellenteffectivelyambitiouspositive
Criticisminadequateweaknessesat risklowinsufficientharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1060w+65
  • Leadership43w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,054
shorter than usual (typical 3558)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%Leadership 4%

Full report text

17 December 2008 Mr John Freeman Director of Children’s Services Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council Westox House 1 Trinity Road Dudley West Midlands DY1 1JQ

p.1

Council 2008

This letter summarises the findings of the 2008 annual performance assessment (APA) for your council. The evaluations and judgements in the letter draw on a range of data and information which covers the period 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008. As you know, the APA is not based on an inspection of your services and, therefore, can only provide a snapshot based on the evidence considered. As such, I am grateful to you for assuring the quality of the data provided.

p.1

Council 2008

Performance is judged on a four point scale as detailed in the handbook. I should emphasise that the grades awarded are based on an overall ‘best fit’ model. For instance, an outstanding judgement of Grade 4 reflects that overall most aspects, but not necessarily all, of the services in the area are working very well. We know that one of the features of outstanding provision is the drive for greater improvement and no council would suggest, and nor would Ofsted, that a judgement of outstanding indicates that everything is perfect. Similarly within a judgement of inadequate overall, Grade 1, there could be some aspects of the overall service that are adequate or even good. Judgements are made in a rounded way, balancing all of the evidence and giving due consideration to outcomes, local and national contexts, priorities and decision-making. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Council 2008

www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0115 944 9193 Direct F 0115 944 9307 Midlands_apa@ofsted.gov.uk The following table sets out the grades awarded for performance in 2008.

p.1

Assessment judgement area APA grade

Overall effectiveness of children’s services 3 Being healthy 3 Staying safe 3 Enjoying and achieving 3 Making a positive contribution 3 Achieving economic well-being 3 Capacity to improve, including the management of services for children and young people

p.2

Assessment judgement area APA grade

Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale 4: outstanding/excellent; 3: good; 2: adequate; 1: inadequate

p.2

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council delivers services that are consistently above the minimum requirements for children and young people. All services can demonstrate how they are improving the achievement and economic well-being of children and young people. Early years provision is good, educational achievement at 16 has risen strongly and there are no schools requiring special measures. It is clear that these services continue to have a good impact on the outcomes achieved by children and young people in Dudley. There are significant strengths in all areas, especially enabling children and young people to participate fully in local decision making and thereby making a positive contribution to their local community. The council provides a good range of well-coordinated opportunities to enable young people to voice their views on a variety of issues. Importantly, services have worked effectively together to reduce anti-social behaviour through commissioning and

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

running a series of successful projects. As a result, the rate of youth offending is low and reducing, as is the rate of recidivism. Services are working successfully to support young people most likely to offend. There are a significant number of initiatives in place to improve the health of children and young people, ensuring that they have access to a range of services to meet their needs, with schools contributing effectively to health promotion.

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

Although the council’s contribution to safeguarding children and young people remains good, areas exist where performance has weakened. For example, overall performance in completing initial and core assessments remains high, but the timeliness of completing reviews of looked after children has fallen. The inspection of the fostering service shows that there are some weaknesses in care planning and risk assessment for some looked after children. The council have taken swift and decisive action to implement an effective action plan to address the recommendations raised and strengthen service delivery.

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

This well managed council has a good capacity to improve its services further. The council has strong leadership and an ambitious vision. Collaboration with strategic partners is effective and the council’s performance management framework is good. Monitoring of schools’ performance is both robust and effective; there is a strong track record in supporting improvement, together with pursuing new initiatives to develop interagency and partnership work. The council targets resources well to secure improvements. The council’s analysis of its strengths and areas for development is consistent with the evidence. There are no additional recommendations to make as a result of the APA. The children's services grade is the performance rating for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will also provide the score for the children and young people service block in the comprehensive performance

p.3

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

assessment to be published by the Audit Commission.

p.4

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

We are grateful for the information you provided as part of this process and for the time given by you and your colleagues in preparing for the assessment.

p.4

Overall effectiveness of children’s services Grade 3

Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, Local Services Inspection

p.4

Being healthy

ƒ Schools contribute very effectively to health promotion. ƒ Effective partner and interagency work promote and provide support for healthy family lifestyles. ƒ Effective child and adolescent mental health services.

p.5

Being healthy

ƒ Low breast-feeding rates. ƒ Conceptions among those under age 18 are too high.

p.5

Staying safe

ƒ Multi-agency collaboration and strategies ensure effective assessments of children most at risk of harm or abuse. ƒ A high proportion of disabled children are very well supported in their transition to adult services.

p.5

Staying safe

ƒ Risk assessments of children in foster care. ƒ The timeliness of reviews of children in care.

p.5

Enjoying and achieving

ƒ Good progress at Key Stage 4 and attainment that has risen significantly. ƒ Good early years provision.

p.5

Making a positive contribution

ƒ Good involvement of young people and demonstrable impact on services. ƒ Low and reducing re-offending rates compared to those found in similar areas. ƒ Good access to education and training.

p.5

Achieving economic well-being

ƒ Good 14 to 19 partnerships. ƒ Low incidence of young people not in education employment or training and a significant increase in the numbers of young people entering young apprentice schemes. ƒ The proportion of young people gaining Level 2 and Level 3 qualifications at ages 16 and 19 above that of similar councils. A-level scores are well above national figures.

p.5

Achieving economic well-being

ƒ Progression and participation rates post-16 for vulnerable groups especially those young people who are in the care of the council and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.

p.5

management of children’s services

ƒ Good track record of improvement in educational achievement and economic well-being. ƒ The impact of the children and young people’s voice in decision making. ƒ Strong leadership, ambitious vision and effective partnership arrangements.

p.6

management of children’s services

ƒ Insufficient number of qualified social workers in post.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion